Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
#1
Thread Starter
Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
Now finally Wild Hare RC has a Warbird to offer, a F6F Hellcat.
The Hellcat is a very under reported and most overlooked navy fighter. The Hellcat has a high record of kills and was loved by it's drivers. The folding wing was manual - that kept the weight down for more fuel and ordnance.
The F6F was the last development - the last Hellcats were phased out in May 1961 (five month before I was born).
Now the WH F6F:
First impression was, this airplane looks cool. The color is nice and I found no wrinkles. The packaging is superb, everything is double boxed. I will build the "regular" cowl version. WH offers a slightly longer cowl to move the engine forward. This makes it possible to balance the airplane without dead weight. We will see how much weight I have to add to the DA 50 as power plant.
Alright, stay tuned for some fun....
Pictures
1 the fuse stand up on the bench waiting to get undressed
2 like I mentioned, all wrapped nicely
3 yep I like Hellcats too...
4 the hardware as it comes from WH
5 ahhh, what a undercarriage - slowly the east catching up with the machine skills
6 the fuselage is straight and no warping in the control surfaces
7 like on all ARF's I will apply CA to all mayor joints - very sturdy build turtledeck
8 plenty room for everything - space for the fuel cell to sit close to the CG
9 even a dummy engine in the kit
10 opening for flap and aileron servo hatches
11 one major improvement, split wing bays
12 most blind nuts are installed
The Hellcat is a very under reported and most overlooked navy fighter. The Hellcat has a high record of kills and was loved by it's drivers. The folding wing was manual - that kept the weight down for more fuel and ordnance.
The F6F was the last development - the last Hellcats were phased out in May 1961 (five month before I was born).
Now the WH F6F:
First impression was, this airplane looks cool. The color is nice and I found no wrinkles. The packaging is superb, everything is double boxed. I will build the "regular" cowl version. WH offers a slightly longer cowl to move the engine forward. This makes it possible to balance the airplane without dead weight. We will see how much weight I have to add to the DA 50 as power plant.
Alright, stay tuned for some fun....
Pictures
1 the fuse stand up on the bench waiting to get undressed
2 like I mentioned, all wrapped nicely
3 yep I like Hellcats too...
4 the hardware as it comes from WH
5 ahhh, what a undercarriage - slowly the east catching up with the machine skills
6 the fuselage is straight and no warping in the control surfaces
7 like on all ARF's I will apply CA to all mayor joints - very sturdy build turtledeck
8 plenty room for everything - space for the fuel cell to sit close to the CG
9 even a dummy engine in the kit
10 opening for flap and aileron servo hatches
11 one major improvement, split wing bays
12 most blind nuts are installed
#2
Thread Starter
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
....here is the link for Wild Hare RC, http://wildharerc.com/
#3
Senior Member
My Feedback: (-1)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bad Lippspringe, 1944, GERMANY
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
I would go further & say it was a better aircraft then the Corsair. but alas gov' contracts
nice bird, looking foward to your build.
#5
Senior Member
My Feedback: (8)
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
ORIGINAL: Experten109/40
I would go further & say it was a better aircraft then the Corsair. but alas gov' contracts [img][/img]
nice bird, looking foward to your build.
I would go further & say it was a better aircraft then the Corsair. but alas gov' contracts [img][/img]
nice bird, looking foward to your build.
But The HellCat wasn't fast enough to catch the kamakaze planes. That was one of the major factors that got the Corsairs on the carriers, as the Navy considered them not safe for carrier operations.
Hey Pete, are you going to build it as is?
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (-1)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bad Lippspringe, 1944, GERMANY
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
in what universe was the zero faster? the F6F was faster in level flight, and most certainly faster in
a dive. and it was just as manuverable as the zero.
a dive. and it was just as manuverable as the zero.
#7
Senior Member
My Feedback: (8)
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
ORIGINAL: Experten109/40
in what universe was the zero faster? the F6F was faster in level flight, and most certainly faster in
a dive. and it was just as manuverable as the zero.
in what universe was the zero faster? the F6F was faster in level flight, and most certainly faster in
a dive. and it was just as manuverable as the zero.
The ones that where loaded with explosives and diving for the carriers. Looks it up.
Also that's what they said on the military channel.
#8
Thread Starter
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
ORIGINAL: Thunderbolt47
Hey Pete, are you going to build it as is?
Hey Pete, are you going to build it as is?
#11
Thread Starter
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
ORIGINAL: LDM
pete , who makes the one hanging up in your shop !!! ??very cool
pete , who makes the one hanging up in your shop !!! ??very cool
http://www.flyingmule.com/products/BB-21725
#12
Thread Starter
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
ORIGINAL: n8622t
...., hope you don't mind , can I post with ya?
Jimmy
...., hope you don't mind , can I post with ya?
