Community
Search
Notices
RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros Discussion all about rc radios, transmitters, receivers, servos, etc.

Battery Life 2.4gig vs 72 mhz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2010, 08:33 AM
  #1  
ArcticCatRider
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (6)
 
ArcticCatRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Battery Life 2.4gig vs 72 mhz

Even though I've been flying RC a while, I've kind of lagged behind the times in some respects..and just bought my first 2.4gig radio last year.

Do the Tx and Rx batteries definitively drain quicker under the new system as opposed to the old 72 megahertz system??

I am scratching my head! There's a total of 5 standard servos in this Sig 40 Star 60...nothing fancy...no binding or any wrong doing...

Anyone out there experiencing the same dilemna or am I just losing my mind?
Old 08-27-2010, 08:37 AM
  #2  
BarracudaHockey
My Feedback: (11)
 
BarracudaHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 26,991
Received 351 Likes on 281 Posts
Default RE: Battery Life 2.4gig vs 72 mhz

Transmitter wise the opposite is true, they seem to run a lot longer.

Reciever wise, no change.

One thing is more systems are coming with digital servos so they consume more power, but it's not dramatic.

Tell us more about your setup.
Old 08-27-2010, 09:28 AM
  #3  
Brendan Lugo
Senior Member
 
Brendan Lugo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Poway, CA
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Battery Life 2.4gig vs 72 mhz

I think it depends on who's radio system you are using. The systems that have two way telemetry like the Hitec Aurora 9 do use more battery since it is constantly sending data back and forth between the Tx and Rx. Lesser systems are probably comperable to the old 72 stuff.
Old 08-27-2010, 10:57 AM
  #4  
ArcticCatRider
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (6)
 
ArcticCatRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Battery Life 2.4gig vs 72 mhz

Well my setup is pretty standard issue....2 servos on the ailerons, 1 on everything else.

They are S3004....not sure if they're even digital! I have a 1000 mAh battery pack...and nothing out of the ordinary. All control surfaces center properly and there's no binding or limit issues that would strain a servo.

Maybe I just got a bum battery pack?? I'm getting 3 flights on a fresh charge. I'm used to 4 to 6 on my old system! Maybe I should change out packs and see if I get better duration..

EDIT: It is the Futaba FASST series 6 channel.
Old 08-27-2010, 11:26 AM
  #5  
BarracudaHockey
My Feedback: (11)
 
BarracudaHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 26,991
Received 351 Likes on 281 Posts
Default RE: Battery Life 2.4gig vs 72 mhz

If its a new NiMH pack it needs a formation charge and a couple of cycles before it comes up to rated capacity.

No, those aren't digis.
Old 08-27-2010, 02:12 PM
  #6  
ArcticCatRider
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (6)
 
ArcticCatRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Battery Life 2.4gig vs 72 mhz

To be honest I didn't even look to see if it was NiMH or Nicad...I will have to take a look....then run it through a cycler I guess
Old 08-27-2010, 02:29 PM
  #7  
BarracudaHockey
My Feedback: (11)
 
BarracudaHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 26,991
Received 351 Likes on 281 Posts
Default RE: Battery Life 2.4gig vs 72 mhz

BTW, I prefered SkiDoo's
Old 08-27-2010, 02:32 PM
  #8  
Rodney
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 7,769
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default RE: Battery Life 2.4gig vs 72 mhz

What are you defining as "ready for recharge"? You can safely go down to 4.6 volts under load. If you are stopping at 4.8 volts, you still have at least a half full battery. As mentioned above, you need to form charge any Nixx battery before use or after a prolonged dormant spell. That is defined as charging at 0.1C for 16 hours. It is also wise to always do one of these slow charges (0.1C for 15 to 16 hours) every few weeks or so to keep the batteries in their best shape (balanced).
Old 08-27-2010, 03:47 PM
  #9  
ArcticCatRider
Senior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (6)
 
ArcticCatRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Battery Life 2.4gig vs 72 mhz

Yah I'm stopping at around 4.8 volts...just the way I've always done it. Afraid the bottom will fall out...

Is 0.1C the same rating as the standard wall charger?? Otherwise I just bought a Venom charger that I share with my bro who's got electric stuff...


Barracuda Doo makes some nice sleds but the problem is the only reliable mill by TimeBombardier is the 600...and I crave an 800! I thought about a Gade but Cat's crossover was just too kewl to pass up
Old 08-28-2010, 11:56 AM
  #10  
Rodney
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: FL
Posts: 7,769
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default RE: Battery Life 2.4gig vs 72 mhz

Since a transmitter discharges at the same rate whether you are exercising the sticks or not, give your transmitter a full charge then (with the antenna extended if a 72 or 75 MHz unit-a 2.4GHz is always fully extended) turn it on and record the voltage every 15 minutes or so until the low voltage alarm goes off. I think you will be surprised at how long you will find that you can safely run the transmitter on a full charge.
If you have a wall wart charger that came with your system, that should suffice to do the slow charge. You might want to check the current (you can not rely very well on the printed nameplate) by putting an ammeter in series with it to find the actual value. Divide the rated capacity of your transmitter battery by that value, multiply by 1.2 and that will give you the time to do the forming charge using the wall wart. Realize that this would be only an approximation as, if the current is not a pure DC (and it rarely is on wall wart as they are usually simple full wave rectifiers with no filtering) you will get a higher current reading than actually flows as ,unless you have root square meter, the form factor will skew the reading showing higher than the actual current.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.