RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Reply

Old 03-24-2014, 02:46 PM
  #9551  
Redback
Senior Member
 
Redback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: GraftonNew South Wales, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,289
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Would make a great movie!

Terry
Redback is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 05:09 AM
  #9552  
brn2fly
My Feedback: (190)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hobe Sound, FL
Posts: 100
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Beechcraft Stagerwing
brn2fly is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 05:17 AM
  #9553  
adavis
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 455
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by Redback View Post
(1) The military aircraft i am looking for had its origins in an executive aircraft
Bristol Blenheim?

Best Regards,
=Adrian=
adavis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 06:59 AM
  #9554  
brn2fly
My Feedback: (190)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hobe Sound, FL
Posts: 100
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Beechcraft King Air
brn2fly is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 12:09 PM
  #9555  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 624
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Focke-Wulf Fw 200 Condor?

Or the
[h=1]Cessna 526 CitationJet?[/h]

Last edited by JohnnyS; 03-25-2014 at 12:20 PM.
JohnnyS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2014, 12:42 PM
  #9556  
Redback
Senior Member
 
Redback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: GraftonNew South Wales, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,289
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Sorry to be slow back on this, I've been sleeping!!!!

Adrian is correct, the Bristol Blenheim light bomber.

Based on an aircraft built for media magnate Lord Rorthermere which turned out to be significantly faster than any RAF fighter around at the time.

You are up sir!!!

Terry
Redback is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2014, 03:46 AM
  #9557  
adavis
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 455
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Next warbird:-

1) Two seat.

2) Biplane.

3) Designed for an environment in which it was never used.

Best Regards,
=Adrian=
adavis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2014, 03:37 PM
  #9558  
RCKen
RCU Forum Manager/Admin
My Feedback: (9)
 
RCKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lawton, OK
Posts: 26,944
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by adavis View Post
Next warbird:-

1) Two seat.

2) Biplane.

3) Designed for an environment in which it was never used.

Best Regards,
=Adrian=
Antonov An-2??



Ken
RCKen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2014, 01:35 AM
  #9559  
adavis
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 455
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Next question:-

1) Two seat.

2) Biplane.

3) Designed for an environment in which it was never used.

4) Shared a particular ability with another more well known aircraft produced by the same company.

Best Regards,
=Adrian=
adavis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2014, 09:46 AM
  #9560  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 624
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

This is not really fair, as Ernie P. already answered it: The Fiesler Fi 167.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fieseler_Fi_167

If Ernie wants, he can go ahead and take this and run with the next question.
JohnnyS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2014, 11:43 AM
  #9561  
Ernie P.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 4,668
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyS View Post
This is not really fair, as Ernie P. already answered it: The Fiesler Fi 167.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fieseler_Fi_167

If Ernie wants, he can go ahead and take this and run with the next question.

JohnnyS; Let's wait until Adrian confirms that's the right answer. I know the Fieseler seems to meet all the requirements; but there are often multiple correct answers. If it is, you go ahead. Besides, I'm trying to lay back a bit. I don't want folks to get tired of my questions. Thanks; Ernie P.
Ernie P. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2014, 12:50 AM
  #9562  
adavis
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 455
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyS View Post
This is not really fair, as Ernie P. already answered it: The Fiesler Fi 167.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fieseler_Fi_167

If Ernie wants, he can go ahead and take this and run with the next question.

Fiesler Fi 167 is correct - Sorry if this was a duplicate!!

Best Regards,
=Adrian=
adavis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2014, 01:21 AM
  #9563  
Ernie P.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 4,668
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by adavis View Post
Fiesler Fi 167 is correct - Sorry if this was a duplicate!!

Best Regards,
=Adrian=

Don't sweat the small stuff, Adrian; I was going to sit back and see if any one caught it. JohnnyS did, so I'll let him run with the next question. But, if he doesn't post anything by this evening, I'll post the next question. Thanks; Ernie P.
Ernie P. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2014, 05:16 AM
  #9564  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 624
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Thanks, Ernie P!

OK, let's see if I can come up with something interesting.

1. It was a test aircraft. Only one was built, but it was flown a LOT by many interesting people.

2. The next aircraft in the series was much faster. MUCH faster!

3. Developed using parts from different Beech aircraft models.

4. Twin engined.
JohnnyS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2014, 09:26 PM
  #9565  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 624
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

1. It was a test aircraft. Only one was built, but it was flown a LOT by many interesting people.

2. The next aircraft in the series was much faster. MUCH faster!

3. Developed using parts from different Beech aircraft models.

4. Twin engined.

5. Although jet powered, top speed was only 180 mph.
JohnnyS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2014, 10:49 AM
  #9566  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 624
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

1. It was a test aircraft. Only one was built, but it was flown a LOT by many interesting people.

2. The next aircraft in the series was much faster. MUCH faster!

3. Developed using parts from different Beech aircraft models.

4. Twin engined.

5. Although jet powered, top speed was only 180 mph.

6. At one point, a digital fly-by-wire control system was installed on the aircraft and it's designation was changed from (name)A to (name)B.
JohnnyS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 10:11 AM
  #9567  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 624
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

No guesses yet? Sad.

1. It was a test aircraft. Only one was built, but it was flown a LOT by many interesting people.

2. The next aircraft in the series was much faster. MUCH faster!

3. Developed using parts from different Beech aircraft models.

4. Twin engined.

5. Although jet powered, top speed was only 180 mph.

6. At one point, a digital fly-by-wire control system was installed on the aircraft and it's designation was changed from (name)A to (name)B.

7. First flight in 1957, retired in 1981.

8. Go back and re-read clue #2: The next aircraft in the series still holds records for speed.
JohnnyS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 05:12 PM
  #9568  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Bell X-14?
zippome is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 06:55 PM
  #9569  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 624
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Yes, Yes, YES!!!

That's IT.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_X-14



Sir, you ROCK, sir. Please go ahead with the next question!
JohnnyS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2014, 09:02 PM
  #9570  
Redback
Senior Member
 
Redback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: GraftonNew South Wales, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,289
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Hi Zip

Now you gotta figure out a question! That'll teach you to be a smarty pants

Terry
Redback is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 06:35 AM
  #9571  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 624
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

JohnnyS is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 02:31 PM
  #9572  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Ok, Lets see what obscure thing I can find that you guys can answer in one question!
Thanks ,
Zip!
zippome is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 06:46 AM
  #9573  
Ernie P.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 4,668
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Originally Posted by zippome View Post
Ok, Lets see what obscure thing I can find that you guys can answer in one question!
Thanks ,
Zip!
Zip; please post your question, Sir. Otherwise, we will have to move on. Thanks; Ernie P.
Ernie P. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 02:09 PM
  #9574  
Ernie P.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 4,668
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Zip;

Last chance, Sir. Thanks; Ernie P.

Originally Posted by Ernie P. View Post
Zip; please post your question, Sir. Otherwise, we will have to move on. Thanks; Ernie P.
Ernie P. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 03:09 PM
  #9575  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Gallery
My Gallery
Models
My Models
Ratings
My Feedback
Default

Sorry Ernie! I meant to post last night but I ended up helping a buddy move. His divorce reminds me of the old joke. Q." Why is divorce so expensive?" A. "Because its worth it!"
zippome is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy