Nuremburg Toyfair 2016 NEWZ
#76
Ok, we have a pretty good contingent of soviet cold war era tanks now, its time to see some m48s or m60s. For real, so many guys of the era that drove them are retired and ripe for the hobby. Time to relase these before those vets pass on.
I drive my shermans with my lcm at the boat pond and every now and then i get a vet that says he drove them. Mostly for training or in the guard since they were not front line tanks past Korea.
I drive my shermans with my lcm at the boat pond and every now and then i get a vet that says he drove them. Mostly for training or in the guard since they were not front line tanks past Korea.
#77
Ok, we have a pretty good contingent of soviet cold war era tanks now, its time to see some m48s or m60s. For real, so many guys of the era that drove them are retired and ripe for the hobby. Time to relase these before those vets pass on.
I drive my shermans with my lcm at the boat pond and every now and then i get a vet that says he drove them. Mostly for training or in the guard since they were not front line tanks past Korea.
I drive my shermans with my lcm at the boat pond and every now and then i get a vet that says he drove them. Mostly for training or in the guard since they were not front line tanks past Korea.
#78
Was wanting a T-72 anyway so an RC ready one will be even better than transforming a plastic kit into RC 'cause those that have know it isn't THAT FUN!
It's ALL good news!
Jeff
It's ALL good news!
Jeff
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Grande Prairie,
AB, CANADA
Posts: 8,976
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Trumpeter has been into tanks for quite some time. WSN is their RC division for people who may not have been aware of this. Anyone who has a Halftrack already owns a Trumpeter
Interesting stuff about Walthersons Erik. Up until now they have been rebranders. If they truly are striking out on their own than that is good news
Interesting stuff about Walthersons Erik. Up until now they have been rebranders. If they truly are striking out on their own than that is good news
#80
Member
My Feedback: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Halifax, NS, CANADA
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder if the 1/24 scale are the formally forces of valor tanks. Funny that they would make the exact same type and version tanks. But hey if they have new electronics I might give them a chance, even though I already have at least 2 of each of the ones they showed.
Greg
Greg
#81
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: HamiltonWaikato, NEW ZEALAND
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes
on
55 Posts
Prime portal has pics from the show - http://www.primeportal.net/models/nuremberg_2016.htm
T72 is on Trumpeter Pg 3
Mal
T72 is on Trumpeter Pg 3
Mal
#82
Greg, if you're into 1/24 I have an old Abrams that's mostly in pieces but if you can use it for parts it's yours for free. It's got a complete lower hull. You might be able to use the tracks or something. Probably better to wait until I have to send something to someone in Canada and I'll include it to resend to you. That would help a lot in the postal rates department. PM me if you're interested.
#83
Any sign of Ark/Hooben?
#84
Trumpeter has been into tanks for quite some time. WSN is their RC division for people who may not have been aware of this. Anyone who has a Halftrack already owns a Trumpeter
Interesting stuff about Walthersons Erik. Up until now they have been rebranders. If they truly are striking out on their own than that is good news
Interesting stuff about Walthersons Erik. Up until now they have been rebranders. If they truly are striking out on their own than that is good news
#88
A lot of talk, but still no pictures...
#90
What did you think about the gearbox though? Supports up to a 540 motor We should have NO MORE ISSSUES with gearing with these hopefully. High turn count 540 motors are easy to find and fairly cheap. I believe the ratio was like 16:1 but I could be wrong there. But anyways we can now let the motor do the gearing and not the gearboxes This will make scale fighting a lot more interesting IMO.
I like the looks of the gearbox... now is it going to be a quiet one? Hope so, loads of potential need to come through to re-write some RC tank history.
Jeff
#91
This one had 3 emitters. One in the barrel and one at each top corner of the launcher. Took distance down since you drop voltage to the bulbs but what a spread it had!!
#93
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: ChesapeakeVA - VIRGINIA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#94
This tank isn't one of mine. I'm not sure how he had it wired up other than knowing they were all on jst plugs so he could unplug the upper emitters when enough people started complaining mainly on having the 2 upper emitters so high as he could shoot over trees and not take a hit, was pretty funny to watch. Sorry no vid's that I know of.
#95
Sweet!
I'll sign up for a T-72 when they hit the Shelves...
As the T-72 was our Counterpart, I'm Really Needing to see an M60A3!!!
Back in 1984 I cut my Tanker Teeth on the M60A3 as a Baby Tanker (19e)...
I was 17 years old and the T-72 was the closest thing to "The Booger Man" out there for us.
I always felt that we would have been Hard Pressed going up against the T-72 in our (84-85) vintage
M60A3's. The T-72's had a bigger main gun and were a smaller/lower target than our M60's...
And there were a Lot more of them.
Once we transitioned to the M1A1 (19k) in 1986 it was pretty much Over.
-gus
I'll sign up for a T-72 when they hit the Shelves...
As the T-72 was our Counterpart, I'm Really Needing to see an M60A3!!!
Back in 1984 I cut my Tanker Teeth on the M60A3 as a Baby Tanker (19e)...
I was 17 years old and the T-72 was the closest thing to "The Booger Man" out there for us.
I always felt that we would have been Hard Pressed going up against the T-72 in our (84-85) vintage
M60A3's. The T-72's had a bigger main gun and were a smaller/lower target than our M60's...
And there were a Lot more of them.
Once we transitioned to the M1A1 (19k) in 1986 it was pretty much Over.
-gus
#96
Although I'm not sure how any of that works regarding seding the signal code. Actually, there's no advantage to having more than one emitter anyway. Just get a wider spread bulb or place the existing closer to the tube end.
#97
Parallel would be the way to go, but you're already post resistor with Tamiya's IR lead from the MFU.
Although I'm not sure how any of that works regarding seding the signal code. Actually, there's no advantage to having more than one emitter anyway. Just get a wider spread bulb or place the existing closer to the tube end.
Although I'm not sure how any of that works regarding seding the signal code. Actually, there's no advantage to having more than one emitter anyway. Just get a wider spread bulb or place the existing closer to the tube end.
#98
IF I were to build one of these and be compliant with the rules (that nasty 5 letter word) I would have the launchers on some kind of timed flashing sequence to simulate firing (bulb flasher) and just have one emitter... either in one of the tubes or in the main barrel.
That way there's no strain on the electronics having to deal with multiple bulbs.
Jeff
That way there's no strain on the electronics having to deal with multiple bulbs.
Jeff
#99
#100