RC Tanks Discuss all aspects of rc tank building and driving here!

KV85 Conversion

Reply
Old 08-31-2010, 04:33 AM
  #26
edoubleaz
Thread Starter
 
edoubleaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,811
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Tamiya Field Grey camo coat applied. I used the preshade method using the black base coat to act as the darker panel lines and filled in the center of each area.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Sq47961.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	89.8 KB
ID:	1493078   Click image for larger version

Name:	Mk25358.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	72.4 KB
ID:	1493079   Click image for larger version

Name:	Pn36366.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	69.7 KB
ID:	1493080   Click image for larger version

Name:	Sp45308.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	72.5 KB
ID:	1493081  
edoubleaz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 06:33 AM
  #27
Tankan
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC
Posts: 62
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Danger !!! KV-85 - has notMG in front hull - on the left!
OnlyfixedMGdriver on the right.
regards
Tankan
Tankan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 09:08 AM
  #28
Jeff489
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,209
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion


Quote:
Danger !!! KV-85 - has not MG in front hull - on the left!
Only fixed MG driver on the right.
This KV-85 conversion is consistent with the KV-85 specimen on display in Kubinka. 

That's good enough for me.http://www.armchairgeneral.com/rkkaw..._85_museum.htm
Jeff489 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 09:39 AM
  #29
Panther F
 
Panther F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Franklin, IN
Posts: 9,100
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Tankan

Danger !!! KV-85 - has not MG in front hull - on the left!
Only fixed MG driver on the right.
regards
Tankan
YUP, pretty well known fact. Besides ... you don't use the MG in IR tank battling.

Come on SU-100!!!!!!


- Jeff
Panther F is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 09:47 AM
  #30
HondoBob
 
HondoBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Hereford, AZ
Posts: 212
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

If you go to this page and scroll to the bottom you will see a diagram clearly showing a KV85 will a bow mg.
http://www.armchairgeneral.com/rkkaw...V/KV_85_bp.htm

Perhaps the KV85 in Kubinka museum is special?  I hope so!
http://www.armchairgeneral.com/rkkaw...Kubinka_06.jpg
HondoBob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 09:53 AM
  #31
Panther F
 
Panther F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Franklin, IN
Posts: 9,100
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

I don't go by diagrams (that is an artist's mistake) but by using photographs.

http://www.armchairgeneral.com/rkkaw...s/KV/KV_85.htm


- Jeff
Panther F is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 10:04 AM
  #32
HondoBob
 
HondoBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Hereford, AZ
Posts: 212
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Yep, diagrams can be faulty, though I thinkthis diagramisa rendering ofthe actual tank in Kubinka. Could this be a manufacturing anomaly? Or a battlefield mod/repair?
http://www.armchairgeneral.com/rkkaww2/galleries/KV/KV_85/museums/KV_85_Kubinka_06.jpg
HondoBob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 11:57 AM
  #33
Tankan
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC
Posts: 62
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion



Kubinka KV tank not KV-85 !!!!! In Kubinka is KV-1S with test 85 mm gun. KV-85 is imposedammunitionfor tank gun in a place where he had a position in the KV-1 / 2 machine gunner .Logically - why not a machine gun on the left side of the hull.
Only preserved KV-85 is located on the memorial in Avtovo - Saint Petersburg . Unfortunately, he was quite poorly restored after the war and was welded onto thegunport with machine gun on the left side of the hull. Since then this error periodically repeated in all publications and drawings.
regards
Tankan

Tankan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 12:03 PM
  #34
Pzjgr
 
Pzjgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 609
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Wow! Awesome, simply awesome. The paint job looks great! So you used Rustoleum black and then Tamiya field gray in-between the panels, any other paint you used? I like the darker green, more menacing.

Duane
Pzjgr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 12:15 PM
  #35
HondoBob
 
HondoBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Hereford, AZ
Posts: 212
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion


Quote:
ORIGINAL: Tankan



Kubinka KV tank not KV-85 !!!!! In Kubinka is KV-1S with test 85 mm gun. KV-85 is imposedammunitionfor tank gun in a place where he had a position in the KV-1 / 2 machine gunner .Logically - why not a machine gun on the left side of the hull.
Only preserved KV-85 is located on the memorial in Avtovo - Moscow. Unfortunately, he was quite poorly restored after the war and was welded onto thegunport with machine gun on the left side of the hull. Since then this error periodically repeated in all publications and drawings.
regards
Tankan
Yes Sir, I think you are correct.

