Dual Receiver Question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Carrollton, KY
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dual Receiver Question
When using dual receivers, is it necessary or recommended to separate the receivers and antennas by a certain amount? Or does it not matter? I'm referring to 72Mhz.
#5
Senior Member
RE: Dual Receiver Question
ORIGINAL: wings When using dual receivers, is it necessary or recommended to separate the receivers and antennas by a certain amount? Or does it not matter? I'm referring to 72Mhz.
Alan's Hobby, Model & RC FAQ Web Links
Regards
Alan T.
#6
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: , CT
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Dual Receiver Question
To amplify the good advice from Alan; multiple receivers (or diversity systems with multiple antennas) are aimed at preventing signal loss due to shadowing from an object (eg engine or battery pack) and polarization issues. At higher frequencies like the 2.4 Ghz range, the polarization of the receiver and transmitter antenna makes a significant difference. They should idealy match but that is impossible while a model is cavorting about. So best to orient antennas orthogonal (90degree) to each other to cover all possible polarization combinations. For shadowing, it is best to get the antennas as far away from the motor and battery as feasible and preferably separate them from each other. That way, when one is shielded, another is receiving.....Obviously, keep an eye on CG while you do this!
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Carrollton, KY
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Dual Receiver Question
ORIGINAL: Star7
To amplify the good advice from Alan; multiple receivers (or diversity systems with multiple antennas) are aimed at preventing signal loss due to shadowing from an object (eg engine or battery pack) and polarization issues. At higher frequencies like the 2.4 Ghz range, the polarization of the receiver and transmitter antenna makes a significant difference. They should idealy match but that is impossible while a model is cavorting about. So best to orient antennas orthogonal (90degree) to each other to cover all possible polarization combinations. For shadowing, it is best to get the antennas as far away from the motor and battery as feasible and preferably separate them from each other. That way, when one is shielded, another is receiving.....Obviously, keep an eye on CG while you do this!
To amplify the good advice from Alan; multiple receivers (or diversity systems with multiple antennas) are aimed at preventing signal loss due to shadowing from an object (eg engine or battery pack) and polarization issues. At higher frequencies like the 2.4 Ghz range, the polarization of the receiver and transmitter antenna makes a significant difference. They should idealy match but that is impossible while a model is cavorting about. So best to orient antennas orthogonal (90degree) to each other to cover all possible polarization combinations. For shadowing, it is best to get the antennas as far away from the motor and battery as feasible and preferably separate them from each other. That way, when one is shielded, another is receiving.....Obviously, keep an eye on CG while you do this!
Thanks star. But what you are talking about is for spread spectrum radio equipment. Two receivers are (or antennas for FASST) are used because the 2.4Ghz signal gets blocked by solid objects such as the engine or landing gear etc. Not an issue with 72Mhz.
I'm talking about 72MHz dual receivers for redundancy. (nothing to do with shadowing in this case)
I was more concerned with any type of interference from having two receivers too close.
I am kinda thinking along the same lines as krayzc-RCU.
I don't quite understand how there would be interference if both receivers are receiving the same signal. How would the signal interfere with itself?
But what do I know? That's why I am asking
#8
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: , CT
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Dual Receiver Question
OOOPS! I am sorry, obviously I did not read closely enough. I have no RC experience with dual receivers in that application. I suppose that you might get some noise coupling that would provide a mixed mode interference....if that happens, it might be just as bad with power and ground leads as for antennas. At least with power and ground, you can twist the wires to minimize common mode interference and use a ferrite torroid. Can't do that for antennas obviously. sorry! shot my keyboard off out of turn
#9
Senior Member
My Feedback: (31)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kannapolis,
NC
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Dual Receiver Question
Wings,
This is what my set-up looks like and its not one of those pretty picture set-up like you see some of the guys post. This set up have worked well since 2002 on the 40% Extra no issues what so ever and like I said in an eailer post these ant are very close shoot just look at the pics.......
This is what my set-up looks like and its not one of those pretty picture set-up like you see some of the guys post. This set up have worked well since 2002 on the 40% Extra no issues what so ever and like I said in an eailer post these ant are very close shoot just look at the pics.......
