Clark TK22G1/G2 and RC modern tanks?
#1
Clark TK22G1/G2 and RC modern tanks?
Greetings,
Clark releases his TK22 G1/G2 awhile ago. From the published official youtube videos, the added horizontal
and vertical gun barrel stabilization looks very promising. I know you could achieve the same functions by using
flight control gyros, but this probably won't be a simple plug-and-play job.
That being said, has anyone tested the new board yet? I'm really curious how the new TK22 G1/G2 works in
real application.
Clark releases his TK22 G1/G2 awhile ago. From the published official youtube videos, the added horizontal
and vertical gun barrel stabilization looks very promising. I know you could achieve the same functions by using
flight control gyros, but this probably won't be a simple plug-and-play job.
That being said, has anyone tested the new board yet? I'm really curious how the new TK22 G1/G2 works in
real application.
#2
Hi Holo, actually it's not that easy. I've experimented with a couple of flight gyros which never quite worked as I'd hoped. I've also tried a submarine auto leveler which was a definite improvement but I didn't manage to get it setup as I'd like! Regarding the Clark boards I cannot be of assistance.
#3
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton,
ON, CANADA
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
They look awesome but I personally have not seen one in action. Clark is pretty solid and making things work well, and relatively simply. I'd love to see a build / review though... expect more of that to happen with the HL release of the Abrams and Challenger II
#6
Hi Holo, actually it's not that easy. I've experimented with a couple of flight gyros which never quite worked as I'd hoped. I've also tried a submarine auto leveler which was a definite improvement but I didn't manage to get it setup as I'd like! Regarding the Clark boards I cannot be of assistance.
I saw a couple gyro mods on YouTube, however, as you said, there seem to be a lot of room for improvement. Plus I
am not an expert on flight control gyros. So eventually I decided to wait for Clark's TK22G.
As I see it, most gyro based gun barrel stabilization (GBS) unit to date does not look realistic. I think most terrain (except
those scaled scenes) is too rough and bumpy for RC tanks. So a decent GBS should be able to compensate the turret
motion caused by the rough landscape. I guess this requires a high speed servo and a pretty sensitive and fine-tunned gyro.
I am curious if TK22G is gyro based. From the spec, the added GBS function is provided by an additional board.
PS: I was told that TK22G is in production at the moment, and will be available probably next week.
#7
I'm a little confused - gun barrel stabilization is only for modern tanks, correct? Not something you would realistically add to WWII German armor?
Also, what's this about HL releasing the Challenger? I know Erik has one and did a video about it, but he told me HL was NOT going to release it. Has this changed? If so, maybe Erik better take one of those high dollar offers for his HL Challenger before it's too late!
Also, what's this about HL releasing the Challenger? I know Erik has one and did a video about it, but he told me HL was NOT going to release it. Has this changed? If so, maybe Erik better take one of those high dollar offers for his HL Challenger before it's too late!
#8
some armored fighting vehicle near the end of WWII. Not sure German Tigers have similar equipment installed.
Some German AFV expert may clarify for us maybe?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_stabilizer
#9
There are some interesting discussions on GBS unit implementation here:
http://www.worldaffairsboard.com/gro...abilizers.html
and
http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index....g-on-the-move/
http://www.worldaffairsboard.com/gro...abilizers.html
and
http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index....g-on-the-move/
#10
It's always the pain to us, we don't have enough resource to build demo set for promotion video, good new is that we've shipped some TK22G2 to local customer, they will film the video for us soon.
Regards,
Clark
Regards,
Clark
#13
I'm a little confused - gun barrel stabilization is only for modern tanks, correct? Not something you would realistically add to WWII German armor?
Also, what's this about HL releasing the Challenger? I know Erik has one and did a video about it, but he told me HL was NOT going to release it. Has this changed? If so, maybe Erik better take one of those high dollar offers for his HL Challenger before it's too late!
Also, what's this about HL releasing the Challenger? I know Erik has one and did a video about it, but he told me HL was NOT going to release it. Has this changed? If so, maybe Erik better take one of those high dollar offers for his HL Challenger before it's too late!
As for the Clark board I would love to do a review myself as well for my own tanks. I run all airsoft tanks myself as I have no tanker friends here in FL. I am always interested in new stuff, I spend the rest of my day after work tweaking my cars (working on a 8-10 LED bumper for night racing atm) and quads as well. I was also excited to see the new BARC4 too, I hope I get the chance to test these in the future.
#15
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZWuJWUhe5k
Here is a clip showing USS Ford FFG-54 76mm gun shooting. It clearly shows how the GBS unit compensates the ship's motion.
Man, 60 rounds per minute, that's awesome.
Speaking about autoloader, modern heavy battle tanks like M1A2, Leopard 2, Challenger 2 don't use the system, as far as I know
(correct me if I'm wrong). Anyone knows why? Is it about tank's survivability?
