Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Wing Loading, again

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Wing Loading, again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2017, 06:44 PM
  #1  
the Wasp
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VT
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 39 Posts
Default Wing Loading, again

My god guys, I have this VQ P-40 (62 inch span) and the manual tells NOTHING about the Wing Area or Loading,

I know people put 20cc size gassers in this size War Plane,, I was told by the seller to put my Zenoah 20cc in it, well the Zenoah 20 weigh in at 41o.z. "less" Ignition Battery,
it's frustrating, and I feel like a child having to post and ask because half the people say "no,no, don't add weight" while the other half mount big heavy engines in these small .60 size planes,, one guy told me (quote) "62 inches is a lot of Wing Area",, what ??,, to me a 41o.z. engine plus Ignition Battery sounds like a lot of weight for a 62 inch Span wing shaped like a P-40's wing,

can I get comments

thanks guys

Jim

Last edited by the Wasp; 05-11-2017 at 06:51 PM.
Old 05-11-2017, 06:46 PM
  #2  
All Day Dan
My Feedback: (5)
 
All Day Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MANHATTAN BEACH, CA
Posts: 4,606
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

What is the wing area and weight of the plane? Dan.
Old 05-11-2017, 06:51 PM
  #3  
the Wasp
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VT
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

well the manual says nothing about wing area, the VQ site says 8 pounds but doesn't say it's for flight or not

thanks for the quick reply !!

PS, I will edit above and add that about Wing Area

Jim
Old 05-11-2017, 06:52 PM
  #4  
the Wasp
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VT
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

here is VQ's P-40 page

P-40 - VINH QUANG RC MODELS

Jim
Old 05-12-2017, 12:02 AM
  #5  
Chad Veich
My Feedback: (60)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Litchfield Park, AZ
Posts: 7,677
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Much depends upon where the CG ends up. On most warbirds I would say don't worry about the weight up front as you will most likely need it there anyway. However, the P-40 is one of those that has a long enough nose that you may or may not need a bunch of weight up front in order to achieve the proper CG. I would do some preliminary testing to try and find out if the G20 will make the airplane extremely nose heavy or not. If not then the 20cc would be a fine choice for a 62" P-40. I have two 64" span Hellcats, one with a DLE 20 and one with an Evolution 20, and while they have plenty of power it is certainly not too much by any means. One is about 11 pounds and the other is about 11 3/4 pounds RTF. Both required nose weight so a lighter engine would have been a moot point. My .02 cents.
Old 05-12-2017, 01:40 AM
  #6  
Lifer
My Feedback: (1)
 
Lifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,529
Likes: 0
Received 29 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Area: Span times average chord.
Loading: Area(in square inches) divided by 155 divided by ounces.
Old 05-12-2017, 10:47 AM
  #7  
All Day Dan
My Feedback: (5)
 
All Day Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MANHATTAN BEACH, CA
Posts: 4,606
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

This will help. Dan.

Center of Gravity Calculator
Old 05-12-2017, 11:22 AM
  #8  
the Wasp
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VT
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

well the manual does tell me the Balance point is between 4 to 4&1/8

Jim
Old 05-12-2017, 01:34 PM
  #9  
the Wasp
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VT
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

well crap, my head just exploded !!

Chad Veich, I hear you, but, I was just using my Zenoah as an example of weight, if I did use it I would have to cut a 2&1/2 inch hole on one side of the Cowl for the Carb, and a much-much larger hole on the other side for the muffler, besides, to do some "preliminary testing" I would have to drill holes in the Engine Wall that I may not even use,,

for something different I wanted to buy the HP 120 Inline Twin 2st, with mufflers it should come in around the same weight as my Zenoah 20, but it will cost $600 with mufflers to get it in the plane, I'm frustrated, I can't even find a set of reliable Rotating Electric Retracts for it under $400

but as they say,,,,, "That's the Hobby"

Jim
Old 05-12-2017, 02:21 PM
  #10  
RBACONS
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Just put the cowl on with no engine and keep adding weights inside the cowl until it balances and then weigh the weights. Won't be exact but will get you a good enough idea as to whether or not the engine and mufflers you are thinking about are too heavy for the plane.

Wing loading does't matter as long as your engine is the right weight or lighter than is needed to achieve balance. Its going to be what its going to be unless your willing to start carving weight out of the back end of the plane.
Old 05-12-2017, 03:52 PM
  #11  
All Day Dan
My Feedback: (5)
 
All Day Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MANHATTAN BEACH, CA
Posts: 4,606
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Sorry Mr. Bacons but wing loading is extremely important along with the CG location. Use ballast to get the CG right with the engine you have. Dan.
Old 05-12-2017, 04:23 PM
  #12  
RBACONS
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Sorry, but no dice. He has a plane, and unless he's willing to modify it, the total engine/muffler/nose weight that is needed to achieve the correct CG is fixed. As long as his engine/muffler combo does not exceed the weight needed to achieve the correct CG, the wing loading is fixed regardless of the engine chosen. Your welcome to worry about the wing loading but its a meaningless exercise (again, unless your willing to modify the existing airframe).
Old 05-14-2017, 07:22 PM
  #13  
radfordc
My Feedback: (14)
 
radfordc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lansing, KS
Posts: 1,598
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Compare your VQ P-40 with my TF P-40... My plane has a 64" span and 697 sq in of area and weighs about 10.5 lbs. It has a Valley View 20cc engine (32 oz total weight) and balances just right. It flys very well.

Your plane with 62" span will have about 660 sq in of area and with the heavy Zenoah engine will weigh much more than 8 lbs. You're main concern won't be wing loading so much as getting the CG correct (will probably need tail weight), although wing loading may be a factor, too. I would look for a lighter engine. Are you confident flying a heavy plane that lands fast? Having too much power is never a concern as long as you know what the throttle stick does.

Horizon Hobby sells E-Flight rotating retracts that work for your plane. I've got them in my Warhawk.
Old 05-14-2017, 07:23 PM
  #14  
radfordc
My Feedback: (14)
 
radfordc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lansing, KS
Posts: 1,598
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Compare your VQ P-40 with my TF P-40... My plane has a 64" span and 697 sq in of area and weighs about 10.5 lbs. It has a Valley View 20cc engine (32 oz total weight) and balances just right. It flys very well.

Your plane with 62" span will have about 660 sq in of area and with the heavy Zenoah engine will weigh much more than 8 lbs. You're main concern won't be wing loading so much as getting the CG correct (will probably need tail weight), although wing loading may be a factor, too. I would look for a lighter engine. Are you confident flying a heavy plane that lands fast? Having too much power is never a concern as long as you know what the throttle stick does.

Horizon Hobby sells E-Flight rotating retracts that work for your plane. I've got them in my Warhawk.
Old 05-14-2017, 07:25 PM
  #15  
radfordc
My Feedback: (14)
 
radfordc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lansing, KS
Posts: 1,598
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

E-Flight 60-120 95-Degree Electric Rotating Retracts. $159

https://www.horizonhobby.com/EFLG520...xpcaAiRW8P8HAQ
Old 05-15-2017, 10:42 AM
  #16  
the Wasp
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VT
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

radfordc, thank you, I have seen the E-Flights and they seen good, I would like to buy a set, but there has been some complaints of them failing straight out of the box..

I wont use my Zenoah, it's just too big for the Cowl,, I pretty much guess I will buying a Saito 125, but I will wait another week or so and think on it.. I'm sure with the Saito I will need to add weight up front, I know I can move the Rx Battery forward, but maybe I can move the Throttle Servo forwarded too

Jim

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.