Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Knowledge Quiz for Warbird wiz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2016, 11:33 PM
  #13401  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,524
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

And pd1 got it. The B-66 Destroyer/A-3 Skywarrior
Time to go over the clues:
1) This plane was used by both the Navy and Air Force of the country it was manufactured in
It was used off carriers and land bases by the US Navy and USAF
2) This plane was manufactured by a company known for it's combat aircraft's outstanding records
In this case Douglas, who's SBD Dauntless, AD-1 Skyraider, A-4 Skyhawk and F-4 Phantoms became legends of their days
3) This plane was one of three different types in service at the same time manufactured by one company
The B-66/A-3,A-4 and F-4 were all used at the same time, sharing the flight decks until the A-4 was phased out in favor of the A-7 Corsair II
4) This plane was the only one of the three(from clue #3) that was used operationally in several different configurations requiring an internal reworking to facilitate the different task specific requirements
Many other uses for the aircraft were developed, resulting in many variants, including the KA-3B (aerial refueling), EA-3A/B (electronic reconnaissance), ERA-3B (electronic countermeasures), RA-3 (photo reconnaissance), TA-3B (radar training), EKA-3B (combined tanker/countermeasures/strike), test work (NA-3B and NRA-3B), and even a VIP transport model (VA-3B). One was on board the USS Kitty hawk during it's 1984 and 1985 deployments, as I helped troubleshoot an issue with one of it's systems in 1984.
5) Of the three planes referred to in clue three, this was not the one with a single engine
Both the F-4 and A-3 used twin engines, the A-4 was powered by a single engine
6) This plane used one of two different engines, depending on the branch of service was flying it
The Navy version was powered by the Pratt & Whitney J-57 while the Air Force version was powered by Allison J-71s

Pd1 has told me he won't be able to put up a quiz due to other obligations so the floor is open
Old 09-20-2016, 01:48 AM
  #13402  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hydro Junkie
And pd1 got it. The B-66 Destroyer/A-3 Skywarrior
Time to go over the clues:
1) This plane was used by both the Navy and Air Force of the country it was manufactured in
It was used off carriers and land bases by the US Navy and USAF
2) This plane was manufactured by a company known for it's combat aircraft's outstanding records
In this case Douglas, who's SBD Dauntless, AD-1 Skyraider, A-4 Skyhawk and F-4 Phantoms became legends of their days
3) This plane was one of three different types in service at the same time manufactured by one company
The B-66/A-3,A-4 and F-4 were all used at the same time, sharing the flight decks until the A-4 was phased out in favor of the A-7 Corsair II
4) This plane was the only one of the three(from clue #3) that was used operationally in several different configurations requiring an internal reworking to facilitate the different task specific requirements
Many other uses for the aircraft were developed, resulting in many variants, including the KA-3B (aerial refueling), EA-3A/B (electronic reconnaissance), ERA-3B (electronic countermeasures), RA-3 (photo reconnaissance), TA-3B (radar training), EKA-3B (combined tanker/countermeasures/strike), test work (NA-3B and NRA-3B), and even a VIP transport model (VA-3B). One was on board the USS Kitty hawk during it's 1984 and 1985 deployments, as I helped troubleshoot an issue with one of it's systems in 1984.
5) Of the three planes referred to in clue three, this was not the one with a single engine
Both the F-4 and A-3 used twin engines, the A-4 was powered by a single engine
6) This plane used one of two different engines, depending on the branch of service was flying it
The Navy version was powered by the Pratt & Whitney J-57 while the Air Force version was powered by Allison J-71s

Pd1 has told me he won't be able to put up a quiz due to other obligations so the floor is open
Good question, Hydro Junkie. Okay, folks; Pd1 has declared the floor is open. First to ask a question has the floor. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 09-20-2016, 05:50 AM
  #13403  
elmshoot
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, IN,
Posts: 1,705
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Wow I guess i didn't check back soon enough. I think I would have guessed that one. I was on Enterprise in 85 and we tried repeatedly to kill the Whale and crew.
Sending them on a bingo to an airfield that was closed... holdback on the airplane broke on the Cat at night. IFR probe broken and bent 90 degrees straight up after trying to tank on an A7 tanker. I was glad to see they removed the plane from the flight deck eventually, sadly they managed to kill a crew of 7 on Nimitz in the Med.
Seeing that plane in the Case1 landing pattern it looked like an airliner getting ready to land aboard. Then when it did touch down it would rebound a little bit back into the air. Known as the "Whale Dance"
Sparky
Old 09-20-2016, 08:27 AM
  #13404  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,524
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

