Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Easiest-To-Land Scale WWII Airplane

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Easiest-To-Land Scale WWII Airplane

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2014, 10:03 AM
  #1  
lbsjr
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: EPHRATA, PA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Easiest-To-Land Scale WWII Airplane

I have been in RC airplanes for years and have always flown sport planes. My favorite one being the Great Planes Super Sportster .40-size. It's speed is great and glide path is fantastic. During the last couple of seasons of flying, I have tried several different scale and semi-scale warplanes. The T 28 was a nightmare on approach, because if I cut the throttle too much it dropped like a rock. It did have flaps but they were a little difficult for me to use on the radio. Here's why: I am in a wheelchair due to a muscle weakness and I have limited turning ability of my neck, and limited use of my fingers on the sticks, which prevents me from flipping switches and turning knobs during flight. Turning my wheelchair with the airplane when I do flybys, or even long landings, is out of the question. I always land towards me because I cannot look over my shoulder at an airplane coming from behind me. I do fly the sport scale P 51 PTS, but I do want something that is totally scale with good flight characteristics. When I flew the T 28, I needed a friend to flip the switch for the flaps, and that is okay, but I would like to find a model that does not need a lot of manipulation on approach. I am not going to make this purchase anytime soon, so I welcome feedback for as long as this thread stays active. I am open to any suggestions on warplanes because I want to find something that has awesome landing characteristics. As for engine size, I do have an .46 AX available and on the extreme range a 3W 60 cc gas engine. I look forward to hearing your thoughts, airplane type and set up suggestions, etc..
Old 11-22-2014, 11:48 AM
  #2  
foodstick
 
foodstick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ankeny, IA
Posts: 5,600
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

If you want to go big and use that 60 cc engine.. I don't think you can do better than the Ziroli Stuka. Plus you don't have to mess with retracts.. I have never heard a single word but positive about how this airplane flies.
Old 11-22-2014, 01:23 PM
  #3  
jchorak
My Feedback: (9)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 181
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by foodstick
If you want to go big and use that 60 cc engine.. I don't think you can do better than the Ziroli Stuka. Plus you don't have to mess with retracts.. I have never heard a single word but positive about how this airplane flies.
I can attest. Had the chance to fly two different Ziroli stukas this year. To me , like flying a big trainer.
jchorak
Old 11-22-2014, 04:20 PM
  #4  
BobH
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Springfield, VA,
Posts: 8,049
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Top Flight Giant P-47 is a great flying plane. Lands at a walk. The 60 would fly it with ease. Being an arf. you can fly and just enjoy it.
Old 11-22-2014, 05:12 PM
  #5  
thailazer
 
thailazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Liberty Lake, WA
Posts: 1,566
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

How time did you give the T-28? I had a Pica version and it took me forever to land it well. Once I learned to keep the power on to touch down, and NOT use the flaps, I could land it well. The airplane is so bulky and it has a lot of drag that needs to be overcome with thrust all the way on a normal approach.
Old 11-22-2014, 06:41 PM
  #6  
STUKA BARRY
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Summerfield, NC
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

took rds out of my mouth. Been flying a Ziroli Stuka for 18yrs. now. Watch any Warbirds Over Delaware video from 1996 to present (disregard 2005, that was a test flight with a brand new JR 9303 that crapped out) and that most likely mine with the creamin siren. What a blast she is to fly, and practically lands by herself. They really are a crowd pleaser. Nick will tell you himself "its one of the best flying airplanes I've designed".WARNING: they absolutely hate crosswinds.
Old 11-22-2014, 07:44 PM
  #7  
Desertlakesflying
My Feedback: (28)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sun Valley, NV
Posts: 2,901
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

I fly Mustangs because they are the easiest for me to land.
Don't know why.
Old 11-22-2014, 08:28 PM
  #8  
rcguy59
My Feedback: (8)
 
rcguy59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: tacoma, WA
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Another vote for the TF GS P-47. No bad habits.
Old 11-22-2014, 09:06 PM
  #9  
52larry52
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ocala, Florida
Posts: 1,284
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

L-4 Cub Grasshopper, L-19 bird dog, PT-19. Not all "warbirds" are fighters with retracts. Hobby King has a 90" army green L-4 cub that is inexpensive @ $205, but not very scale accurate. Texas RC has 1/4 and 1/3 scale L-19 bird dogs in army green and white/red @ about $400 for the 1/4 scale 96" version. Aero Works (available thru Tower Hobbies) has a really nice 90" Cessna LC-126, quite scale and also quite pricey @ $999.95. The LC-126 is a very colorful military version of the late 40's Cessna 195 with a unique 3 vertical stab. feature.These are all real warbirds in a large size, just not complicated to operate fighters. Any of these would be welcome at any warbird meet including "giant scale" meets. Just a different line of thought that might work for you.
Old 11-23-2014, 02:52 AM
  #10  
Lifer
My Feedback: (1)
 
Lifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,529
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzPiCEolZ8s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dd0YoC5OKwI
Old 11-23-2014, 05:56 AM
  #11  
scoobiemario
My Feedback: (8)
 
scoobiemario's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My vote is for TF P47. Giant scale. It flies awesome. And lands very easy. Here is an example

http://youtu.be/6P_Qdc4_Ze0

Probably smoothest landing I ever made. And believe me, I was stressed.