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Carrollton, KY
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Dual Receiver Question
ORIGINAL: Star7
OOOPS! I am sorry, obviously I did not read closely enough. I have no RC experience with dual receivers in that application. I suppose that you might get some noise coupling that would provide a mixed mode interference....if that happens, it might be just as bad with power and ground leads as for antennas. At least with power and ground, you can twist the wires to minimize common mode interference and use a ferrite torroid. Can't do that for antennas obviously. sorry! shot my keyboard off out of turn
OOOPS! I am sorry, obviously I did not read closely enough. I have no RC experience with dual receivers in that application. I suppose that you might get some noise coupling that would provide a mixed mode interference....if that happens, it might be just as bad with power and ground leads as for antennas. At least with power and ground, you can twist the wires to minimize common mode interference and use a ferrite torroid. Can't do that for antennas obviously. sorry! shot my keyboard off out of turn
Don't be sorry, I appreciate you taking the time to respond. Just wasn't what I was lookin for that's all.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Carrollton, KY
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Dual Receiver Question
ORIGINAL: krayzc-RCU
Wings,
This is what my set-up looks like and its not one of those pretty picture set-up like you see some of the guys post. This set up have worked well since 2002 on the 40% Extra no issues what so ever and like I said in an eailer post these ant are very close shoot just look at the pics.......
Wings,
This is what my set-up looks like and its not one of those pretty picture set-up like you see some of the guys post. This set up have worked well since 2002 on the 40% Extra no issues what so ever and like I said in an eailer post these ant are very close shoot just look at the pics.......
Thanks Crazy,
Wow, that's a nice lookin bird! I am guessing you did your homework before taking a chance with that airplane. I think that answers my question.
I appreciate it!
Matt
#12
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: , CT
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Dual Receiver Question
The conversion scheme of a receiver mixes an internal signal (from an oscillator) with the signal feed to present the original two signals and their sum and difference. This is necessary to get the signal feed frequency down to a lower value for filtering, processing and demodulation. The difference frequency, from this mixer, is the new signal passed down the line in the receiver and is far enough away from the other three signals that it is easy to filter them out. The problem is that the oscillator signal will be radiated by the receiver and could overload its neighbor. This is how the feds in the UK can tell if you have a TV operating without the proper number of license taxes paid....they use a receiver to listen for the little transmitted signal from your TV (too much time on someone's hands). So you really really don't want two receiver antennas lying side by side because the mixers from each will overload the other and cause desensing. Sorry, I am really into this crap and sometimes can't stop myself. Yep, separate the receivers if feasible and run the antennas at 90 degrees to minimize coupling. sorry I will now crawl back into my hole
#14
Senior Member
RE: Dual Receiver Question
I should have guessed you own big birds, great photos. I neglected to mention sub section "Giant Scale, Large RC models, Twins & Multi Engines" on my web page. Unfortunately, even The Wayback Machine can no longer retrieve the two good posts on RCU by Anne-Marie Cross, then Product Support Manager for Great Planes, of how she and her husband installed dual RX and warning to separate RX antenna at differing angles.
Another good reference is
RC Installation for Large Models
Who is keith Mitchell? - check his 33% Hawker Hunter
Regards
Alan T.
Alan's Hobby, Model & RC FAQ Web Links
Another good reference is
RC Installation for Large Models
Who is keith Mitchell? - check his 33% Hawker Hunter
Regards
Alan T.
Alan's Hobby, Model & RC FAQ Web Links
#15
Junior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SAN ANGELO, TX
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Dual Receiver Question
I guess what started this is that I have a GP Pitts Special that I wish to use one receiver for the upper wing and right elev. A second receiver for the lower wing and left elev. The receivers will be about 5in. apart while each ant will run down eather side of the fuse. and double back on it self parallel about a inch apart in a plastic tube. The other ant. will do the same on the other side after looking at crazys pic I feel safe in running this set up. I'd like to thank wings for starting this thread and all of the responces.If my set up does not work, as soon as I quit crying, I let everyone know.
#16
Senior Member
My Feedback: (31)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kannapolis,
NC
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Dual Receiver Question
yeah baby! I run two different Ultimate both on one receiver and dual y-cords. The only dual set-up I have is the Extra as it use so many servos 6 total for wings and 4 total for elevators + 2 rudder and lots of battery power
PS your set up will work u will be suprised at how often someone will give advice from the start of the convo "I heard", " I think" "I would not"
PS your set up will work u will be suprised at how often someone will give advice from the start of the convo "I heard", " I think" "I would not"
#17
Junior Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SAN ANGELO, TX
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Dual Receiver Question
Thanks krazy. Nice looking birds. Right now I'm running four servos on the wings two on the elev. one on the throttle, one on the choke, one on the engine kill switch, one on pull pull on the rudder and one for the pull pull on the tail wheel. This is just something I wanted to do. Again thank you for your reply.
#18
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BadajozBadajoz, SPAIN
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Dual Receiver Question
You can look the "ABC receivers" article in www.acteurope.de
They make diversity systems (two receivers that interchange their information) in two differents frecuencies. Multiplex now make this type, and JR/Graupner too.
They make diversity systems (two receivers that interchange their information) in two differents frecuencies. Multiplex now make this type, and JR/Graupner too.