HondoBob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 01:33 PM
  #36
edoubleaz
Thread Starter
 
edoubleaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,811
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

I didn't know enough about this tank to make that fix. I guess I should have more closely at the model pics on the box. Oh well. I will stick to Sherman's from now on.
edoubleaz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 01:41 PM
  #37
Jeff489
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,209
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Quote:
Kubinka KV tank not KV-85 !!!!! In Kubinka is KV-1S with test 85 mm gun. KV-85 is imposedammunitionfor tank gun in a place where he had a position in the KV-1 / 2 machine gunner .Logically - why not a machine gun on the left side of the hull.
Only preserved KV-85 is located on the memorial in Avtovo - Moscow. Unfortunately, he was quite poorly restored after the war and was welded onto thegunport with machine gun on the left side of the hull. Since then this error periodically repeated in all publications and drawings.
All the evidence shown so far shows that the only 2 KV-85's surviving today actually have MG's in the bow position. How about sharing some of your sources so we could get this right? I'm specifically interested in what information you based the following assertions upon:

1. The KV-85 that is in Kubinka is actually a KV-1S with a "test" 85mm cannon mounted. What's your source for this? I checked the Kubina tank museum's official website http://www.tankmuseum.ru/p1.html and note that the Kubinka tank museum is calling their tank a KV-85 (which is further identified by the museum's website as a KV-1S chassis with an 85mm cannon). I don't see any mention about the cannon being a "test" or experimental model. If the Russians (who built it) are calling that tank a KV-85...(and they are), I say ok, it's a KV-85. I note that many wartime photos show other KV-85s with the bow mg plugged (ostensibly to facilitate ammunition stowage), but also I think it is probable that there were some non-typical KV-85 prototypes that retained the bow MG and were built on a KV-1S chassis...and at minimum, Kubinka has one.

2. The KV-85 (on the pedestal) in Avtovo (Saint-Petersburg)http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...front_view.jpg has had a inaccurate restoration during which a MG was incorrectly added to the bow position. What's your source for this? You're talking about the one on the pedestal right? I think that your claim could be correct, but...I'd like to know how you know this, so we could all be sure.
Jeff489 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 02:53 PM
  #38
edoubleaz
Thread Starter
 
edoubleaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,811
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Lightened the tank with a dusting of Polly scale British brown drab. I will go over with a very thin coat of Tamiya Field grey to blend it all together.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Us55157.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	70.4 KB
ID:	1493303   Click image for larger version

Name:	Yw68567.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	68.7 KB
ID:	1493304  
edoubleaz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 02:55 PM
  #39
Tankan
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC
Posts: 62
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

1. KV-85 versus Kubinka is a mistake.


The Russians produced two prototypes KV-1S with 85 mm cannon.
Were rejected by the military - a few places in the interior.
Two further prototypes of the new big tank turret- the chassis of the KV-1S. On these prototypes were covered hole on the gun.



prototype KV-1S with 85 mm cannon





prototype KV-85 with new turret and KV-1S hull - blasting test






production KV-85




regards
Tankan
Tankan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:29 PM
  #40
Jeff489
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,209
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

I'd like to know what information has made you believe that the Kubinka KV-85 and the Avtovo KV-85 are both inaccurate or "mistakes".  That's what interests me because this information does not appear to be readily available from any source I have access to.  Please share.
Jeff489 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 03:47 PM
  #41
Tankan
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC
Posts: 62
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Basic books for KV tanks





regards
Tankan
Tankan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 04:01 PM
  #42
Jeff489
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,209
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Your evasiveness is disappointing.  I had hoped to learn.  Good day, sir.
Jeff489 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 05:15 PM
  #43
Pzjgr
 
Pzjgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 609
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Looks great Ethan, your painting skills are amazing.

As far as the debate goes for the accuracy of my KV-85, I like the MG to stay on. I appreciate both sides of the argument/discussion. Ethan did a great job and I for one love what he did. I also agree with Jeff: "it's good enough for me".

