Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-17-2015, 10:35 AM
  #11426  
elmshoot
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, IN,
Posts: 1,705
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Hound dog had the same idea as me, I am stumped.
Sparky
Old 06-17-2015, 12:19 PM
  #11427  
uncljoe
My Feedback: (8)
 
uncljoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,111
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

1.This aircraft first flew durning the early summer of 1941
2. Started out with two engines ended up with four.
3. This aircraft's finest hour was in the winter of 1943
4. Performance of the twin and four engine aircraft was very similar
5.All but One of the aircraft were destroyed by emeny action ** another source says two
survived the war..
6.The surviving aircraft was pressed into service repatriating prisoners of war from both sides immediately after the war
7.This aircraft must have make a tire (tyre) supplier very happy .
8.This aircraft had a rear loading ramp offered sufficient clearance to permit direct loading / unloading onto trucks
9. This aircraft had 25(twenty five) tires(tyres)

Old 06-17-2015, 12:33 PM
  #11428  
uncljoe
My Feedback: (8)
 
uncljoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,111
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Bonus CLUE .... Some called it a military" Millipede"
Old 06-17-2015, 12:39 PM
  #11429  
Sal C.
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Holbrook, New York NY
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Arado AR-232
Old 06-17-2015, 12:54 PM
  #11430  
uncljoe
My Feedback: (8)
 
uncljoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,111
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Sal, you are the winner. The next question is yours



Arado Ar 232

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


[TABLE="class: infobox, width: 315"]
[TR]
[TH="colspan: 2, align: center"]Ar 232[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2, align: center"][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 2, align: center"]Arado Ar 232 B-0[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Role[/TH]
[TD]Transport[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Manufacturer[/TH]
[TD]Arado Flugzeugwerke[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]First flight[/TH]
[TD]June 1941[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Introduction[/TH]
[TD]1943[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Retired[/TH]
[TD]1945[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Primary user[/TH]
[TD]Luftwaffe[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH]Number built[/TH]
[TD]~20[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
The Arado Ar 232 Tausendfόίler (German: "Millipede"), sometimes also called Tatzelwurm, was one of the first truly modern cargo aircraft,[SUP][citation needed][/SUP] designed and built in small numbers by the German firm Arado Flugzeugwerke during World War II. The design introduced, or brought together, almost all of the features now considered to be "standard" in modern cargo transport aircraft designs, including a box-like fuselage slung beneath a high wing; a rear loading ramp (that had first appeared on the December 1939-flown Junkers Ju 90 V5 fifth prototype four-engined transport via its Trapoklappe); a high tail for easy access to the hold; and various features for operating from rough fields. Although the Luftwaffe was interested in replacing or supplementing its fleet of outdated Junkers Ju 52/3m transports, it had an abundance of types in production at the time and did not purchase large numbers of the Ar 232.
Contents

[hide]

Design[edit]

The Ar 232 design resulted from a tender offered by the Reichsluftfahrtministerium (German Air Ministry, RLM) in late 1939 for a replacement for the Ju 52/3m transport. Both Arado and Henschel were asked for rear-loading designs powered by two 1,193 kW (1,600 hp) BMW 801A/B radial engines, which was just entering prototype production and not currently used on any front-line designs. The Arado design beat out Henschel's after an examination of the plans, and an order for three prototypes was placed in 1940.
Wilhelm van Nes led the design of the Ar 232. He began at the cargo area, with a bay directly behind the "stepless cockpit" that was 6.6 m (21 ft 7Ύ in) long, 2.3 m (7 ft 6½ in) wide and 2.0 m (6 ft 6Ύ in) high. Typical designs of the era would use a side-mounted door for access, but the Ar 232 used hydraulically powered clamshell-doors on the rear of the bay with a ramp to allow cargo to be rolled into the hold. The tail control surfaces were mounted on the end of a long boom to keep the area behind the doors clear so trucks could drive right up to the ramp, much like the 1944-era American Fairchild C-82 Packet of a differing twin boom fuselage configuration. The high-set tail on its "pod-and-boom" configuration fuselage allowed the Ar 232 to be loaded and unloaded faster than other designs.
For short-field performance, the Ar 232 incorporated Arado's own "travelling flap" design for the entire rear surface of the wing. Even loaded to 16,000 kg (35,270 lb), it could take-off in 200 m (656 ft). This distance could be further reduced by using rocket assist (RATO) for take-off, and either parachutes or reverse RATO for landing.
The most noticeable feature of the Ar 232 was the landing gear. Normal operations from prepared runways used a tricycle gear, but the struts could "break", or kneel, after landing to place the fuselage closer to the ground and thereby reduce the ramp angle. An additional set of ten or eleven smaller, non-retractable twinned wheels per side supported the aircraft once the main landing gear's lever-action lower oleo-strut suspended arm - carrying the main gear's wheel/tire unit - was "broken", or could be used for additional support when landing on soft or rough airfields. The aircraft was intended to be capable of taxiing at low speeds on its row of small wheels, thus being able to negotiate small obstacles such as ditches up to 1.5 m (5 ft) in width. The appearance of the row of small wheels led to the nickname "millipede". In flight, the main legs fully retracted into the engine nacelles, while the fixed support wheels remained exposed and the nose wheel only semi-retracted.
Normally operated by a crew of four, the pilot was the only member without two roles. The navigator operated a 13 mm (.51 in) MG 131 machine gun in the nose, the radio operator a 20 mm MG 151 cannon in a rotating turret on the roof, and the loadmaster a 13 mm (.51 in) MG 131 machine gun firing rearward from the extreme rear of the cargo bay above the cargo doors.
Development[edit]

