FlyerInOKC

My Feedback: (6)

Looks great, needs gear doors!

DaveGee

Nice looking plane. I like the bomb drop caught on-camera. One minor point for future reference. On the photos of the right side of the aircraft, the squadron code letters should be "WZ", not ZW. This is a common error because very few planes were photographed on the right side, so unless you know about squadron codes being the same on both sides, you'd have to guess what it looked like. "WZ" refers to an aircraft assigned to the 84th Fighter Squadron, 78th Fighter Group out of Duxford England in WWII. The single letter aft of the star and bar on the fuselage was the individual aircraft letter, unique to that aircraft. If you see a bar below the individual aircraft letter, that means that there was more than one assigned to the squadron with that identification.

cheers

davegee

smcouch77

Come on, tabash! What part of that cub even vaguely looks real? And the Viper? You just don't get it, do you?

abufletcher

It's a DH4. Maybe the pilot just stepped out for a smoke.

jetpropdlx

I ll will give it another try with a few pictures taken by M Chambers of my staggewing

David Bathe

That's one nice looking plane. With a decent engine (read power), the models fly staggeringly well too don't they.
Sorry for the pun but they do.
Interesting to note that the F3A guys discovered only a few years ago that if they added a small wing behind the canopy, alined approximately with the trailing edge of the lower wing, it dramatically improved performance/ earodynamics.
What goes around, comes around.

Sorry for the non scale picky BTW. Descriptive purpose only... you understand

tailskid

My Feedback: (34)

Small? That is one huge 'wing'

rcphotog

Sunday's time machine takes us back to 1929 where Benny Howard conducts speed trials with his "PETE" racer the DGA-3

AJS10

I obtained a FunAero SE5a kit (fuselage mostly built) with some plans but without a manual. Do you still have yours that I could get a copy of?

uncljoe

My Feedback: (8)

Me 262

FlyerInOKC

My Feedback: (6)

Unclijoe those two pictures are so close it hurts. Great job!

uncljoe

My Feedback: (8)

Thank you , Have a great flying site that has a LOT of Heavy Iron.
Semper Fi

Dwhart24

A few from FL Jets.

DSC_6428 by dwhart24, on Flickr

DSC_5846 by dwhart24, on Flickr

DSC_5290 by dwhart24, on Flickr

DSC_4738 by dwhart24, on Flickr

david polley

Awesome Shots David.... Love the one with the moon in the background..... Very nice photos indeed.

tabash

My Feedback: (3)

Amazing shots David. Is that a scale moon or a real moon love that photo and the one with the drag chute

Dwhart24

Thanks guys! Another "ok" moon shot. Unfortunately these moon shots are severely cropped.

DSC_6105 by dwhart24, on Flickr

FlyerInOKC

My Feedback: (6)

Amazing! It's hard to believe they are not full size!

Chad Veich

My Feedback: (60)

I would say that Mr. Hart certainly fully grasps the concept of this thread! Great shots David, thanks for sharing them.

Dwhart24

Thanks Chad!

stevegauth30

The blue angle shot with the moon is mind blowing. That's a money shot if I ever saw one. Beautiful work.

Dwhart24

Thanks Steve!

abufletcher

Is that exhaust-haze shot unmanipulated? If not, that's my favorite of the bunch (and they're all amazing).

Dwhart24

That heat haze is part of the shot. Nothing added.

abufletcher

That's what I thought! Fantastic image. I know a lot of time, the tack-sharp photos get all the praise but these other types of photos can sometimes be more evocative of the feel and even weight of the full-scale. The fact that I can't quite make out all the detail, makes it all the more appealing to me.

roydefiant