Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2006, 11:05 AM
  #1  
Ken Bryant
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (10)
 
Ken Bryant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Surprise, AZ
Posts: 1,403
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

http://www.horizonhobby.com/Products...ProdID=HAN4050

Looks like they are reintroducing the Big P-51. I like this color scheme much better than the other one.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Zx71116.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	16.3 KB
ID:	543894   Click image for larger version

Name:	Dy80400.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	16.1 KB
ID:	543895  
Old 10-19-2006, 11:14 AM
  #2  
MinnFlyer
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
MinnFlyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Willmar, MN
Posts: 28,519
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Looks NICE!
Old 10-19-2006, 11:35 AM
  #3  
BankYank
My Feedback: (63)
 
BankYank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kootenai, ID
Posts: 1,107
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Look's like they added 3in to the wing and fixed that gap on the top of the flap's,Fixed the BAD retract rail's also.
old
Wing Span: 77 in (1956 mm)
Overall Length: 68 in (1727 mm)
Wing Area: 1039 sq in (67 dm²)
Flying Weight: 13 - 14.5 lb (5.9 - 6.6 kg)
Engine Size: 1.20-1.50 (2-stroke), 1.50-2.00 (4-stroke)
Radio: 6 channels
Servos: 10 (8 standard and 2 retracts)

New
Wing Span: 80 in (2032mm)
Overall Length: 68.25 in with spinner
Wing Area: 1100 sq in (71 sq dm)
Flying Weight: 15.62 lbs
Engine Size: 1.20-2.10 2-stroke; 1.2-2.20 4-stroke; 23-26cc gas
Radio: 6-channel
Servos: 10 Servos, 8 standard high torque (54 oz/in or more), 2 low profile, hi-torque (JRPS791) retract servos

Pat
Old 10-19-2006, 11:40 AM
  #4  
David Eichstedt
My Feedback: (17)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Woo Hoo! I just pre-ordered mine. Let's hope it arrives before Thanksgiving so I'll have time to work on it.

Was going for the P-47, but this one will require less work to get it where I want it. Plan is for Glamorous Glen with an FPE 2.4.

What are you guys going with?
Old 10-19-2006, 11:52 AM
  #5  
rc34074
My Feedback: (5)
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Little Elm, TX
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

they got smart and increased the wingspan to 80 inches. the retracts look like their p47 retracts- no mustang offset struts. can anyone tell if the tail feathers are airfoil shaped? is the rudder sheeted?

its curious- they only rate it to 26cc engines- i'll bet very few put that small a gasser in them. you probably need to plan to reinforce the firewall.

ed
Old 10-19-2006, 12:14 PM
  #6  
David Eichstedt
My Feedback: (17)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Now I'm having second thoughts. Reading the manual, unlike the P-47, it's a one-piece wing. Integrating my FPE 2.4 may present more of a challenge than it would on the P-47. And the pylons are too small to easily add bomb-drop paraphernalia, whereas on the P-47 it's a simple mod.

Aaaack!
Old 10-19-2006, 02:05 PM
  #7  
BankYank
My Feedback: (63)
 
BankYank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kootenai, ID
Posts: 1,107
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

I wonder if the new wing will fit the old fuse? Probably not. I would think the wing saddle was made longer by the 1/4in to fit the new wing.

Can't say about the new one but the old one the rudder is not sheeted and the stab is airfoiled shape.
Pat
Old 10-19-2006, 03:33 PM
  #8  
David Eichstedt
My Feedback: (17)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Instruction manual shows airfoiled tail surfaces, and what looks like an unsheeted rudder. I can see ribs.
Old 10-19-2006, 03:51 PM
  #9  
lownloud
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surf city, CA
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

having bought the P-47, I am impressed with Hangar9 palanes. I honestly think a guy could build the giant P-47 in a long weekend. Really, there's nothing to it. As far as scale looks, well, it looks pretty damn good to me. The quality and scale outline are exactly what you pay for. No more, no less. I like them

The Mustang looks way better than the first go round and if it comes with the retracts that came with the P-47 its a hit.
I like what they are doing.

If they came out with a giant Corsair, I'd buy it.
Big planes are a pain to get to the field but are so much easier to work on and fly nicer (or at least seems that way to me).
Old 10-19-2006, 10:20 PM
  #10  
LDM
My Feedback: (15)
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Denver, PA
Posts: 9,326
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

I have to handed to them , 1)they constantly reinvent themselves and try to better there products
2)they have done more to get newbees includeing me into warbirds because there 60/90 size birds fly like sport planes
3)they are reasonable in cost and friendly customer servace
Overall a great company , I hope they introduce a larger P40 and Corsair
Old 10-20-2006, 07:27 AM
  #11  
Oryx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pretoria, SOUTH AFRICA
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Why is the increase in wingspan out of proportion with the increase in length? Were the proportions of the original one off? I wasn't really contemplating purchasing one, but the fact that the wing is scaled up with a larger percentage as the fuselage just struck me as a bit strange.
Old 10-20-2006, 07:41 AM
  #12  
Build-n-flyer-RCU
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Build-n-flyer-RCU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Evans, GA
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Well its about time! Looking through the pics it looks like the same airplane as the discontinued model but stretched a bit and (hopefully) with all the problems resolved. My orginal 150 P-51 is/was an outstanding flyer once I got all the quirks are worked out- this new one should be really nice.

