Turnigy 9 channel Transmitter
IK chaps has anyone tried this transmitter, what are your experiences is connecting to the receiver a problems more to the point does the thing work and is it as good as Futaba
http://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...Firmware_.html
Russ
Cheers,
Wade
Cheers,
Wade
Don't know if they do this to all items but when I bought an ESC from them after 2 minutes reading about said ESC a window
popped up with a lower price if you buy now.
I think its a great radio and I would certainly use it for any tank no matter how expensive. I would be more concerned about flying vehicles where if something happened with the radio you might crash into a house or a person
No one has answered my question as to is this a true 2.4 or does it need the provided module to make it 2.4. If so i would prefer a true 2.4 system. With some very expensive models Cheap radios are not an option for me and many other people. Value is great but that needs to coincide with reliability.
@Jeff489 - There are fail-safe setting in the radio setup for each channel. I don't know if you mean something else.
Russ
I never said the transmitter didn't have failsafe, I said the rx did not (and there is no failsafe unless both rx and tx do...)
Here's my source on this. Read page 3, "receivers", about 3/4 down on the page where it states...
"Unfortunately, the receiver has no failsafe so, regardless of whether it has good range and even if the loss of the satellite doesn't compromise its ability to cope with shadowing and multi-pathing, this is a system for *small* models only...."
I read your reference - thanks. It does clear some things up for me, but I am still confused about the RX failsafe issue, because the Turnigy user manual states on this:
"The submenu "FAILSAFE" The failsafe function to define what behavior the receiver should
adopt towards the servos when there is a breakdown of the emission beam."
To me that sounds like a receiver failsafe, unless by receiver failsafe you mean something that happens if the receiver completely stops working - unrelated to the signal strength - which I would think would require a redundant power supply and some kind of redundant circuitry inside the receiver. Maybe I don't understant what receiver failsafe really means.
Anyway thanks for the reference,
Russ
The Turnigy 9x is nothing new, and has been around for a few years, but under a different name. It is an old "FlySky" system rebranded as "Turnigy" by Hobbyking.
I never said the transmitter didn't have failsafe, I said the rx did not (and there is no failsafe unless both rx and tx do...)
Here's my source on this. Read page 3, "receivers", about 3/4 down on the page where it states...
"Unfortunately, the receiver has no failsafe so, regardless of whether it has good range and even if the loss of the satellite doesn't compromise its ability to cope with shadowing and multi-pathing, this is a system for *small* models only...."
You are correct on your understanding of "failsafe". It's what the rx does when the rx loses the signal (a.k.a. "emission beam") from the tx. Loss of rx power isn't an issue, as all of these tanks have a BEC (battery elimination circuit) that uses the main power supply to power the rx (versus a rx 4.8v power pack). So, if the rx loses power, so did the tank.
You might email HobbyKing to investigate the issue further, and share their answer with us. It is possible that they have upgraded or changed the rx in their 9x package since the review was done (reveiw date was 22 June, 2010), and the review was done a considerable time ago. You never know.
Thanks again,
Russ
Russ,
You are correct on your understanding of "failsafe". It's what the rx does when the rx loses the signal (a.k.a. "emission beam") from the tx. Loss of rx power isn't an issue, as all of these tanks have a BEC (battery elimination circuit) that uses the main power supply to power the rx (versus a rx 4.8v power pack). So, if the rx loses power, so did the tank.
You might email HobbyKing to investigate the issue further, and share their answer with us. It is possible that they have upgraded or changed the rx in their 9x package since the review was done (reveiw date was 22 June, 2010), and the review was done a considerable time ago. You never know.
Myself, I try to stay away, as it invariably costs me money each visit as well. Still, they are hard to beat on some stuff. I generally get all my batteries from them.