Secend vote is for Ziroli stuka. I'm going to build one, probably by 2016 season. Collecting parts already. I've seen guys flying stukas in Delaware. They look cool. Fly easy. And there is so many paint schemes to chose from.
Old 11-23-2014, 06:47 AM
  #12  
Tony Iannucelli
My Feedback: (193)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Parrish, FL
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I vote for the P-47, 60 size and up. Second would be the AT-6, with practice, maybe on a simulator. I also had a Zero that flew really well, and a couple of Corsairs. Never had good luck with the Mustangs I've had, but maybe it was me. I've never flown a Stuka, but respect others opinions.
Old 11-23-2014, 07:33 AM
  #13  
Tampatexan
My Feedback: (86)
 
Tampatexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 52larry52
L-4 Cub Grasshopper, L-19 bird dog, PT-19. Not all "warbirds" are fighters with retracts. Hobby King has a 90" army green L-4 cub that is inexpensive @ $205, but not very scale accurate. Texas RC has 1/4 and 1/3 scale L-19 bird dogs in army green and white/red @ about $400 for the 1/4 scale 96" version. Aero Works (available thru Tower Hobbies) has a really nice 90" Cessna LC-126, quite scale and also quite pricey @ $999.95. The LC-126 is a very colorful military version of the late 40's Cessna 195 with a unique 3 vertical stab. feature.These are all real warbirds in a large size, just not complicated to operate fighters. Any of these would be welcome at any warbird meet including "giant scale" meets. Just a different line of thought that might work for you.
When I had my (full scale) Taylorcraft L2, we called all the light planes (L2, L3, L4, etc). WARBUGS ...
Old 11-23-2014, 08:01 AM
  #14  
THERCAV8R
My Feedback: (283)
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you want a fighter the TF P-47 is the best. no bad habits and has great ground handling. otherwise PT-19 or an L4 cub or L-19 birddog. how ever keep in mind with larger models one must keep a little throttle in the model until just before touchdown or they will slow down too much and stall.
Old 11-23-2014, 09:17 AM
  #15  
flycatch
Senior Member
My Feedback: (26)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Barstow, CA
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

ME-165W primary trainer
Old 11-23-2014, 12:06 PM
  #16  
lbsjr
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: EPHRATA, PA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow! Thanks for the feedback. That gives me a lot to think about. Keep the thoughts coming.
Old 11-23-2014, 12:38 PM
  #17  
irocbsa
My Feedback: (12)
 
irocbsa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

TF P-47 or the new Hangar 9 P-47 both land at a crawl. My choice would be the Hangar 9 because of the plug in wings and the fact that it's a Razorback. If you want fixed landing gear, you can't go wrong with a Stuka.
Old 11-23-2014, 01:58 PM
  #18  
scoobiemario
My Feedback: (8)
 
scoobiemario's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have H9 razorback 47 and its been great. 57 flights. Electric. Full flaps will slow it to crawl. Great plane
Old 11-23-2014, 02:26 PM
  #19  
JAYNC
My Feedback: (7)
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: newport, NC
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dont forget the new TF zero, I just got it. If you watch any of the videos it also lands slow and has wide landing gear and flies great,
Old 11-23-2014, 02:36 PM
  #20  
wnewbury
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Durant OK
Posts: 159
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

what about a P39 Aircobra with the tricycle landing gear?
Old 11-23-2014, 03:00 PM
  #21  
BobbyMcGee
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah a P-47 is a smooth landing plane, but I also had a great experience with a 90 sized Corsair. Never ground looped either.
Old 11-23-2014, 04:51 PM
  #22  
thailazer
 
thailazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Liberty Lake, WA
Posts: 1,566
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Nice flying Jug! What engine are you running in it?
Old 11-24-2014, 02:30 PM
  #23  
IFLYBVM2
My Feedback: (360)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Georgetown, SC
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Yellow P-47 was the nicest landing model I ever owned....and weight did not seem to matter much.
-Mike O.
Old 11-24-2014, 02:35 PM
  #24  
Lifer
My Feedback: (1)
 
Lifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,529
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

thailazer,

The Tarheel Hal has a DLE 55 with a stock muffler and a Bowman ring. The Hangar 9 Razorback has an Evolution/MVVS 35 with a Bisson muffler. The 55 uses a Xoar 22x10 and the other uses a Xoar 19x8.
The H-9 is 7 years old and the Top Flite is 3 years old. Neither has ever experienced any damage.
Old 11-25-2014, 01:58 PM
  #25  
lbsjr
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: EPHRATA, PA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had maybe 4 or 5 landings with the T-28. I like to land slow and I tip-stalled and crashed on the last landing. I got a little frustrated and gave it to a friend who handles flaps better than I do. I enjoyed flying it, but landing was a bear.

Last edited by lbsjr; 11-25-2014 at 02:06 PM.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.