Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Old 05-31-2016, 07:34 PM
  #13101  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyS
AANNDD we have a WINNER!

Well done sir! I was trying to lead you towards a rotary wing answer to draw out the quiz, but YOU saw through it. Well done and please go ahead with your quiz!
JohnnyS; thanks for the kind words. However, trying to mislead me is a waste of time and effort. My brain doesn't work quickly enough to be misdirected. I have a question ready, but want to think about how to direct the clues. Otherwise, it will be a very short session. I'll post my first clue in the morning. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 06-01-2016, 01:43 AM
  #13102  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

This early warbird made quite a name for itself, although it has been largely forgotten. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What early warbird do I describe?

Clues:
1.This aircraft was considered to be quite fast in its day.
2.It was also considered to be quite dangerous by its opponents.

Last edited by Ernie P.; 06-01-2016 at 01:46 AM.
Old 06-01-2016, 02:20 AM
  #13103  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,524
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

You do realize those three clues leave a lot of room for interpretation, don't you?
Old 06-01-2016, 10:48 AM
  #13104  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hydro Junkie
You do realize those three clues leave a lot of room for interpretation, don't you?
Actually, yes; but, maybe this afternoon clue will narrow things down a bit. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What early warbird do I describe?

Clues:
1.This aircraft was considered to be quite fast in its day.
2.It was also considered to be quite dangerous by its opponents.
3.This aircraft was armed with a machine gun; which was pretty unusual at the time,and about all that was required to be considered very dangerous.

Last edited by Ernie P.; 06-01-2016 at 10:50 AM. Reason: adding spaces that were deleted.
Old 06-01-2016, 01:26 PM
  #13105  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Evening clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What early warbird do I describe?

Clues:
1.This aircraft was considered to be quite fast in its day.
2.It was also considered to be quite dangerous by its opponents.
3.This aircraft was armed with a machine gun; which was pretty unusual at the time,and about all that was required to be considered very dangerous.
4.The observer sat in the front; the pilot to his rear.

Last edited by Ernie P.; 06-01-2016 at 01:31 PM.
Old 06-02-2016, 01:45 AM
  #13106  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Morning clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What early warbird do I describe?

Clues:
1.This aircraft was considered to be quite fast in its day.
2.It was also considered to be quite dangerous by its opponents.
3.This aircraft was armed with a machine gun; which was pretty unusual at the time,and about all that was required to be considered very dangerous.
4.The observer sat in the front; the pilot to his rear.
5.It was a pusher aircraft; which left the observer/gunner free to utilize the still rare, and still more dangerous, machine gun in an offensive role.

Last edited by Ernie P.; 06-02-2016 at 01:55 AM.
Old 06-02-2016, 10:19 AM
  #13107  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Afternoon clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What early warbird do I describe?

Clues:
1.Thisaircraft was considered to be quite fast in its day.
2.Itwas also considered to be quite dangerous by its opponents.
3.Thisaircraft was armed with a machine gun; which was pretty unusual at the time,and about all that was required to be considered very dangerous.
4.Theobserver sat in the front; the pilot to his rear.
5.Itwas a pusher aircraft; which left the observer/gunner free to utilize the stillrare, and still more dangerous, machine gun in an offensive role.
6.Theengine was considered quite powerful for its day, which contributed to therather high speed of which it was capable.
Old 06-02-2016, 01:48 PM
  #13108  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Evening clue. You will notice the first two words of each clue are not separated by a space. There is a space between the two words in the document from which I copy the clues; and I see a space when I paste the clues. For some reason, the spaces are removed after I paste the clues. When I try to edit the post, it takes a very long time to do so, and sometimes I can't edit the post at all. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What early warbird do I describe?

Clues:
1.Thisaircraft was considered to be quite fast in its day.
2.Itwas also considered to be quite dangerous by its opponents.
3.Thisaircraft was armed with a machine gun; which was pretty unusual at the time,and about all that was required to be considered very dangerous.
4.Theobserver sat in the front; the pilot to his rear.
5.Itwas a pusher aircraft; which left the observer/gunner free to utilize the stillrare, and still more dangerous, machine gun in an offensive role.
6.Theengine was considered quite powerful for its day, which contributed to therather high speed of which it was capable.
7.Theengine was first introduced in 1914.
Old 06-02-2016, 01:52 PM
  #13109  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Evening clue. You will notice the first two words of each clue are not separated by a space. There is a space between the two words in the document from which I copy the clues; and I see a space when I paste the clues. For some reason, the spaces are removed after I paste the clues. When I try to edit the post, it takes a very long time to do so, and sometimes I can't edit the post at all. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What early warbird do I describe?