Walt
Old 10-20-2006, 09:35 AM
  #13  
David Eichstedt
My Feedback: (17)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Having now looked long and hard at the manual and compared the dimensions of the FA-220 (shown in the manual) to my FPE 2.4, I've decided to forego the Mustang and go back to my plan to do a P-47.

The Mustang still looks like a great kit, and I'm sure it will be popular, but the Jug just hold more appeal for me right now. My engine will fit better, and I really prefer two-piece wings for models this big.
Old 10-20-2006, 10:01 AM
  #14  
SpitfireMKI
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
SpitfireMKI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: RAF Turnhouse 603 Squadron, MD
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Why do they bother re-releasing the same plane, especially in a world crowded with Mustangs ? How about something new ?
Old 10-20-2006, 12:05 PM
  #15  
P-51B
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
P-51B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: An Iceburg in, ANTARCTICA
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

I think I would have rather seen an FW-190A instead of another mustang from them.
Old 10-20-2006, 12:12 PM
  #16  
SpitfireMKI
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
SpitfireMKI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: RAF Turnhouse 603 Squadron, MD
Posts: 1,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

[sm=thumbs_up.gif]
Old 10-20-2006, 12:15 PM
  #17  
BankYank
My Feedback: (63)
 
BankYank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kootenai, ID
Posts: 1,107
Received 17 Likes on 12 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

I would guess they originally discontinued it because of the odd wing span and WEAK landing gear rail's.
I have the original. The wingspan did not bother me at all. After fixing the retracts with new rail's and Robart gear,making it a standoff "B" I can tell ya,,,, this IS the best flying mustang your ever gonna fly,It is the easiest to land i have ever seen. . For being sport scale it's size and presence in the air will draw a crowd to watch[8D]. Manufactures like mustangs,,They will always be popular as everyone has to have one at sometime or other. True they need to release a different big one,,,Myself im waiting for a corsair as well as a buddy i fly with. Until then though this one goes to the field every time i go now
Pat
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Nl29852.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	134.7 KB
ID:	544530   Click image for larger version

Name:	Hd94431.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	140.8 KB
ID:	544531  
Old 10-20-2006, 02:40 PM
  #18  
toto_sal
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: La Libertad, EL SALVADOR
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Just saw the thread and am very excited to see this bird once again in action. I was wondering what you guys recommend with respect to the possible engine size for this aircraft. I have a Zen 26 in the garage waiting for a plane and was wondering what your comments or suggestions might be to this???

Would really appreciate the help!!!
Old 10-20-2006, 03:52 PM
  #19  
P-51B
Senior Member
My Feedback: (5)
 
P-51B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: An Iceburg in, ANTARCTICA
Posts: 6,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Heck, if it had to be another mustang, they could have at least made it the good looking one...the P-51B or P-51C!!!![sm=wink_smile.gif]
Old 10-20-2006, 07:45 PM
  #20  
AIRPLANENUTS
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Old 10-21-2006, 02:13 PM
  #21  
mirwin
My Feedback: (1)
 
mirwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50


ORIGINAL: lownloud ". . . . . . If they came out with a giant Corsair, I'd buy it. . . . .
Yeah, man. I'm itching for a 80" Corsair! Comeon, Horizon, listen up!!!


Mike
Old 10-21-2006, 05:13 PM
  #22  
8178
My Feedback: (17)
 
8178's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,348
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

Interesting how their website proudly shows the wrong main gear retract units and they also kludged them onto the prototype backwards. Don’t they do any quality assurance checking?
Old 10-21-2006, 08:25 PM
  #23  
David Eichstedt
My Feedback: (17)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Greenwood, IN
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

8178,

What in the world are you talking about?
Old 10-21-2006, 09:36 PM
  #24  
Build-n-flyer-RCU
Senior Member
My Feedback: (4)
 
Build-n-flyer-RCU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Evans, GA
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50

The only thing that I could find suspect is the recommended elevator rates. Unless they made some other changes to compensate they still have the insanely high 5/8" low and 3/4" high rates listed on the H9 website.

Walt
Old 10-22-2006, 08:00 AM
  #25  
8178
My Feedback: (17)
 
8178's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,348
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE: NEW (IMPROVED?) Hanger 9 P-51 1.50


ORIGINAL: Flanker

8178,

What in the world are you talking about?
You are kidding, right! The landing gear is NOT even close to P51 landing gear. The strut completely wrong and on backwards. Must be something they kludged up for the prototype because I cant imagine them selling them like that.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Ki19463.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	24.2 KB
ID:	545672   Click image for larger version

Name:	Gb90178.jpg
Views:	14
Size:	32.5 KB
ID:	545673  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.