If you had to choose between...
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: , FL
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you had to choose between...
I'm considering a 2.4GHz computer radio, have never owned one and don't know much about them. I've done a little research and think I have it narrowed down to the Spektrum Dx6i or the Futaba 6EX.
I like the menu options of being able to name a model w// the Spektrum, but like only needing to mount 1 rx component w/ the Futaba.
Thoughts?
I like the menu options of being able to name a model w// the Spektrum, but like only needing to mount 1 rx component w/ the Futaba.
Thoughts?
#3
My Feedback: (50)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jefferson City,
MO
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: If you had to choose between...
There are subtle differences, but this will probably come down to your preference in the end. Personally, I prefer the JR/Spektrum products. I used a DX7 last year in everything from park flyers to a 14lb Ohio R/C Chipmunk with a Zenoah G-26 gas engineabsolutely no issues. I've been so happy, I just purchased a JR X9303 2.4GHz.
I've never owned either of the models you're looking at so I can't speak first hand, but they both have good reputations. One difference to note is that the DX6i holds almost twice as many models (10) as the 6EX(6). If you're just getting started in the hobby, 6-model memory may sound like a lot, but trust meit isn't.
I've never owned either of the models you're looking at so I can't speak first hand, but they both have good reputations. One difference to note is that the DX6i holds almost twice as many models (10) as the 6EX(6). If you're just getting started in the hobby, 6-model memory may sound like a lot, but trust meit isn't.
#4
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: If you had to choose between...
I've found the DX6i to be a very solid package for a computerized sport radio. When you combine the easy programming and model naming features with the fact that extra full range receivers are only $79.99 versus $99.99 for the Futaba, there's really no reason to compare. The Futaba offers fewer features at a higher cost, and additional receivers are also significantly more expensive.
From a usability/reliability standpoint, there's nothing wrong with the Futaba 6EX FASST system, it's just not as good of a value.
From a usability/reliability standpoint, there's nothing wrong with the Futaba 6EX FASST system, it's just not as good of a value.
#5
My Feedback: (50)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jefferson City,
MO
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: If you had to choose between...
One other thing, like Barracuda said, don't let the aux receiver discourage you. I've never had a problem finding a home for it. I think it would be more difficult to mount the Futaba receiver in a manner that would keep the antennas in position at 90 degrees. Again, I've never actually used the Futaba 2.4GHZ equipment so take my opinions with that in mind.
Maybe a FASST supporter will chime in here soon...if you can find one.
Maybe a FASST supporter will chime in here soon...if you can find one.
#6
My Feedback: (2)
RE: If you had to choose between...
I have been Futaba since I first started to fly RC in 1978. It has always been rock solid and a good buy for the money. After I bought my Futaba 9C, I later compared the programming to the newer JR9303. I liked some of the additional programming features that were standard in the JR9303. I bought a JR9303 with a Synthesizer module. I love Flight Modes and The Flaps on a switch. I guess the 12 ch Futaba FASST is great. A friend of my bought that. I opted to buy the Spektrum module to get on the 2.4Ghz bandwagon. It came with a Spektrum AR9000 receiver. I like being able to switch back and forth between 72Mhz and 2.4Ghz until I have replaced all my 72Mhz receivers. When I bought the Spektrum module, the X9303 2.4 was not out yet.
#7
My Feedback: (18)
RE: If you had to choose between...
Another consideration:
I'm not sure a 2 piece receiver design would be as damage resistant as a single piece unit. Wires to break and fray and connectors to loosen. Plus they are not as easy to wrap in foam for protection, especially the second receiver unit. Vibration may become an issue for components hard mounted to the aircraft.
You might also consider the Airtronics RDS8000. Priced right, single piece receiver, easy to program, frequency hopping technology, no low voltage issues and reasonable price for extra receivers. Very positive feedback on RCU. 8 channels for the price of 7. Plus you can wrap the Airtronics receiver in foam for protection as the antenna wires are much longer than Futaba or Spektrum. Easier to place in the plane.
I'm not sure a 2 piece receiver design would be as damage resistant as a single piece unit. Wires to break and fray and connectors to loosen. Plus they are not as easy to wrap in foam for protection, especially the second receiver unit. Vibration may become an issue for components hard mounted to the aircraft.
You might also consider the Airtronics RDS8000. Priced right, single piece receiver, easy to program, frequency hopping technology, no low voltage issues and reasonable price for extra receivers. Very positive feedback on RCU. 8 channels for the price of 7. Plus you can wrap the Airtronics receiver in foam for protection as the antenna wires are much longer than Futaba or Spektrum. Easier to place in the plane.
#8
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fairfield,
CA
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: If you had to choose between...
Add another recommendation from me for the Airtronics. It's ridiculously easy to use and program, and it just works. I've flown Futaba exclusively for some time, and I'll never go back. Add in the fact that it's inexpensive and has 8 channels, and it becomes a no brainer.
#9
My Feedback: (11)
RE: If you had to choose between...
no low voltage issues...
The newest firmware allows the reciever to connect instantly instead of going through the boot up sequence. They even retro fit the older recievers, including return shipping, for free.
