Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

The Royal Wedding

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2011, 09:40 AM
  #26  
Augie11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Berthoud, CO
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: The Royal Wedding

Thanks fellas.
Old 05-01-2011, 10:37 AM
  #27  
stuntflyr
 
stuntflyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,891
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: The Royal Wedding

MkXIV, Griffon.
MkXVI, Merlin.
MkXIX, Griffon.
Chris...
Old 05-12-2011, 06:17 AM
  #28  
alanc
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: manchester, AE, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: The Royal Wedding

lovely couple, well suited, ant the bride and groom where not bad either, as for the lanc, i had a sneak tour through it at its birthplace, at BAE systems chadderton a few years ago, it had been broken down for a re-spar, the thing looked ancient inside, full marks for keeping it flying, worth everyone of my tax pounds in the BOB memorial flight, there are many spitfires, from the baby spit, right up to the newly restord mk24, officially, they are RAF aircraft, but they belong to the nation, to be honest, i was in florida when the event was aired, saw enough of it though, biggest draw for me was the vintage Aston Martin the lovely couple went for a spin in, true british class, as for the front line fighter deployment for the fly over-i was ashamed, we have no aircraft, nimrodscrapped harrier-scrapped, jaguarscrapped, the list goes on, one day, we will be in deep do-do over these cuts, also, BAE have just closed down the plant where many many superb aircraft where born, woodford, home of the lanc, lincoln, shackleton, vulcan, open one day, shut the next, sorry to go on, but i feel a tad sad at my country at the moment
Old 05-12-2011, 11:38 AM
  #29  
tevans55
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,337
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: The Royal Wedding

Rolls Royce Griffon first flew November 1941 designated Mark IV.

Soon afterwards in an effort to rationalise the growing profusion of Spitfire mark numbers the Griffon Spit was re-designated as the Mark XX then a Mark XII. The Mark XII was essentially a Mark V or Mark XIII with room made for the Griffon.

Then they made the Mark XIV which was essentially a Mark XIII fitted with the new Griffon 65 engine that boasted a two-stage supercharger.

Now, that should be clear as mud!!!
Old 05-13-2011, 03:50 PM
  #30  
Brad330l
My Feedback: (1)
 
Brad330l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Perth WA, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: The Royal Wedding


ORIGINAL: tevans55

Rolls Royce Griffon first flew November 1941 designated Mark IV.

Soon afterwards in an effort to rationalise the growing profusion of Spitfire mark numbers the Griffon Spit was re-designated as the Mark XX then a Mark XII. The Mark XII was essentially a Mark V or Mark XIII with room made for the Griffon.

Then they made the Mark XIV which was essentially a Mark XIII fitted with the new Griffon 65 engine that boasted a two-stage supercharger.

Now, that should be clear as mud!!!
No, no, no. The Mk XIV came straight from the MK VIII airframe.
Old 05-13-2011, 05:40 PM
  #31  
tevans55
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,337
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: The Royal Wedding

Brad-
You are correct...sorry for the typo. It is Mk VIII not Mk XIII.
Old 05-13-2011, 06:08 PM
  #32  
AmishWarlord
My Feedback: (5)
 
AmishWarlord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Indian Trail, NC
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: The Royal Wedding

Funny pic making the rounds on Facebook


Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ki19921.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	61.5 KB
ID:	1608133  
Old 05-13-2011, 11:59 PM
  #33  
Brad330l
My Feedback: (1)
 
Brad330l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Perth WA, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: The Royal Wedding


ORIGINAL: tevans55

Brad-
You are correct...sorry for the typo. It is Mk VIII not Mk XIII.



Old 05-14-2011, 02:51 AM
  #34  
alanc
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: manchester, AE, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: The Royal Wedding

Cor, just re-read my post, went on a tad, didnt i? sorry guys,

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.