TF FW190 GIANT ARF
#3552
My Feedback: (8)
My airplanes are for fun, not competition, so visible cowl screws are much better to me than hidden ones that are a pain to get to. The pilot is a Dragon brand Erich Hartmann I found on FeeBay. I can't wait to fly this thing. My TF GS P-51 and P-47 both fly great and I expect the same from this 190.
#3553
Hi rcguy59! Perfectly looks! You can give the reference where bought retrakta? You aren't afraid, what will weaken screws of a canopy and will break it an air stream? I think that the pilot needs to be put slightly above, and that seems that he watches TV. Flaps when landing, it isn't necessary to lower more than 30 - 35%, there will be a fast braking and dumping on a wing. It is a widespread mistake, to follow the copy, the weight of the real plane very big, there it is necessary to reduce the speed and an enertion, in our case of it it isn't necessary. A task the flap to create additional carrying power at a small speed, additional braking with this weight of model is contraindicated.
Last edited by zadeda; 12-14-2014 at 11:39 PM.
#3554
Hi everybody. My TF FW 190 is still in construction and I have to decide about engine. I would like to install a Saito FG84 using flexible exhaust hoses supplied with engine. Does this type of installation requires firewall modification? As far I understand the firewall modification is required with Keleo Ring muffles. Is this correct ?
#3555
My Feedback: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: near Innsbruck, AUSTRIA
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
10 Posts
*Humming gently to a tune out of "the Sound of Music"*
Yes, only the Keleo needs the Mod as it will hit the Motor mount box. Without it, you can mount the engine on the existing Firewall.
Great choice of engine but I think you will miss the sound of the Keleo. I ran it with and without and the difference is like running a Lotus Elise (which sounds nice in its way) next to a Shelby GT.
Rev
Yes, only the Keleo needs the Mod as it will hit the Motor mount box. Without it, you can mount the engine on the existing Firewall.
Great choice of engine but I think you will miss the sound of the Keleo. I ran it with and without and the difference is like running a Lotus Elise (which sounds nice in its way) next to a Shelby GT.
Rev
#3558
My airplanes are for fun, not competition, so visible cowl screws are much better to me than hidden ones that are a pain to get to. The pilot is a Dragon brand Erich Hartmann I found on FeeBay. I can't wait to fly this thing. My TF GS P-51 and P-47 both fly great and I expect the same from this 190.
Roger
#3559
#3560
#3564
My Feedback: (48)
Thought I would post a few pics of the EME70 twin with factory starter that I am installing on my friends TBM Zero to replace ZDZ80 single. Not to hijack the thread but to help answer earlier questions about the engine.
Due to mishap I am replacing original long cowl with a Ziroli cowl closure to scale and much shorter so engine mount had to be shortened. The factory offset was maintained which produced considerable offset. This cowl is 9 7/8" id but since plugs angle downward the cowl must be measured lower. The engine plugs clear but caps will not. I will make small blisters and we are OK with this, you may not?
Due to mishap I am replacing original long cowl with a Ziroli cowl closure to scale and much shorter so engine mount had to be shortened. The factory offset was maintained which produced considerable offset. This cowl is 9 7/8" id but since plugs angle downward the cowl must be measured lower. The engine plugs clear but caps will not. I will make small blisters and we are OK with this, you may not?
Last edited by dmyers0403; 12-16-2014 at 08:30 PM.
#3571
Thought I would post a few pics of the EME70 twin with factory starter that I am installing on my friends TBM Zero to replace ZDZ80 single. Not to hijack the thread but to help answer earlier questions about the engine.
Due to mishap I am replacing original long cowl with a Ziroli cowl closure to scale and much shorter so engine mount had to be shortened. The factory offset was maintained which produced considerable offset. This cowl is 9 7/8" id but since plugs angle downward the cowl must be measured lower. The engine plugs clear but caps will not. I will make small blisters and we are OK with this, you may not?
Due to mishap I am replacing original long cowl with a Ziroli cowl closure to scale and much shorter so engine mount had to be shortened. The factory offset was maintained which produced considerable offset. This cowl is 9 7/8" id but since plugs angle downward the cowl must be measured lower. The engine plugs clear but caps will not. I will make small blisters and we are OK with this, you may not?
FW-190 Cowl is 272mm diameter or 10 3/4 inch diameter.
Engine with spark plug caps installed is 250mm wide or 9 7/8 inch wide.
Total clearance remaining is 22mm or 7/8 inch.
Divided by 2 for each plug cap = 11mm clearance for each plug cap or 7/16 inch clearance from inside of cowl.
Roger
Last edited by ForcesR; 12-20-2014 at 02:15 PM. Reason: Additional info
#3572
My Feedback: (48)
The FW-190 cowl is 272mm diameter or 10 3/4 inch inside diameter, larger than this cowl that you mention is 9 7/8" ID. The EME70 will fit the FW-190 cowl without any issues with plug cap clearance
FW-190 Cowl is 272mm diameter or 10 3/4 inch diameter.
Engine with spark plug caps installed is 250mm wide or 9 7/8 inch wide.
Total clearance remaining is 22mm or 3/4 inch.
Divided by 2 for each plug cap = 11mm clearance for each plug cap or 7/16 inch clearance from inside of cowl.
Roger
FW-190 Cowl is 272mm diameter or 10 3/4 inch diameter.
Engine with spark plug caps installed is 250mm wide or 9 7/8 inch wide.
Total clearance remaining is 22mm or 3/4 inch.
Divided by 2 for each plug cap = 11mm clearance for each plug cap or 7/16 inch clearance from inside of cowl.
Roger
#3573
My Feedback: (1)
Isn't the firewall angled for right thrust and the engine offset to the left to get the thrust washer centered coming out of the cowl? Won't this skew the dimensions concerning engine clearance?
Apologies in advance if this dampens someone's enthusiasm, but it seems to not be taken into consideration.
Best regards.
Apologies in advance if this dampens someone's enthusiasm, but it seems to not be taken into consideration.
Best regards.
#3574
My Feedback: (48)
Isn't the firewall angled for right thrust and the engine offset to the left to get the thrust washer centered coming out of the cowl? Won't this skew the dimensions concerning engine clearance?
Apologies in advance if this dampens someone's enthusiasm, but it seems to not be taken into consideration.
Best regards.
Apologies in advance if this dampens someone's enthusiasm, but it seems to not be taken into consideration.
Best regards.
A couple of years ago I would not have never considered plug caps sticking thru Cowl but it is no biggy anymore (getting older??) as I am not entering a pure scale contest. The smoothness of the twins are worth it. A blister cover is preferred but if not used it does not look that bad, if done neatly and painted and the airplane itself is well done. If the airplane looks crappy then the plugs look crappy!!
Last edited by dmyers0403; 12-17-2014 at 07:26 AM.