TopRC Corsair 93in - center of gravity?
#1
TopRC Corsair 93in - center of gravity?
Hi,
Has anyone already purchased the new Corsair from TopRC? Mine arrived last week, but unfortunately, there is no manual available yet. Therefore, I would like to ask if someone already figured out the correct center of gravity?
Best Regards,
Oliver
Has anyone already purchased the new Corsair from TopRC? Mine arrived last week, but unfortunately, there is no manual available yet. Therefore, I would like to ask if someone already figured out the correct center of gravity?
Best Regards,
Oliver
#3
Over here in Europe, you can get it from bigplanes.nl or engelmt.de. However, both ship it without a manual.
I would love to share some photos. However, vBulletin tells me "You are not allowed to post URLs until you have at least 10 posts". So I have to do eight more posts before I can show something. bigplanes.nl has some nice photos.
Best Regards
Oliver
I would love to share some photos. However, vBulletin tells me "You are not allowed to post URLs until you have at least 10 posts". So I have to do eight more posts before I can show something. bigplanes.nl has some nice photos.
Best Regards
Oliver
#7
That sounds reasonable. My old Hangar 9 Corsair had 120 - 135 mm (4.5 - 5.3 in) with a wingspan of only 2.17 m (85.5 in). I was hoping for more since the TopRC Corsair seems to be very tail heavy. I am planning to mount a Moki S180 on it and it looks like I need to add additional nose weight even with this heavy engine. The natural fit is a Saito FG-90 or the UMS 7-90 mentioned above. However, those engines will require even more nose weight. The UMS 9-115 or the UMS 5-125 could also fit under the cowl.
Best Regards,
Oliver
Last edited by sg26565; 12-23-2019 at 01:57 AM.
#10
The cowl is 270 mm heigh and 265 mm wide at the fuselage. To the front, it narrows down to 250 mm. A Moki S180 (255 mm) will most likely fit, as well as a Saito FG-90 (250 mm) or a UMS 7-90 (230 mm). A UMS 9-115 (260 mm) may also fit, but it may become very tight. The UMS 5-125 (265 mm) is likely too large for this cowl.
Oliver
Oliver
#14
Some comments regarding the quality of the kit (I still can't post any photos because I need to do four more posts ):
- In my opinion, the overall quality of the kit is very good, at least far above average compared to other kits from China.
- The landing gear seems to be very robust. I have the landing gear from TopRC, not the one from Robart.
#15
However, there are also some things, that I don't like.
- The wing servos are mounted using L brackets. The same L brackets are used for the gear door servos. With two aileron, four flap and two gear door servos, we get eight in total. However, only twelve L brackets are shipped. I made four more by myself.
- There are two different kinds of hinges for the flaps. Eight of one kind and four others. However, the manual does not tell where they should go. We asked TopRC for advice and they told us that the eight go into the center wing and the other four into the outer wings.
- The pushrods for the gear doors are too short so that the doors don't close completely. I had to replace them with longer ones that I had laying around.
- The springs in the oleo struts are way too hard and too long. My oleo struts did not move at all. I had to replace the springs. When I disassembled the oleo strut, I discovered that the original springs were deformed because they had been mounted using extreme force.
#16
There are no holes for the pushrods for the ailerons and elevators. You have to cut them into the composite yourself. My result was not optimal. However, most of the time, you don't see the holes on the bottom side of the wings.
#17
I finished the assembly of my Corsair with a Moki S180. The propeller arrived today. The plane weights app. 16 kg without fuel. Therefore, Take-off weight will be around 17 kg. This is not too far away from the 16.8 kg specified in the manual. The website talks about 13 - 15 kg, which is unrealistic. Even with a smaller engine, you need to add a lot of nose weight to achieve the correct center of gravity. I prefer to carry a larger motor instead of lead .
#19
As previously mentioned, I installed a Moki S180 engine. This made mounting of the cowl a bit challenging because the ply cowl frame will not move over the engine. Instead of clueing the frame into the cowl, I attached it to the fuselage and used five threaded rods to connect it to the air guide for the engine. The air guide was then glued to the cowl. Aluminum tubes ensure the correct distance.
The cowl frame and the air guide
Mounted to the fuselage without engine
... and with engine
The air will flow close to the cylinders for a good cooling effect.
The air guide was glued into the cowl. Aluminum tubes take care of the correct distance.
Everything mounted together.
The cowl frame and the air guide
Mounted to the fuselage without engine
... and with engine
The air will flow close to the cylinders for a good cooling effect.
The air guide was glued into the cowl. Aluminum tubes take care of the correct distance.
Everything mounted together.
#20
As mentioned earlier, there are two different kinds of hinges for the flaps, but the manual does not tell which should go where. Here is a picture that we received from TopRC after we asked for advise.
Note: The hinges for the outer wings have small tooths.
Note: The hinges for the outer wings have small tooths.
#21
Finally, some words about the landing gear. I bought the original one from TopRC and this one looks quite robust. However, the springs in the oleo struts were a total disaster. The springs are too strong, too long and mine were already damaged.
My springs were already damaged because they were mounted with extreme force.
I had to replace the springs with softer ones. Ideally, you would take 100 mm springs with a spring rate of approximately 5 newtons per mm. However, I was not able to find springs with these characteristics. Therefore, I used two 50 mm springs for each side.
That's it from my side. I'm now waiting for better weather to take the new plane outside.
Regards,
Oliver
My springs were already damaged because they were mounted with extreme force.
I had to replace the springs with softer ones. Ideally, you would take 100 mm springs with a spring rate of approximately 5 newtons per mm. However, I was not able to find springs with these characteristics. Therefore, I used two 50 mm springs for each side.
That's it from my side. I'm now waiting for better weather to take the new plane outside.
Regards,
Oliver
#22
The manufacturer released new photos on his web site. The manual is now also on-line.
80CC F4U - Scale warbirds - TopRCModel SCALE WARBIRDS,JET, PATTERN, BOATS & MULTIROTOR
80CC F4U - Scale warbirds - TopRCModel SCALE WARBIRDS,JET, PATTERN, BOATS & MULTIROTOR
#24