We didn't have anything quite that dramatic with our Whale. The guys from the "Bat Det" were a bunch of pros when it came to that big bird. Had more issues with the stupid yellow shirts than we did with the Whale. I wouldn't mind having one of those myself. Would make a really nice flying RV if properly set up
Old 09-20-2016, 06:14 PM
  #13405  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Okay, folks; the floor is still open. If any one has a question, feel free to post it. First come, etc. I think you've all heard enough from me recently, but if no one posts anything by tomorrow afternoon I'll try to come up with something. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 09-21-2016, 05:39 AM
  #13406  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Last chance, guys. Otherwise, I'll post something this afternoon. Thanks; Ernie P.
Old 09-21-2016, 02:19 PM
  #13407  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

And once more into the breach. Thank; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?

Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
Old 09-22-2016, 01:14 AM
  #13408  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

A morning clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
Old 09-22-2016, 01:32 PM
  #13409  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

And yet another clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
3. It was a very advanced aircraft for its time.
Old 09-23-2016, 02:12 AM
  #13410  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

A morning clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
3. It was a very advanced aircraft for its time.
4. In fact, only one other manufacturer was producing aircraft which could even be called “comparable” as relates to their modernish design.
Old 09-23-2016, 07:16 AM
  #13411  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,524
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Okay, I'll bite.
How about the Curtis F9C Sparrowhawk?
There was only 7 built and used operationally by the US Navy

Last edited by Hydro Junkie; 09-23-2016 at 07:18 AM.
Old 09-23-2016, 01:31 PM
  #13412  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hydro Junkie
Okay, I'll bite.
How about the Curtis F9C Sparrowhawk?
There was only 7 built and used operationally by the US Navy
A really good answer, Hydro Junkie. Not correct, of course, but a very good answer still. And, you have earned a bonus clue! Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
3. It was a very advanced aircraft for its time.
4. In fact, only one other manufacturer was producing aircraft which could even be called “comparable” as relates to their very modernish design.
5. Various models utilized various engines, from various manufacturers.
Old 09-24-2016, 12:23 AM
  #13413  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Morning clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
3. It was a very advanced aircraft for its time.
4. In fact, only one other manufacturer was producing aircraft which could even be called “comparable” as relates to their very modernish design.
5. Various models utilized various engines, from various manufacturers.
6. Both inline and radial engines were used.
Old 09-24-2016, 12:31 PM
  #13414  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Evening clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
3. It was a very advanced aircraft for its time.
4. In fact, only one other manufacturer was producing aircraft which could even be called “comparable” as relates to their very modernish design.
5. Various models utilized various engines, from various manufacturers.
6. Both inline and radial engines were used.
7. It was in production for more than ten years.
Old 09-24-2016, 06:38 PM
  #13415  
elmshoot
My Feedback: (6)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, IN,
Posts: 1,705
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

DR-7
Sparky
Old 09-24-2016, 09:16 PM
  #13416  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by elmshoot
DR-7
Sparky
Sparky; I'm not familiar with the DR-7. The Fokker D-7, of course; but not a DR-7. However, I'm intrigued enough to award a bonus clue. Could you help me out by identifying the DR-7 and telling us alt abut it? Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
3. It was a very advanced aircraft for its time.
4. In fact, only one other manufacturer was producing aircraft which could even be called “comparable” as relates to their very modernish design.
5. Various models utilized various engines, from various manufacturers.
6. Both inline and radial engines were used.
7. It was in production for more than ten years.
8. It was in regular use for more than twenty years.
Old 09-25-2016, 03:46 AM
  #13417  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Morning clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
3. It was a very advanced aircraft for its time.
4. In fact, only one other manufacturer was producing aircraft which could even be called “comparable” as relates to their modernish design.
5. Various models utilized various engines, from various manufacturers.
6. Both inline and radial engines were used.
7. It was in production for more than ten years.
8. It was in regular use for more than twenty years.
9. It was utilized as a passenger plane, a bomber and as a transport.
Old 09-25-2016, 03:22 PM
  #13418  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Evening clue. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
3. It was a very advanced aircraft for its time.
4. In fact, only one other manufacturer was producing aircraft which could even be called “comparable” as relates to their modernish design.
5. Various models utilized various engines, from various manufacturers.
6. Both inline and radial engines were used.
7. It was in production for more than ten years.
8. It was in regular use for more than twenty years.
9. It was utilized as a passenger plane, a bomber and as a transport.
10. However, it was first introduced as a transport plane; one which could easily be utilized as a passenger plane.
Old 09-25-2016, 04:38 PM
  #13419  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,524
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

