Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Old 12-20-2014, 04:00 PM
  #10551  
pilotal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OK gang - maybe I'll get past the first round on this warbird
1 - This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2- 4 engine
Old 12-21-2014, 08:18 AM
  #10552  
perttime
 
perttime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tampere, FINLAND
Posts: 1,726
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Avro Shackleton?
Old 12-21-2014, 09:33 AM
  #10553  
pilotal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not the Shackleton
1 - This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed by this nation.
2- 4 engine
3 - For it’s time and type very fast
4 - Development of a new technology doomed it.
Old 12-21-2014, 09:43 AM
  #10554  
elmshoot
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, IN,
Posts: 1,704
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Babazon?
Old 12-21-2014, 02:22 PM
  #10555  
pilotal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not the Babazon either

1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neither crash was caused by a design failure
Old 12-22-2014, 04:12 AM
  #10556  
pilotal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neither crash was caused by a design failure
6 Strongly built Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
Old 12-22-2014, 06:27 PM
  #10557  
pilotal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
Old 12-23-2014, 06:18 AM
  #10558  
pilotal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.
Old 12-23-2014, 07:36 AM
  #10559  
perttime
 
perttime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tampere, FINLAND
Posts: 1,726
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Handley Page Victor?
Old 12-23-2014, 08:44 AM
  #10560  
Sekhet
My Feedback: (1)
 
Sekhet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Martinsville, WV
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmm...
With the clues given, this is sounding like the North American Aviation XB-70 Valkyrie.
Old 12-23-2014, 09:48 AM
  #10561  
pilotal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Neither the Victor nor the Valkyrie.


1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.

You have to think a little outside the box on this one. Thistype doesn’t show up much on this site.

13 The prototype and pre-production aircraft had verypleasant and docile handling characteristics so it was very surprising that thefirst production aircraft had developed some very nasty handling traits.
14 By the time it was ready to be introduced operationally thenew technology mentioned in 4 had surpassed it and the program was cancelled.
Old 12-23-2014, 11:51 AM
  #10562  
pilotal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Neither the Victor nor the Valkyrie.


1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.

You have to think a little outside the box on this one. Thistype doesn’t show up much on this site.

13 The prototype and pre-production aircraft had verypleasant and docile handling characteristics so it was very surprising that thefirst production aircraft had developed some very nasty handling traits.
14 By the time it was ready to be introduced operationally thenew technology mentioned in 4 had surpassed it and the program was cancelled.
Old 12-23-2014, 01:39 PM
  #10563  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pilotal
Neither the Victor nor the Valkyrie.


1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.

You have to think a little outside the box on this one. Thistype doesn’t show up much on this site.

13 The prototype and pre-production aircraft had verypleasant and docile handling characteristics so it was very surprising that thefirst production aircraft had developed some very nasty handling traits.
14 By the time it was ready to be introduced operationally thenew technology mentioned in 4 had surpassed it and the program was cancelled.

Pilotal; you have come up with a great question. I don't want to take the lead right now, because I'm hoping to go hunting next week, but I'm really getting tempted. Again, a great question and a .... Well, I don't want to give anything away. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 12-23-2014, 02:09 PM
  #10564  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by pilotal
Neither the Victor nor the Valkyrie.


1 This was the last in a long line of it’s type developed bythis nation.
2 4 engine
3 For it’s time and type very fast
4 Development of a new technology doomed it.
5 The first 2 prototypes crashed killing one crew. Neithercrash was caused by a design failure.
6 Some of the skin areas were almost 1” thick Aluminum alloy
7 Very fast - low altitude dash speed of .89 Mach
8 Initially engineswere afterburning turbojets
9 prototypes had to have the engines moved to avoidscorching the fuselage.
10 It was the last aircraft designed by this majormanufacturer
11 the first 2 prototypes had significant anhedral in thewing. This was eliminated in the preproduction aircraft.
12 Initial purposewas as a strategic nuclear bomber.

You have to think a little outside the box on this one. Thistype doesn’t show up much on this site.

