TopRCModel FW-190
#601

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536

#602

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536



Since the radial is such a low vibration engine I decided that 4 cowl mounts will be plenty
#603

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dubai, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
Posts: 487

Nice work, very neat. Is this the 125cc engine?
It seems to have a very short snout, requiring the engine to be mounted quite far forward. I cant help thinking that a longer prop hub modification would allow the engine to be mounted further back in the cowl and not have the problem of the rockers interfering with the cowl. I have seen the engine 'in situ' in the cowl, with no interference, but that is of course, without the offset taken into consideration.
Also, with the 125 being heavier than the FG90, it shouldnt affect the CG that much if moved back a bit... hmmm, I am going to have to think this through.
Nice to see your progress.
It seems to have a very short snout, requiring the engine to be mounted quite far forward. I cant help thinking that a longer prop hub modification would allow the engine to be mounted further back in the cowl and not have the problem of the rockers interfering with the cowl. I have seen the engine 'in situ' in the cowl, with no interference, but that is of course, without the offset taken into consideration.
Also, with the 125 being heavier than the FG90, it shouldnt affect the CG that much if moved back a bit... hmmm, I am going to have to think this through.
Nice to see your progress.
#604

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536

Nice work, very neat. Is this the 125cc engine?
It seems to have a very short snout, requiring the engine to be mounted quite far forward. I cant help thinking that a longer prop hub modification would allow the engine to be mounted further back in the cowl and not have the problem of the rockers interfering with the cowl. I have seen the engine 'in situ' in the cowl, with no interference, but that is of course, without the offset taken into consideration.
Also, with the 125 being heavier than the FG90, it shouldnt affect the CG that much if moved back a bit... hmmm, I am going to have to think this through.
Nice to see your progress.
It seems to have a very short snout, requiring the engine to be mounted quite far forward. I cant help thinking that a longer prop hub modification would allow the engine to be mounted further back in the cowl and not have the problem of the rockers interfering with the cowl. I have seen the engine 'in situ' in the cowl, with no interference, but that is of course, without the offset taken into consideration.
Also, with the 125 being heavier than the FG90, it shouldnt affect the CG that much if moved back a bit... hmmm, I am going to have to think this through.
Nice to see your progress.
Last edited by n8622t; 10-29-2019 at 05:37 AM.
#605

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dubai, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
Posts: 487

Jimmy, I think I will look into getting a new prop hub machined on there. It would likely need to be a hub with a design similar to a DLE type configuration in order to work, I am not sure if that will be as easy as one would think as it would mean adding a magnet for the timing...need to sit back and do some sort of design.
Thanks for your help.
Thanks for your help.
#606

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536


Cowl mount area is reinforced and ready to drill
#607

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536



Cowl mount area is reinforced and ready to drill
#608

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536

Drill and tap





#609

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536



Now to mount the cooling vents, clean up the rocker reliefs and blister, and baffle the engine
#610

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dubai, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
Posts: 487

Looks good man! Are you going to be putting more cooling vents than the one at the bottom? The openings where the real plane's exhausts are, are pretty large, and them in conjunction with the louvre at the bottom...as well as baffling, might just be enough to get air moving through and removing heat...I would hope it is, as adding more vents is going to start taking away from the 'appearance'.
I am following dilligently as I am searching for ways to get this engine in without to much hacking. By the looks of it, moving the engine back around 1.25" might just negate the need to have the valve areas cut out....its marginal..
Great work, and i am SOOOO keen to see this plane fly with that 'lump' in it.
Andy
I am following dilligently as I am searching for ways to get this engine in without to much hacking. By the looks of it, moving the engine back around 1.25" might just negate the need to have the valve areas cut out....its marginal..
Great work, and i am SOOOO keen to see this plane fly with that 'lump' in it.
Andy
#611

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536




Thanks Andy but I didn’t mention that the Germans were working on a new prototype 190 that never met production due to the end of the war....it had a 5 cyl radial
#612

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536

Decided to add two smaller vents on top of cowl

#613

My Feedback: (6)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, IN,
Posts: 1,416

From what I understand the vents like the ones you use are not very effective since the space is so small between the slats lots of interference drag as the air tries to figure the way out.
Sparky
Sparky
#614

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536

Actually the vents are very affective....the openings are very large and the slats are angled as to create a negative pressure which reduces drag on the front side and easy air flow on the exit side, very affective
#615

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536

That should be close to a 3:1 ratio of venting



#616

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536



Now to brace and hot glue then a thin coat of epoxy on the baffles
#617

My Feedback: (45)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wading River,
NY
Posts: 1,044

So after flying mine all season, I have to say this has turned out to be one of my favorite airplanes. I put probably 60-70 flights on it and really have had zero issues with it. Its a superb flying plane with the DLE-111. I have Sierra main gear and the TOP RC stock tailwheel unit. I never could get the geometry on the pull pull cables correct on the tailwheel, so I ended up just locking it down.
#618

My Feedback: (45)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wading River,
NY
Posts: 1,044

#619

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536

That’s awesome...glad to hear it’s a solid bird
#620

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536



EZ fit
#621

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536


Time for the tail
#622

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536

Here’s the tail wheel pull pull cable geometry:
mount the cable exits 3/8 inch above the forward tail wheel mount and there shouldn’t be any tension change in the cables
mount the cable exits 3/8 inch above the forward tail wheel mount and there shouldn’t be any tension change in the cables
Last edited by n8622t; 11-05-2019 at 06:25 AM.
#623

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536


Thanks for the help Tim
#624

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536



Drill your pull pull cables here and the cable tension remains constant...3/8 inch above the mount plate
#625

My Feedback: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Springdale,
AR
Posts: 3,536




And I thought the cowl was a lot of work