Clues:
1.This aircraft was considered to be quite fast in its day.
2.It was also considered to be quite dangerous by its opponents.
3.This aircraft was armed with a machine gun; which was pretty unusual at the time,and about all that was required to be considered very dangerous.
4.The observer sat in the front; the pilot to his rear.
5.It was a pusher aircraft; which left the observer/gunner free to utilize the still rare, and still more dangerous, machine gun in an offensive role.
6.The engine was considered quite powerful for its day, which contributed to therather high speed of which it was capable.
7.The engine was first introduced in 1914.
Old 06-02-2016, 03:32 PM
  #13110  
sjhanc
My Feedback: (3)
 
sjhanc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: williston, FL
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Dh.2
Old 06-02-2016, 06:41 PM
  #13111  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sjhanc
Dh.2
Welcome, sjhanc; and have fun with us. No, not the single seat Dh2. This was a two seater. However, to reward your participation, here is a bonus clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What early warbird do I describe?

Clues:
1.This aircraft was considered to be quite fast in its day.
2.It was also considered to be quite dangerous by its opponents.
3.This aircraft was armed with a machine gun; which was pretty unusual at the time,and about all that was required to be considered very dangerous.
4.The observer sat in the front; the pilot to his rear.
5.It was a pusher aircraft; which left the observer/gunner free to utilize the still rare, and still more dangerous, machine gun in an offensive role.
6.The engine was considered quite powerful for its day, which contributed to therather high speed of which it was capable.
7.The engine was first introduced in 1914.
8.A single float plane version was produced.
Old 06-02-2016, 08:35 PM
  #13112  
sjhanc
My Feedback: (3)
 
sjhanc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: williston, FL
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Sorry, F.E.2
Old 06-03-2016, 01:41 AM
  #13113  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sjhanc
Sorry, F.E.2
No, not the F.E. 2; although the F.E. 2 and this plane did share some common characteristics. Perhaps this morning clue will narrow your search. Thanks; Ernie P.



Question: What early warbird do I describe?

Clues:
1.This aircraft was considered to be quite fast in its day.
2.It was also considered to be quite dangerous by its opponents.
3.This aircraft was armed with a machine gun; which was pretty unusual at the time,and about all that was required to be considered very dangerous.
4.The observer sat in the front; the pilot to his rear.
5.It was a pusher aircraft; which left the observer/gunner free to utilize the still rare, and still more dangerous, machine gun in an offensive role.
6.The engine was considered quite powerful for its day, which contributed to therather high speed of which it was capable.
7.The engine was first introduced in 1914.
8.A single float plane version was produced.
9.This aircraft had, unfortunately, a rather short service life.
Old 06-03-2016, 08:37 AM
  #13114  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How about the AGO C II ?
Old 06-03-2016, 11:37 AM
  #13115  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zippome
How about the AGO C II ?
No, Zip; not the AGO CII. For one thing, there were only around a dozen of the AGO CII's produced. And, there were two, not one, float plane versions produced. But, to be fair, it WAS the AGO CI I had in mind; and I guess that's close enough. And, it's probably the plane you had in mind anyhow, knowing your expertise. The AGO CI was a recon plane, but since it was armed with a front firing machine gun, it was often used as a fighter, or pursuit plane as they were then known. It was quickly overshadowed by the Fokker E.I, so it's place in History was rather short. So, you are now up, Sir. Make it a good one, Zip! Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What early warbird do I describe?

Clues:
1. This aircraft was considered to be quite fast in its day.
2. It was also considered to be quite dangerous by its opponents.
3. This aircraft was armed with a machine gun; which was pretty unusual at the time, and about all that was required to be considered very dangerous.
4. The observer sat in the front; the pilot to his rear.
5. It was a pusher aircraft; which left the observer/gunner free to utilize the still rare, and still more dangerous, machine gun in an offensive role.
6. The engine was considered quite powerful for its day, which contributed to the rather high speed of which it was capable.
7. The engine was first introduced in 1914.
8. A single float plane version was produced.
9. This aircraft had, unfortunately, a rather short service life.
10. It suffered by comparison with an aircraft creating rather a scourge among allied aircraft.
11. It came into service around the same time as the aircraft mentioned in (10) above.
12. It was, like the Dh.2 and the F.E.2, a pusher aircraft, with the tail surfaces attached by two booms.