Man, 60 rounds per minute, that's awesome.
Speaking about autoloader, modern heavy battle tanks like M1A2, Leopard 2, Challenger 2 don't use the system, as far as I know
(correct me if I'm wrong). Anyone knows why? Is it about tank's survivability?
Last edited by HoloTheWolf; 11-05-2014 at 01:00 PM.
#16
HoloTheWolf,
Nice clip! My buddy served on the Ford and I have worked on the Ingraham's MK75 a couple of times. That gun is my baby and they will all be gone next year with the last FFG (Frigate for you non-Navy types). Bear in mind that the gun barrel stabilization is not part of the MK75 Gun Weapon System, it is from the MK92 Fire Control System (FCS). The gun control panel just responds to targeting data and the motors keep driving the gun to the same position.
Mark
Nice clip! My buddy served on the Ford and I have worked on the Ingraham's MK75 a couple of times. That gun is my baby and they will all be gone next year with the last FFG (Frigate for you non-Navy types). Bear in mind that the gun barrel stabilization is not part of the MK75 Gun Weapon System, it is from the MK92 Fire Control System (FCS). The gun control panel just responds to targeting data and the motors keep driving the gun to the same position.
Mark
#17
I'm a little confused - gun barrel stabilization is only for modern tanks, correct? Not something you would realistically add to WWII German armor?
Also, what's this about HL releasing the Challenger? I know Erik has one and did a video about it, but he told me HL was NOT going to release it. Has this changed? If so, maybe Erik better take one of those high dollar offers for his HL Challenger before it's too late!
Also, what's this about HL releasing the Challenger? I know Erik has one and did a video about it, but he told me HL was NOT going to release it. Has this changed? If so, maybe Erik better take one of those high dollar offers for his HL Challenger before it's too late!
#18
HoloTheWolf,
Nice clip! My buddy served on the Ford and I have worked on the Ingraham's MK75 a couple of times. That gun is my baby and they will all be gone next year with the last FFG (Frigate for you non-Navy types). Bear in mind that the gun barrel stabilization is not part of the MK75 Gun Weapon System, it is from the MK92 Fire Control System (FCS). The gun control panel just responds to targeting data and the motors keep driving the gun to the same position.
Mark
Nice clip! My buddy served on the Ford and I have worked on the Ingraham's MK75 a couple of times. That gun is my baby and they will all be gone next year with the last FFG (Frigate for you non-Navy types). Bear in mind that the gun barrel stabilization is not part of the MK75 Gun Weapon System, it is from the MK92 Fire Control System (FCS). The gun control panel just responds to targeting data and the motors keep driving the gun to the same position.
Mark
making the gun so versatile and flexible. Based on what you said, the MK75 does not come with the GBS? I am a bit surprised by
that. I thought whoever makes the gun for Navy should know GBS is a must-have
PS: Thanks for your and your friend's service!
#19
HoloTheWolf,
I don't want the thread to drift, but this may help some people understand how GBS works on most systems. The MK75, along with all of the other Naval gun systems work the same way, when a target is selected and the gun is assigned to a particular point in space where the round should impact the target, that data is constantly being processed to allow for range, speed, atmospheric conditions and coriolis effect. The gun itself has no gyroscopic features, as long as the gun was originally aligned correctly with the FCS, the FCS is taking all of the data for pitch and roll from the ship's gyro and providing a new location for the gun to be pointed. The gun doesn't care, it receives a differential error and drive the train and elevation motors to that new location. We see that as the barrel being "locked" on target and stays still while the ship moves around it. That is the simple explanation. I hope that helps. I work on everything from the 25MM Bushmaster chain gun, to the 5" MK45, but now as a civilian, "Best job I ever had"
Mark
I don't want the thread to drift, but this may help some people understand how GBS works on most systems. The MK75, along with all of the other Naval gun systems work the same way, when a target is selected and the gun is assigned to a particular point in space where the round should impact the target, that data is constantly being processed to allow for range, speed, atmospheric conditions and coriolis effect. The gun itself has no gyroscopic features, as long as the gun was originally aligned correctly with the FCS, the FCS is taking all of the data for pitch and roll from the ship's gyro and providing a new location for the gun to be pointed. The gun doesn't care, it receives a differential error and drive the train and elevation motors to that new location. We see that as the barrel being "locked" on target and stays still while the ship moves around it. That is the simple explanation. I hope that helps. I work on everything from the 25MM Bushmaster chain gun, to the 5" MK45, but now as a civilian, "Best job I ever had"
Mark
#21
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cambridge ON, CANADA
Posts: 1,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
send me a mail at www.immortalhobbies.com or pm me here and let me know which tank you want the G2 for