Even before the prototypes were complete in 1941, the Focke-Wulf Fw 190 project had been earmarked to use the BMW 801A/B, and was proving to be a capable design. Production of the BMW 801 was insufficient to supply this new demand, and the Ar 232 was forced to use another engine. Eventually, the BMW Bramo 323 from the Junkers Ju 352 was selected instead, as it was already in production and could meet requirements if the Ar 232 really did replace the Ju 52/3m in service. The prototypes were far enough along that switching engines would have seriously delayed the program, so the first two were to be completed as the Ar 232A, and the third and a newly ordered fourth as the Ar 232B. The third and fourth prototypes (and all production aircraft) used four engines (in place of the two specified in the RLM specification) in order to provide the desired performance.

An Ar 232A-0 in 1945

The first two prototypes, bearing the Stammkennzeichen alphabetic codes GH+GN and VD+YA respectively, started trials in early 1941. The first flight resulted in the collapse of the nose gear, but the millipede wheels saved the aircraft from damage. A further ten pre-production machines were built, and were used operationally as the Ar 232A-0 while awaiting production versions. In general, the Ar 232 completely outperformed the Ju 52/3m. It carried roughly double the load over longer distances, operated from shorter runways and rougher fields if need be, and cruised about 70 km/h (44 mph) faster.
The Ar 232B program ran at the same time. With four 895 kW (1,200 hp) Bramo 323s, power increased from 2,386 kW (3,200 hp) to 3,580 kW (4,800 hp), solving the A model's problem of having little excess power in case of engine failure. This change also required the wing to be extended slightly, the span increasing just over 3 m (9 ft 10 in) in total. The extra weight of the engines also moved the center of gravity forward, which was offset by extending the cargo area rearward another meter.
Two four-engined prototypes were ordered, the V3 and V4, and V3 first flew in May 1942. A further 10 were then ordered as the Ar 232B-0, and were used widely in an operational role. However, this was the only order for the design, as the Luftwaffe gave transport aircraft production a very low priority. Many of those produced were used by Arado to transport aircraft parts between its factories, and did not see front-line service.
Plans were also made to replace the outer wing sections and control surfaces with wooden versions to conserve aluminium. Originally to be known as the Ar 232C, the design dragged on and was later renamed the Ar 432. Plans were finally put into place to start production in October 1945, but the war ended without even a prototype being produced. Two even larger planned versions, the Ar 532 and the Ar 632, would have almost doubled the wingspan to 60 m (196 ft 10 in) and added another two engines.
Two of the B-0s were captured by British forces at the end of the war. After test flights by Eric "Winkle" Brown, who gave the design excellent marks, they were used by the Royal Air Force on flights between England and Germany after the war.



Last edited by uncljoe; 06-17-2015 at 06:04 PM.
Old 06-18-2015, 07:19 AM
  #11431  
uncljoe
My Feedback: (8)
 
uncljoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,111
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

SAL C you have the honor of asking the question
Old 06-18-2015, 07:32 AM
  #11432  
Sal C.
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Holbrook, New York NY
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh, sorry Joe..... Here it is:

This little fighter was ahead of it's time and thought to be a Boeing when seen first seen in combat.
Old 06-18-2015, 09:47 AM
  #11433  
cublover
My Feedback: (47)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sparks, NV
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Stuka Jon N
What member from a famous family was killed arming a radio controled B-17 during WWII
Didn't know they had a RC B-17 in WWII, much less arm it!!.. hahahaa
Old 06-18-2015, 10:56 AM
  #11434  
rgburrill
 
rgburrill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dallas, Tx CT
Posts: 2,865
Received 76 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cublover
Didn't know they had a RC B-17 in WWII, much less arm it!!.. hahahaa
It was our version of Kamikaze. A pilot had to fly it close to the destination then bailing out just before it was flown into the ground. Unfortunately it had a habit of blowing up before the pilot got out. Joe Kennedy was a casualty.