He-111?
Old 09-25-2016, 08:25 PM
  #13420  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hydro Junkie
He-111?
Hydro Junkie; that is a really good answer. It is, however, incorrect. Keep trying; you'll get it. And here's another clue to reward your effort. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
3. It was a very advanced aircraft for its time.
4. In fact, only one other manufacturer was producing aircraft which could even be called “comparable” as relates to their modernish design.
5. Various models utilized various engines, from various manufacturers.
6. Both inline and radial engines were used.
7. It was in production for more than ten years.
8. It was in regular use for more than twenty years.
9. It was utilized as a passenger plane, a bomber and as a transport.
10. However, it was first introduced as a transport plane; one which could easily be utilized as a passenger plane.
11. One of the reasons for its popularity was the ease with which alternate landing gear could be fitted.
Old 09-26-2016, 02:24 AM
  #13421  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Morning clue. Thanks; Ernie P.



Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
3. It was a very advanced aircraft for its time.
4. In fact, only one other manufacturer was producing aircraft which could even be called “comparable” as relates to their modernish design.
5. Various models utilized various engines, from various manufacturers.
6. Both inline and radial engines were used.
7. It was in production for more than ten years.
8. It was in regular use for more than twenty years.
9. It was utilized as a passenger plane, a bomber and as a transport.
10. However, it was first introduced as a transport plane; one which could easily be utilized as a passenger plane.
11. One of the reasons for its popularity was the ease with which alternate landing gear could be fitted.
12. It was a low wing monoplane.
Old 09-26-2016, 07:04 AM
  #13422  
Hydro Junkie
 
Hydro Junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marysville, WA
Posts: 10,524
Received 130 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Boeing 247
Old 09-26-2016, 10:20 AM
  #13423  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hydro Junkie
Boeing 247
Not a 247, Hydro Junkie; but this afternoon clue may help. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
3. It was a very advanced aircraft for its time.
4. In fact, only one other manufacturer was producing aircraft which could even be called “comparable” as relates to their modernish design.
5. Various models utilized various engines, from various manufacturers.
6. Both inline and radial engines were used.
7. It was in production for more than ten years.
8. It was in regular use for more than twenty years.
9. It was utilized as a passenger plane, a bomber and as a transport.
10. However, it was first introduced as a transport plane; one which could easily be utilized as a passenger plane.
11. One of the reasons for its popularity was the ease with which alternate landing gear could be fitted.
12. It was a low wing monoplane.
13. It was a cantilever monoplane.
Old 09-26-2016, 03:09 PM
  #13424  
SimonCraig1
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hilo, HI
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Blohm & Voss BV 142?
Old 09-26-2016, 08:24 PM
  #13425  
Ernie P.
Senior Member
My Feedback: (3)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bealeton, VA
Posts: 7,086
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SimonCraig1
The Blohm & Voss BV 142?
Not the BV 142, Sir; but a good guess nonetheless. Here's a bonus clue for participating. Thanks; Ernie P.


Question: What warbird do I describe?
Clues:
1. Perhaps the most amazing fact about this warbird is the annual production number was only a few numbers greater than the number of countries utilizing it.
2. It is noted for two significant “firsts”.
3. It was a very advanced aircraft for its time.
4. In fact, only one other manufacturer was producing aircraft which could even be called “comparable” as relates to their modernish design.
5. Various models utilized various engines, from various manufacturers.
6. Both inline and radial engines were used.
7. It was in production for more than ten years.
8. It was in regular use for more than twenty years.
9. It was utilized as a passenger plane, a bomber and as a transport.
10. However, it was first introduced as a transport plane; one which could easily be utilized as a passenger plane.
11. One of the reasons for its popularity was the ease with which alternate landing gear could be fitted.
12. It was a low wing monoplane.
13. It was a cantilever monoplane.
14. Without any supporting wires or external bracing.


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.