Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Results 1 to 8 of 8

  1. #1
    vertical grimmace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    ft collins , CO
    Posts
    5,666
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Old school incidence measuring?

    I was wondering what tools they used back in WW1 to measure incidence when rigging/assembling these aircraft in the field? If you look at a Fokker DVII, there is a datum line painted on the side of the fuse. Also, the wings have angle numbers at various rib locations.
    I am just curious if they had a specific tool for completing this task.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Mk27006.jpg 
Views:	2 
Size:	349.3 KB 
ID:	1808103  
    \"let\'\'\'\'s just say, they will be satisfied with less\" Ming the Merciless

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    York, UNITED KINGDOM
    Posts
    1,214
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Old school incidence measuring?

    I'd expect that a spirit level would do the job... Combined with a couple of straight lengths of timber, some string and a tiny bit of ingenuity. And the Mark One eyeball.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Auckland, NEW ZEALAND
    Posts
    1,925
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Old school incidence measuring?

    I think you will find that they were a little more sophisticated than that. Rigging boards were supplied that fit the wing at marked stations, and the fuselage was similar, the rigging line on the fuselage would have been used to level the airplane, then the rigging ('incidence') boards used to adjust the wings to the manual angles. And quite accurately too, within a 1/4 of a degree. We tend to forget that, even back then, much more time was spent maintaining these things, than actually flying them. There are still Riggers manuals available from the time that tell you just how it was done.
    Evan, WB #12.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kingston, ON, CANADA
    Posts
    521
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Old school incidence measuring?

    Occasionally you will hear of "rigger's incidence" This is the relative incidence measured using a stick on the underside of a wing. It will invariably be less than the actual aerodynamic incidence which is from the farthest point forward of the airfoil to the trailing edge. For instance at 0 degrees rigger incidence, a Fokker wing is flat on the table, but the leading edge centre is much higher and the actual aerodynamic incidence is 5 or 6 degrees. That's the reason for what may appear as a lot of incidence in the stab.

    Clear as mud?

    Martin

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    cape town, SOUTH AFRICA
    Posts
    80
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Old school incidence measuring?

    See for example this for an SE5a
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Mk24882.jpg 
Views:	4 
Size:	211.3 KB 
ID:	1809437  

  6. #6
    vertical grimmace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    ft collins , CO
    Posts
    5,666
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Old school incidence measuring?

    If you look at my pic, the Fokker DVII had the rigging manual slid into a sleeve on the side of the fuselage. That white rectangle.
    \"let\'\'\'\'s just say, they will be satisfied with less\" Ming the Merciless

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Memphis, TN
    Posts
    3,822
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Old school incidence measuring?

    With the Babylonians and Greeks doing trig and dividing circles into 360 deg and the Egyptians using protractors with basic marks, angular measurement has been around a long time. Just like we do I am sure. I am more impressed that someone got it right in the design department.

  8. #8
    SIMCO's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    N.Richland Hills, TX
    Posts
    389
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: Old school incidence measuring?

    Part of my practical test for Airframe and Powerplant licence was a Stearman with rigging board and prop protractor. if I remember correctly, we had a crate of rigging boards for each section of wing and you flipped them over for the top or bottom wing as required. I had to check wing tip incidence. Same protractor for the prop angle and by the way, check the timing on a Jacobs 985 while you are at the nose. Mostly show and tell that you understood the concept. To my new 1st AIRLINE job, Nord 262a with fabric rear flight controls. Rig boards for those as well. My chief inspector at the time had his ticket hand signed by Orville Wright. Older than dirt but knew everything!


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:24 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.