Go Back  RCU Forums > Radios, Batteries, Clubhouse and more > RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros
Reload this Page >

Does 2.4 have shorter range than traditional 72mhz?

Community
Search
Notices
RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros Discussion all about rc radios, transmitters, receivers, servos, etc.

Does 2.4 have shorter range than traditional 72mhz?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2008, 03:13 AM
  #1  
Magna
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Malaysia, MALAYSIA
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Does 2.4 have shorter range than traditional 72mhz?

Hi all

As I fly my glider far and high, I was wondering if the 2.4g is having a shorter range than 72? Not that I can see it 1km away but just wanted to know as I just move to 12FG 2.4 from my 9C.
Old 09-15-2008, 05:34 AM
  #2  
BarracudaHockey
My Feedback: (11)
 
BarracudaHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 26,991
Received 351 Likes on 281 Posts
Default RE: Does 2.4 have shorter range than traditional 72mhz?

Theoretically yes.

Practically, no.

They both work beyond visual range.
Old 09-15-2008, 11:17 AM
  #3  
dirtybird
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Tan Valley, AZ
Posts: 5,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Does 2.4 have shorter range than traditional 72mhz?

The 72mhz band permits more transmitted power but to compare the range you need to know the measured signal to noise ratio of the receiver.
Maybe someone that reads this will know and respond to this post.
Old 09-15-2008, 11:35 AM
  #4  
togatoga
Senior Member
My Feedback: (42)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Singapore, SINGAPORE
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Does 2.4 have shorter range than traditional 72mhz?

Apparently range tests have shown the 2.4 system to have better range than systems on 72mhz.That said, the 2.4 system is more line of sight than the 72mhz system i.e range reduces considerably if there is an object obstructing its line of transmission. Output power required is also lower than the 72mhz system.
Old 09-15-2008, 04:04 PM
  #5  
hestvikauto
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: kristiansand, NORWAY
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Does 2.4 have shorter range than traditional 72mhz?

Hello

Her are some good info on the subject

http://www.google.com/translate?u=ht...&hl=no&ie=UTF8

Old 09-15-2008, 04:35 PM
  #6  
aeajr
My Feedback: (2)
 
aeajr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default RE: Does 2.4 have shorter range than traditional 72mhz?

I am also a glider pilot flying 3-3.4M gliders.

If you look at the World Champinship for F3J world competition. About 10% were flying 2.4. Those guys go out as far as they need to find lift.

I fly in a sailplane competition league. Again, about 10% of the active pilots are flying 2.4.

No range problems. Of course if you install it badly, your mileage will vary.
Old 09-15-2008, 05:23 PM
  #7  
flyingdan
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Bermuda Dunes, CA
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Does 2.4 have shorter range than traditional 72mhz?

I have an aerial photography business flying a fixed wing electric Rascal 110 with an Eagle Tree Telemetry system on board, one of my flight files which I have downloaded have shown my plane to be at 1480 feet altitude and downrange 2140 feet from the the radio. I fly with the Futaba 14 MZ radio. The plane also has a 5.8 video downlink system onboard as well as the 900 MHZ Eagle Tree all operating together at the same time. One flight file showed the plane to be at 3150' but that was directly overhead. It was to say the least specked out.

Hope this information helps

Dan www.desertskycam.com

Old 09-16-2008, 02:48 PM
  #8  
Peter Burgess
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: East Sussex, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Does 2.4 have shorter range than traditional 72mhz?

aeajr,
how are you guys getting on with 2.4 and moulded gliders? Any problems with high carbon fibre fuselages and range?
Just interested.
Old 09-16-2008, 06:27 PM
  #9  
Magna
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Malaysia, MALAYSIA
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Does 2.4 have shorter range than traditional 72mhz?

Thanks all for the info.

Peter

Im in a dilemma too however over at rcgroup/ezone with more glider/hotliner flyers, the feedback was no issues as long as the antennae is outside, I kind of like them look like whisker 90 degree apart in v config.

The biggest issue is heat inside the tight glider fuse. Need to ensure its ventilated.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.