Easiest-To-Land Scale WWII Airplane
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: EPHRATA, PA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Easiest-To-Land Scale WWII Airplane
I have been in RC airplanes for years and have always flown sport planes. My favorite one being the Great Planes Super Sportster .40-size. It's speed is great and glide path is fantastic. During the last couple of seasons of flying, I have tried several different scale and semi-scale warplanes. The T 28 was a nightmare on approach, because if I cut the throttle too much it dropped like a rock. It did have flaps but they were a little difficult for me to use on the radio. Here's why: I am in a wheelchair due to a muscle weakness and I have limited turning ability of my neck, and limited use of my fingers on the sticks, which prevents me from flipping switches and turning knobs during flight. Turning my wheelchair with the airplane when I do flybys, or even long landings, is out of the question. I always land towards me because I cannot look over my shoulder at an airplane coming from behind me. I do fly the sport scale P 51 PTS, but I do want something that is totally scale with good flight characteristics. When I flew the T 28, I needed a friend to flip the switch for the flaps, and that is okay, but I would like to find a model that does not need a lot of manipulation on approach. I am not going to make this purchase anytime soon, so I welcome feedback for as long as this thread stays active. I am open to any suggestions on warplanes because I want to find something that has awesome landing characteristics. As for engine size, I do have an .46 AX available and on the extreme range a 3W 60 cc gas engine. I look forward to hearing your thoughts, airplane type and set up suggestions, etc..
#2
If you want to go big and use that 60 cc engine.. I don't think you can do better than the Ziroli Stuka. Plus you don't have to mess with retracts.. I have never heard a single word but positive about how this airplane flies.
#3
jchorak
#5
How time did you give the T-28? I had a Pica version and it took me forever to land it well. Once I learned to keep the power on to touch down, and NOT use the flaps, I could land it well. The airplane is so bulky and it has a lot of drag that needs to be overcome with thrust all the way on a normal approach.
#6
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Summerfield,
NC
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
took rds out of my mouth. Been flying a Ziroli Stuka for 18yrs. now. Watch any Warbirds Over Delaware video from 1996 to present (disregard 2005, that was a test flight with a brand new JR 9303 that crapped out) and that most likely mine with the creamin siren. What a blast she is to fly, and practically lands by herself. They really are a crowd pleaser. Nick will tell you himself "its one of the best flying airplanes I've designed".WARNING: they absolutely hate crosswinds.
#9
My Feedback: (1)
L-4 Cub Grasshopper, L-19 bird dog, PT-19. Not all "warbirds" are fighters with retracts. Hobby King has a 90" army green L-4 cub that is inexpensive @ $205, but not very scale accurate. Texas RC has 1/4 and 1/3 scale L-19 bird dogs in army green and white/red @ about $400 for the 1/4 scale 96" version. Aero Works (available thru Tower Hobbies) has a really nice 90" Cessna LC-126, quite scale and also quite pricey @ $999.95. The LC-126 is a very colorful military version of the late 40's Cessna 195 with a unique 3 vertical stab. feature.These are all real warbirds in a large size, just not complicated to operate fighters. Any of these would be welcome at any warbird meet including "giant scale" meets. Just a different line of thought that might work for you.
#11
My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My vote is for TF P47. Giant scale. It flies awesome. And lands very easy. Here is an example
http://youtu.be/6P_Qdc4_Ze0
Probably smoothest landing I ever made. And believe me, I was stressed.
Secend vote is for Ziroli stuka. I'm going to build one, probably by 2016 season. Collecting parts already. I've seen guys flying stukas in Delaware. They look cool. Fly easy. And there is so many paint schemes to chose from.
http://youtu.be/6P_Qdc4_Ze0
Probably smoothest landing I ever made. And believe me, I was stressed.
Secend vote is for Ziroli stuka. I'm going to build one, probably by 2016 season. Collecting parts already. I've seen guys flying stukas in Delaware. They look cool. Fly easy. And there is so many paint schemes to chose from.
#12
My Feedback: (193)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Parrish,
FL
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I vote for the P-47, 60 size and up. Second would be the AT-6, with practice, maybe on a simulator. I also had a Zero that flew really well, and a couple of Corsairs. Never had good luck with the Mustangs I've had, but maybe it was me. I've never flown a Stuka, but respect others opinions.
#13
My Feedback: (86)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
L-4 Cub Grasshopper, L-19 bird dog, PT-19. Not all "warbirds" are fighters with retracts. Hobby King has a 90" army green L-4 cub that is inexpensive @ $205, but not very scale accurate. Texas RC has 1/4 and 1/3 scale L-19 bird dogs in army green and white/red @ about $400 for the 1/4 scale 96" version. Aero Works (available thru Tower Hobbies) has a really nice 90" Cessna LC-126, quite scale and also quite pricey @ $999.95. The LC-126 is a very colorful military version of the late 40's Cessna 195 with a unique 3 vertical stab. feature.These are all real warbirds in a large size, just not complicated to operate fighters. Any of these would be welcome at any warbird meet including "giant scale" meets. Just a different line of thought that might work for you.
#14
My Feedback: (283)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you want a fighter the TF P-47 is the best. no bad habits and has great ground handling. otherwise PT-19 or an L4 cub or L-19 birddog. how ever keep in mind with larger models one must keep a little throttle in the model until just before touchdown or they will slow down too much and stall.
#17
My Feedback: (12)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ann Arbor,
MI
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TF P-47 or the new Hangar 9 P-47 both land at a crawl. My choice would be the Hangar 9 because of the plug in wings and the fact that it's a Razorback. If you want fixed landing gear, you can't go wrong with a Stuka.
#22
#24
My Feedback: (1)
thailazer,
The Tarheel Hal has a DLE 55 with a stock muffler and a Bowman ring. The Hangar 9 Razorback has an Evolution/MVVS 35 with a Bisson muffler. The 55 uses a Xoar 22x10 and the other uses a Xoar 19x8.
The H-9 is 7 years old and the Top Flite is 3 years old. Neither has ever experienced any damage.
The Tarheel Hal has a DLE 55 with a stock muffler and a Bowman ring. The Hangar 9 Razorback has an Evolution/MVVS 35 with a Bisson muffler. The 55 uses a Xoar 22x10 and the other uses a Xoar 19x8.
The H-9 is 7 years old and the Top Flite is 3 years old. Neither has ever experienced any damage.
#25
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: EPHRATA, PA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had maybe 4 or 5 landings with the T-28. I like to land slow and I tip-stalled and crashed on the last landing. I got a little frustrated and gave it to a friend who handles flaps better than I do. I enjoyed flying it, but landing was a bear.
Last edited by lbsjr; 11-25-2014 at 02:06 PM.