Jimmy
#13
Thread Starter
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
Some of you wonder how accurate the scale outlines are on this bird - well, I blew the drawings up and put the parts on top. The airplane does not only look nice from the inside it matches the outlines. There are two little flaws - if they are not pointed out you can't see it without the plans directly on top. The scale outline earns here 90 points. That is darn good for an ARF.
The wheels could be a little larger - down the road I will address that again.
The wheels could be a little larger - down the road I will address that again.
#14
My Feedback: (8)
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
Hey Pete, just unpacked mine and got the same surprise, nothing broken and packed very well Check the size of these elevators, no wonder the word was out that this bird would 3D Just what we need, a warbird hanging on the prop!! The CMP AT-6 is one Im doing for a friend so I put it next to the Hellcat fuse...wow and thats the TopFlite GS P-47 cowl next to the Hellcats cowl...wow again
#18
Thread Starter
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
Jimmy, the F6F was 2 feet wider than the Jug. The WH Hellcat scale is 1 : 6.11 - the Topflite is 1 : 5.75. The full scale airplanes shared the same P&W R2800 engine with some modifications.
I held the DA50 in the cowl kinda lost in there hehe.
I held the DA50 in the cowl kinda lost in there hehe.
#21
Thread Starter
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
ORIGINAL: n8622t
Nice Pete! Based on the wheel well how much larger a wheel do you think will fit without modifying the wheel well?
Nice Pete! Based on the wheel well how much larger a wheel do you think will fit without modifying the wheel well?
ORIGINAL: n8622t
Hey Pete, you plan on using any of Fritzdezings riviets?
Hey Pete, you plan on using any of Fritzdezings riviets?
ORIGINAL: n8622t
Pete, Nice diagram of the Hellcat
Pete, Nice diagram of the Hellcat
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: stony point, NY
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
soerry but the hellcat was well under 400 mph but was a superb fighter.,,,,the coraiar was well over 400.
#23
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hermitage, TN
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
G-Pete,
I was looking at the picture of the inside of the fuselage as it goes down toward the tail. What material is being used for the turtledeck? Iam having a difficult time telling what the fuselage skin is on different parts; wood, composite, film.
I was looking at the picture of the inside of the fuselage as it goes down toward the tail. What material is being used for the turtledeck? Iam having a difficult time telling what the fuselage skin is on different parts; wood, composite, film.
#24
My Feedback: (21)
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
Hellcat ate Zero's for breakfast
Hellcat stats
Maximum speed: 330 kn 610 km/ 380 mph,)
Zero Stats
Maximum speed:287 kn 533 km 331 mph
Cosair
Maximum speed: 369 kn, 684 km 425 mph
"But The HellCat wasn't fast enough to catch the kamakaze planes. That was one of the major factors that got the Corsairs on the carriers, as the Navy considered them not safe for carrier operations. "
Japan used many differenct types of kamakaze planes-i can find no stats to say that Anything was as fast as a Hellcat
Hellcat stats
Maximum speed: 330 kn 610 km/ 380 mph,)
Zero Stats
Maximum speed:287 kn 533 km 331 mph
Cosair
Maximum speed: 369 kn, 684 km 425 mph
"But The HellCat wasn't fast enough to catch the kamakaze planes. That was one of the major factors that got the Corsairs on the carriers, as the Navy considered them not safe for carrier operations. "
Japan used many differenct types of kamakaze planes-i can find no stats to say that Anything was as fast as a Hellcat
#25
Senior Member
My Feedback: (8)
RE: Hellcat F6F Wild Hare RC - G-Pete's build and review
ORIGINAL: hellcat56
Hellcat ate Zero's for breakfast
Hellcat stats
Maximum speed: 330 kn 610 km/ 380 mph,)
Zero Stats
Maximum speed:287 kn 533 km 331 mph
Cosair
Maximum speed: 369 kn, 684 km 425 mph
''But The HellCat wasn't fast enough to catch the kamakaze planes. That was one of the major factors that got the Corsairs on the carriers, as the Navy considered them not safe for carrier operations. ''
Japan used many differenct types of kamakaze planes-i can find no stats to say that Anything was as fast as a Hellcat
Hellcat ate Zero's for breakfast
Hellcat stats
Maximum speed: 330 kn 610 km/ 380 mph,)
Zero Stats
Maximum speed:287 kn 533 km 331 mph
Cosair
Maximum speed: 369 kn, 684 km 425 mph
''But The HellCat wasn't fast enough to catch the kamakaze planes. That was one of the major factors that got the Corsairs on the carriers, as the Navy considered them not safe for carrier operations. ''
Japan used many differenct types of kamakaze planes-i can find no stats to say that Anything was as fast as a Hellcat
I didn't make this up guys. sorry but it is historical facts.
In a war or a race every second counts.
Build on Pete!!