quietstorm_baller

I've have read a couple of post in the official R40 thread but I just need to know which one should I keep and the sad part is I've never diven any one of the cars before because I didn't have an engine to race any of them. So can I get some opinions from the drivers of these car and tell me the pros/cons of these two.

magz363

personally i would get any of those two, but the hpi 40 seems more popular in dis forum and u can get replacement parts easily.get the hpi r-40.

slideyourride90

wat dont' even try it MUGEN RACING all the way Florida state champion there is no compitition, there one of the most succesfull racing manufacturers out there, thats y i got one and there the S@#T

silent_echo

there is competeition....r40 is NATIONAL champion (Hara) but i would advise you to say just get which ever car has the best parts support in your area. which will probably be hpi, because their parts are simply everwhere

quietstorm_baller

i got an r40 and mtx-3, bascially previous verions of the two, which of them which one to sell.......i was gonna sell both then upgrade which car seems better to me and it seems like hpi is a good way to go.

ELITE913

i like hpi, but parts tend to be more expensive fore it, but i would go with what everyone else uses in ur area.

swerv512

i hear that the r40 is a tank compared to the mtx4, but i'd personally get the r40 just because they arent as popular out here in NORCAL- everyone has a mtx4 or a V1rrr and a handful of serpent 710/720s. i got the ofna gpx4 just to be a lil bit different. all of the above cars are highly competitive and i dont think that one would have more advantage over another. its all in the wrists...





i've never owned either, so take my $0.02 as a grain of salt

quietstorm_baller

hmmm i think i might go wit hpi because i like there style better the mtx-4 is a nice car but for the simple reason it came with upgrades to make ur car ready to race. The only thing wrong with hpi they keep putting out kits for the same car alot of times w/o the good stuff so they can make money off of you.

quietstorm_baller

heres some pics of my cars that i havent driven in about 2 years cause of engine lackage...lol

Mz

what about the ofna cd3 pro? what do you guys think about it? i was attracted to it because it looked like a simple layout and it has drive shafts instead of belts. is it good for racing? i was hoping to compete at my local track..........

thanks

D-Nicest

Quietstorm I used to run the r40 but then eventually i began driving the kyosho RRR, stock the r40 just took too many hop ups too keep up with the competition. Go with the mugen based off these facts, it has better parts support than the r40 in the area, The mugen has a better clutch system, you can get more help from other racers with that car, and also the drivetrain and overall weight of the car has less weight and less rotational mass than the R40. In case you did not know, there is a permanent on-road race track in brooklyn, which is always open. It's in Floyed Bennit field off of Flatbush. Also why is your camera reversing all your pictures.lol

quietstorm_baller

it not revesing the pics those are the japnese editions which are very rear....lol....i was wonderin why my cam was doin that tooo but oh well ill fix it next time.€

WalawalaStore

Hi,

The MTX-4 should be a much better car, simple in design. Recent world champ.

Regards

Joaquim

MiamizFinest

ill buy that R40 from you if u wanna sell it!!!!!!!!!