argyris

...

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQR3VsbAf_c[/youtube]

abufletcher

Superb model. Sad ending.

sebo

Beautiful plane..........heartbreaking.......are you going to rebuild?

argyris

Yes i rebuild a new and i make a mold.I will be made a new thread soon.

Nieuport nut

My Feedback: (10)

Terrific model. I hope you rebuild.

(Nice Opel GT too)

Martin

Ram-bro

My Feedback: (101)

beautiful model, sorry to see it end as it did. Do we know why it crashed?

argyris

It crushed because the canard,I had large travel on canard and stall, the next one i build it more simple.

Ram-bro

My Feedback: (101)

stall and a snap......gotcha. I like the airplanes ou model. Do you have a thing for canards?

Thunderbolt47

My Feedback: (8)

Hey Guys, it's been a while sence I posted in this thread, and I do understand the concept of this thread. After going thru pix sence my last posts , here are a few more.

Be honest, I love the critisizm.(sp?)

I put a few full scales in just for the heck of it.


Nevermind they won't post. try agian later.

argyris

Sorry from me ,I only answered
Thunderbolt47 has right.

Thunderbolt47

My Feedback: (8)

Here you go!!

bokuda

My Feedback: (7)

The red and white Taylorcraft appears to be full scale. If not, it's a perfect rendtion; I see no "tells" on it at all.

Ram-bro

My Feedback: (101)

I agree but is it a citabria?

Thunderbolt47

My Feedback: (8)

That is a Aeronca Champion. I think he said it was a 1946 model.

Anyone have any idea what the red and silver one is?

Ram-bro

My Feedback: (101)

Bellanca or Stinson

derjager

My Feedback: (15)

Fibreclassics Yak 11

rcphotog

It's a Fairchild F-24. Built from 1932 to 1946 with either an inline Fairchild Ranger ( as much as 200hp ) or a Warner Scarab radial of ( as much as 165hp )
...the military version was the UC-61 during WWII.

Check out Wendell Hostetler's plans of it. They build into very beautiful models. ....and aerobatic too.

Ken.

Thunderbolt47

My Feedback: (8)

That is correct.[8D]

Thunderbolt47

My Feedback: (8)

Come on guys, Do any of my photos cut the (fullscale ) mustard? Except for the last two.

Let me know what you like and don't like about the others. I would love to know so I improve on them.
Kelly

Ram-bro

My Feedback: (101)

Thunderbolt, you did something I havent seen done yet, you included2 fullsize along with the model shots. What makes the fullsize so effective and hard to tell from the models is that they filled the whole frame of the pic, giving it some presence. So with that, fill up the frame and position your shot so that you are ........ looking up at a larger subject. Hopefully this makes some sense.

Dwhart24

The shot of the corsair is also full scale owned by Jim Tobul.

I think the model shots are decent. I think the forth shot (in flight)of the A-10 is the most believable.

This look familiar?



DSC_0806 by dwhart24, on Flickr

Dwhart24

Here are the larger pics that Steve posted above. For some reason they are very small on my computer.


DSC_6756 copy by dwhart24, on Flickr


DSC_4143 copy by dwhart24, on Flickr

Thunderbolt47

My Feedback: (8)

Yes, the corsair is also the real deal.

My lens really is my weak link. I though a $500 lens was good. But it only gets you decent shots.

Thanks for the comments.

SDCrashmaster

That's pretty funny cause I thought the Corsair was the biggest fail of all those shots. Looked the most like a flying model.

sebo

Yep...it appears to be an electric by looking at the prop shaft and spinner hub....I agree with you. Needs a wire from the antenna post to the vertical stabilizer too. I think our leg is being pulled.