13 The prototype and pre-production aircraft had verypleasant and docile handling characteristics so it was very surprising that thefirst production aircraft had developed some very nasty handling traits.
14 By the time it was ready to be introduced operationally thenew technology mentioned in 4 had surpassed it and the program was cancelled.
[h=1]Northrop YB-49[/h][h=1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_YB-49[/h][h=1]the Northrop YB-35 the Prop Version[/h][h=1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_YB-35[/h]
Old 12-23-2014, 02:50 PM
  #10565  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How about the Martin P6m SeaMaster?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:P6M_SeaMaster.jpg
Old 12-23-2014, 04:10 PM
  #10566  
pilotal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You got it ZIPPOME !!! The Seamaster was a great closer to a huge and largely unheralded part of Naval Aviation history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_P6M_SeaMaster
Old 12-23-2014, 04:10 PM
  #10567  
pilotal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You got it ZIPPOME !!! The Seamaster was a great closer to a huge and largely unheralded part of Naval Aviation history. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_P6M_SeaMaster
Old 12-24-2014, 10:41 AM
  #10568  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Merry Christmas to all and to all a good night. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 12-24-2014, 02:12 PM
  #10569  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have a Very Merry Christmas Guys and Gals!
I'll have my question up posthaste!
Old 12-25-2014, 08:05 AM
  #10570  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Merry Christmas Everyone!

Ok, I thought i'd post a question before I nod off in a nice Christmas Nap!

1. Twin Engines.
2. Monoplane.
3. The plane was first designed to do one job, but was purposed to do other tasks.
4. It was designed to meet a specification to do one thing differently than it's peers.
5. That specification was later dropped, but not because it didn't work.

Ok, That's it for now!

Thanks!
Zip
5.
Old 12-27-2014, 06:52 PM
  #10571  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1. Twin Engines.
2. Monoplane.
3. The plane was first designed to do one job, but was purposed to do other tasks.
4. It was designed to meet a specification to do one thing differently than it's peers.
5. That specification was later dropped, but not because it didn't work.
6. Suffered from a high loss rate, but not due to any fault of the aircraft.
7. Although it was designed for one purpose, it was put into production to serve another. But not until some changes were made.
Ok, That's it for now!

Thanks!
Zip
Old 12-28-2014, 08:25 AM
  #10572  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1. Twin Engines.
2. Monoplane.
3. The plane was first designed to do one job, but was purposed to do other tasks.
4. It was designed to meet a specification to do one thing differently than it's peers.
5. That specification was later dropped, but not because it didn't work.
6. Suffered from a high loss rate, but not due to any fault of the aircraft.
7. Although it was designed for one purpose, it was put into production to serve another. But not until some changes were made.
8. This aircraft went through many design changes during it's development.
9. Some include :
a) Straight wing to swept.
b) V tail to conventional.
c) Horizontal Stabilizer going from having dihedral to anhedral.
d) Also the wingtips needed some work, and wing fences had to be added.

Ok, That's it for now!

Thanks!
Zip
Old 12-29-2014, 05:30 PM
  #10573  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1. Twin Engines.
2. Monoplane.
3. The plane was first designed to do one job, but was purposed to do other tasks.
4. It was designed to meet a specification to do one thing differently than it's peers.
5. That specification was later dropped, but not because it didn't work.
6. Suffered from a high loss rate, but not due to any fault of the aircraft.
7. Although it was designed for one purpose, it was put into production to serve another. But not until some changes were made.
8. This aircraft went through many design changes during it's development.
9. Some include :
a) Straight wing to swept.
b) V tail to conventional.
c) Horizontal Stabilizer going from having dihedral to anhedral.
d) Also the wingtips needed some work, and wing fences had to be added.
10. When the replacement aircraft was put into service, this plane was kept in service to be used in a support role to overcome a deficiency in the new aircraft.
11. It shares it's name with at least one other military aircraft. (of an older vintage)

Ok, That's it for now!

Thanks!
Zip
Old 12-30-2014, 08:35 AM
  #10574  
perttime
 
perttime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tampere, FINLAND
Posts: 1,726
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The thing about V tail has me stumped ... OK: maybe some other things too.
Old 12-30-2014, 09:49 AM
  #10575  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

F-4 Phantom?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.