Ethan do you think it's possible to paint on numbers like this KV-85?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Vt57607.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	161.6 KB
ID:	1493366  
Pzjgr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 05:59 PM
  #44
Jeff489
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,209
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

FYI, for those of us who don't speak Russian (which is most of us), the books pictured above are "History of KV Tanks, Part 1, and Part 2" (published in 2001) respectively, by author and tank collector, Mr.Maxim Kolomiets.

As to the issues discussed, here's my findings...and proof.

The so called "mistake" on the Avtovo, St. Petersburg Kv-85 appears to be a genuine mistake on a restoration and is discussed in the following:

Quote:
The firstKV-85s were re-worked from excess KV-1S hulls, welding up the hole for the ball-mounted hull machine gun. The incorrect opinion has appeared in Western literature that there was a "second version" of the KV-85 with a flexible front machine gun. This confusion most likely arose as a result of study by Western experts of the onlyKV-85 tank that has been preserved to this day (monument in Avtovo, St.Peterburg), where a mistake was made in the restoration process.
Taken from website http://www.battlefield.ru/index.php?...d=49&Itemid=50 . Sources for this information are given in the website.

As to the "test" status of the Kubinka KV-85, it appears that it may or may not be a real KV-85 depending on who you believe. It does seem to be THE prototype that led to the KV-85 series:

Quote:
Four tanks (two JS and two KV-1S) armed with the 85 mm S-31 and D-5T guns were tested jointly. This test demonstrated the great operational superiority of the D-5T gun and it was accepted for armament. For these tests the S-31 gun was mounted in the standard KV-1S turret with minimal reworking. The crew had been reduced to four men. This tank (Object 231, serial number 30751-51) is now preserved at the VIM BTVT at Kubinka.
(See id.) Sources for this information are given in the website.

So...it appears that the ball mounted MG existed on at least one example. Whether you call the Kubinka specimen a KV-1S (which it appears to be...mostly) or a KV-85 (which the museum calls it) is up to you. Looks like the only difference between the early KV-85s (i.e. the early ones based on the KV-1S chassis) and the one in Kubinka is that production models had the MG removed and plugged. As I said before, if Kubinka says its a KV-85, then that's good enough for me.

Unfortunately, I couldn't find any sources that seemed to quote Mr. Kolomiets (or his above mentioned books) on this subject...but that doesn't mean he hasn't discussed it in his writings (which are extensive).









Jeff489 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 06:09 PM
  #45
Panther F
 
Panther F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Franklin, IN
Posts: 9,100
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Ummm (cough cough) it's looking great so far Ethan! I wish I had took the plunge on one now. (I think I already said that though. ) Guess I'm just stuck with a KV-1.


- Jeff
Panther F is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 06:31 PM
  #46
yellowshaker
 
yellowshaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: bayonne, NJ
Posts: 4,333
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Ethan, that paint work is great. I have to try that on my next build. I really like the subtle way the black shows through and defines the edges of the tank. Great work sir!
yellowshaker is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 07:06 PM
  #47
edoubleaz
Thread Starter
 
edoubleaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,811
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Duane,

Anything is possible. I believe you wanted to collect it tomorrow. Have you built the lower hull yet?
edoubleaz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 08:17 PM
  #48
Pzjgr
 
Pzjgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 609
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Ethan,

Going to use my KV-1 lower hull and use the KV-2 for my SU-152.
Pzjgr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2010, 09:32 PM
  #49
HondoBob
 
HondoBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Hereford, AZ
Posts: 212
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Whoa, THE KV-85 prototype?!? Actually, that makes perfect sense! I heard that the Avtovo memorial was pieced together as best they could from what they had at the time which explains the understandable detail errors,and it makes perfect sense that the Kubinka tank is in such good shape because it was theKV-85proof of concept . . . a one of a kind treasure. Seen with this new perspective I thinkthis could quitepossibly the ultimate WWII RC tank. Wow!
HondoBob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2010, 12:41 AM
  #50
Tankan
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC
Posts: 62
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default RE: KV85 Conversion

Jeff, several references to your trying to explain the situation.
Your claim about the existence of KV-85 Kubinka museum is a mistake - based on the mislabeling on the web site.
Again and understandable for you - KV-85 tank is chassis KV-1S - a large turret - the turret ring to the hull - and 85 mm gun D-5T ing.Petrova designer.
Everything else is just a test tanks.
Your stubborn claim that Kubince is KV-85 to deceive the modelers what goes wrong then the model tank.
regards
Tankan
Tankan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:54 PM.