The AGO C.I was a First World War German pusher reconnaissance biplane that used a pod-and-boom configuration.

The crew and pusher engine shared a central nacelle, and the twin booms carried the tail and the four-wheeled landing gear. The observer sat at the nose and was armed with a machine-gun. It was produced in both two bay and three bay versions. A single example was fitted with floats for coastal patrol duties for the Imperial German Navy (designation C.I-W).

[h=2]Operators[edit][/h] German Empire

[h=2]Specifications[/h]General characteristics
  • Crew: two, pilot and observer
  • Length: 9.0 m (29 ft 6 in)
  • Wingspan: 15.0 m (49 ft 2 in)
  • Wing area: 41.5 m[SUP]2[/SUP] (447 ft[SUP]2[/SUP])
  • Powerplant: 1 Χ Mercedes D.III, 117 kW (158 hp)
Performance
  • Maximum speed: 140 km/h (90 mph)
  • Range: 480 km (300 miles)
  • Service ceiling: 4,800 m (16,000 ft)
Armament
Old 06-03-2016, 01:29 PM
  #13116  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zippome
How about the AGO C II ?
Zip; I forgot to say "Congratulations and well done!" on your answer. Few people have even heard of the AGO CI or CII. Good job on your part, buddy. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 06-03-2016, 05:33 PM
  #13117  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Actually Ernie, that was wild guess so you would toss us another clue! 😉
OK, lemme dig something up, and I'll be back with a new quiz!

Last edited by zippome; 06-03-2016 at 05:34 PM. Reason: Misspellings
Old 06-03-2016, 07:07 PM
  #13118  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zippome
Actually Ernie, that was wild guess so you would toss us another clue! 
OK, lemme dig something up, and I'll be back with a new quiz!
A wild guess? At least you knew of the plane; so that makes it, at worst, an educated guess. Looking forward to your question, Zip. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 06-05-2016, 10:28 AM
  #13119  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok guys, here we go again....

1. This aircraft first took to the sky during the 80's.
2. A single engine powers this aircraft thru the sky. ,
There's a start.. it's not much I know, but at least there's no bubblegum involved. .....yet.....
Old 06-05-2016, 11:21 AM
  #13120  
tunakuts3d
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: streamwood, IL
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yakolev Yak-41 Freestyle/Yak 141 VTOL ? W.A.G.

Last edited by tunakuts3d; 06-05-2016 at 12:58 PM.
Old 06-05-2016, 06:25 PM
  #13121  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not the Yakkity Yak!

Ok guys, here we go again....

1. This aircraft first took to the sky during the 80's.
2. A single engine powers this aircraft thru the sky.
3. It looks like there are 4 militaries that use this aircraft.
4. The U.S. bought a couple.

There's a start..
Thanks!
Zip
Old 06-05-2016, 06:35 PM
  #13122  
tunakuts3d
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: streamwood, IL
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Alenia Aermacchi S-211 ?

Last edited by tunakuts3d; 06-06-2016 at 02:20 PM. Reason: corrected typo to 211
Old 06-06-2016, 06:26 PM
  #13123  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry, not the S-21 nor the s-211 .
Ok guys, here we go again....

1. This aircraft first took to the sky during the 80's.
2. A single engine powers this aircraft thru the sky.
3. It looks like there are 4 militaries that use this aircraft.
4. The U.S. bought a couple.
5. Can be equipped with rockets and or cannons.
6. But, in my own opinion... that may look cool until you're in a situation in this aircraft to actually need them.
Ok, thats it for now....
Thanks!
Zip

There's a start..
Thanks!
Zip
Old 06-07-2016, 06:27 PM
  #13124  
zippome
Senior Member
 
zippome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok guys, here we go again....

1. This aircraft first took to the sky during the 80's.
2. A single engine powers this aircraft thru the sky.
3. It looks like there are 4 militaries that use this aircraft.
4. The U.S. bought a couple.
5. Can be equipped with rockets and or cannons.
6. But, in my own opinion... that may look cool until you're in a situation in this aircraft to actually need them.
7. It has a crew of 2.
8. But there is a version where they are optional.

Ok, thats it for now....
Thanks!
Zip

There's a start..
Thanks!
Zip
Old 06-07-2016, 07:10 PM
  #13125  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,524
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Dassault/ Dornier Alpha jet

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.