#10
My Feedback: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 4,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: If you had to choose between...
ORIGINAL: bigedmustafa
I've found the DX6i to be a very solid package for a computerized sport radio. When you combine the easy programming and model naming features with the fact that extra full range receivers are only $79.99 versus $99.99 for the Futaba, there's really no reason to compare. The Futaba offers fewer features at a higher cost, and additional receivers are also significantly more expensive.
From a usability/reliability standpoint, there's nothing wrong with the Futaba 6EX FASST system, it's just not as good of a value.
I've found the DX6i to be a very solid package for a computerized sport radio. When you combine the easy programming and model naming features with the fact that extra full range receivers are only $79.99 versus $99.99 for the Futaba, there's really no reason to compare. The Futaba offers fewer features at a higher cost, and additional receivers are also significantly more expensive.
From a usability/reliability standpoint, there's nothing wrong with the Futaba 6EX FASST system, it's just not as good of a value.
#11
Senior Member
My Feedback: (16)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Zephyrhills,
FL
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: If you had to choose between...
At the recent SEFF, the Guiness record for the most R/C airplanes flying at one time was broken. 99 models were in the air at once. Here is the breakdown of the radio equipment flown:
2 pilots on 53 Mhz
4 pilots on 50 Mhz
41 pilots on 72 Mhz
52 pilots on 2.4 gig
1 XPS
1 Futaba
50 JR/Spectrum
Looks like JR/Spektrum stuff on 2.4 is predominant. I'd like to see more competition from other brands, but not here. I'm sure that Futaba and Airtronics equipment are just as good.
2 pilots on 53 Mhz
4 pilots on 50 Mhz
41 pilots on 72 Mhz
52 pilots on 2.4 gig
1 XPS
1 Futaba
50 JR/Spectrum
Looks like JR/Spektrum stuff on 2.4 is predominant. I'd like to see more competition from other brands, but not here. I'm sure that Futaba and Airtronics equipment are just as good.
#12
RE: If you had to choose between...
ORIGINAL: Eplane65
At the recent SEFF, the Guiness record for the most R/C airplanes flying at one time was broken. 99 models were in the air at once. Here is the breakdown of the radio equipment flown:
2 pilots on 53 Mhz
4 pilots on 50 Mhz
41 pilots on 72 Mhz
52 pilots on 2.4 gig
1 XPS
1 Futaba
50 JR/Spectrum
Looks like JR/Spektrum stuff on 2.4 is predominant. I'd like to see more competition from other brands, but not here. I'm sure that Futaba and Airtronics equipment are just as good.
At the recent SEFF, the Guiness record for the most R/C airplanes flying at one time was broken. 99 models were in the air at once. Here is the breakdown of the radio equipment flown:
2 pilots on 53 Mhz
4 pilots on 50 Mhz
41 pilots on 72 Mhz
52 pilots on 2.4 gig
1 XPS
1 Futaba
50 JR/Spectrum
Looks like JR/Spektrum stuff on 2.4 is predominant. I'd like to see more competition from other brands, but not here. I'm sure that Futaba and Airtronics equipment are just as good.
This makes the extremely low incidence of those other than Spektrum appear very odd indeed .
However -In our area- the distribution is the same -
The other brands do work -but never the less - this is what we see.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Miramar,
FL
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: If you had to choose between...
ORIGINAL: Eplane65
At the recent SEFF, the Guiness record for the most R/C airplanes flying at one time was broken. 99 models were in the air at once. Here is the breakdown of the radio equipment flown:
2 pilots on 53 Mhz
4 pilots on 50 Mhz
41 pilots on 72 Mhz
52 pilots on 2.4 gig
1 XPS
1 Futaba
50 JR/Spectrum
Looks like JR/Spektrum stuff on 2.4 is predominant. I'd like to see more competition from other brands, but not here. I'm sure that Futaba and Airtronics equipment are just as good.
At the recent SEFF, the Guiness record for the most R/C airplanes flying at one time was broken. 99 models were in the air at once. Here is the breakdown of the radio equipment flown:
2 pilots on 53 Mhz
4 pilots on 50 Mhz
41 pilots on 72 Mhz
52 pilots on 2.4 gig
1 XPS
1 Futaba
50 JR/Spectrum
Looks like JR/Spektrum stuff on 2.4 is predominant. I'd like to see more competition from other brands, but not here. I'm sure that Futaba and Airtronics equipment are just as good.
That is just because JR/Spektrum came out with 2.4 for RC first, Lots of Futaba people including myself jumped to JR/Spektrum because of that, NOT because is better, I now own both systems.
Doug.
#14
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Left Coast ,
CA
Posts: 4,890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: If you had to choose between...
ORIGINAL: DougV
That is just because JR/Spektrum came out with 2.4 for RC first, Lots of Futaba people including myself jumped to JR/Spektrum because of that, NOT because is better, I now own both systems.
Doug.
That is just because JR/Spektrum came out with 2.4 for RC first, Lots of Futaba people including myself jumped to JR/Spektrum because of that, NOT because is better, I now own both systems.
Doug.