As a side note, if Joe had of survived and gone on his daddy's planned political route maybe Lyndon Johnson's Great Society would never have come about. No entitlement generation. Something to think about.
Old 06-18-2015, 11:01 AM
  #11435  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Stuka Jon N
What member from a famous family was killed arming a radio controled B-17 during WWII


Originally Posted by cublover
Didn't know they had a RC B-17 in WWII, much less arm it!!.. hahahaa
[h=1]The Secret Drone Mission that Killed Joseph Kennedy Jr.[/h]
http://io9.com/5985733/the-secret-dr...eph-kennedy-jr

It's Joe Kennedy Jr.. but it wasn't a RC B-17 but a BQ-8 B-24 Drone

On August 12, 1944, Kennedy and Lieutenant Wilford John Willy took off in a converted B-24 Liberator (the drone versions were designated BQ-8) from Royal Air Force Station Fersfield, near Norwich. Their target was a massive underground military complex called the Fortress of Mimoyecques that had the potential to launch devastating attacks directly at London. Several minutes short of the planned bail out, an electrical fault in the Liberator caused the Torpex to detonate. In a thunderous instant, the plane and both men flying it simply ceased to exist.
Old 06-18-2015, 11:37 AM
  #11436  
stevegauth30
 
stevegauth30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Bristol, CT
Posts: 4,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow. never knew of that. Very interesting
Old 06-18-2015, 12:21 PM
  #11437  
tunakuts3d
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: streamwood, IL
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what does this all have to do with the question posted by Sal C. ?
Old 06-18-2015, 02:00 PM
  #11438  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tunakuts3d
what does this all have to do with the question posted by Sal C. ?

NOPE it's a question Originally Posted by Stuka Jon N. Why? Does it matter?
Old 06-18-2015, 02:41 PM
  #11439  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

All;

One question at a time, please. The rules are: The person who answers the current question, gets to ask the next question. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 06-18-2015, 03:22 PM
  #11440  
Top_Gunn
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Granger, IN
Posts: 2,344
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The question about Joseph Kennedy. Jr.'s B-24 (which is what it was) was posted in 2010. Somebody must have gone to page 1, rather than this one, and assumed it was the current question. Easy mistake to make if you haven't been here before.
Old 06-18-2015, 04:07 PM
  #11441  
uncljoe
My Feedback: (8)
 
uncljoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,111
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

SWAG.... Mitsubishi A6M Zero
Old 06-18-2015, 04:58 PM
  #11442  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Ernie P.
All;

One question at a time, please. The rules are: The person who answers the current question, gets to ask the next question. Thanks; Ernie P.
Something is amiss with the way RCU jumps to the thread mentioned in the email... most of the time I have to go to the LAST command to get to what was in the email go figure. It also takes a long long time. Any others have that problem?
Old 06-18-2015, 05:38 PM
  #11443  
uncljoe
My Feedback: (8)
 
uncljoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,111
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

No problem here in the desert, My guess, most likely it your internet......
Old 06-18-2015, 05:48 PM
  #11444  
HoundDog
My Feedback: (49)
 
HoundDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Apache Junction AZ. WI 0WI8
Posts: 4,501
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by uncljoe
No problem here in the desert, My guess, most likely it your internet......
It's only slow when Trying to access any forum on RCU. Checking the forsale it runs normal.
Old 06-18-2015, 05:51 PM
  #11445  
tunakuts3d
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: streamwood, IL
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have noticed that also , when I try to open the thread from my e mail notification it would go to the 1st page. Now I don't bother and just delete the e mail and go to RCU Warbird page from my favorites bar.
Old 06-18-2015, 05:59 PM
  #11446  
pilotal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Polikarpov I-16 ? Has a passing resemblance to the P-26 peashooter.
Old 06-19-2015, 05:18 AM
  #11447  
Sal C.
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Holbrook, New York NY
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pilotal is the winner

The Polikarpov I-16 was the world's first monoplane fighter with retractable landing gear. Designed in 1933, It fought in the Spanish Civil war, where some thought it was American made. Noone could beleive that Russia could design and build such an advanced fighter for its time. It also fought for the Chinese in 1937 and was Russia's most numerous fighter at the start of operation Barbarosa, Germany's invasion of Russia.

Pilotal you're up!!
Old 06-19-2015, 08:43 AM
  #11448  
pilotal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: North Eastham, MA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OK Gang get your thimkin caps on---

1 - This warbird started as a glider design.
Old 06-19-2015, 09:30 AM
  #11449  
Sal C.
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Holbrook, New York NY
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ME-163 Komet... Designed by Alexander Lippisch.

Only operational rocket powered interceptor.

Sal
Old 06-19-2015, 10:49 AM
  #11450  
JohnnyS
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
Posts: 810
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Or the Me323 Gigant.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.