Which is harder to fly
#4
My Feedback: (3)
RE: Which is harder to fly
ORIGINAL: jmdlcar
I'm new to this is why I ask. I'm retire and don't have a lot money to spend.
I'm new to this is why I ask. I'm retire and don't have a lot money to spend.
The problem with starting out with a nice P-51 is that getting familiar with the control movements can cost you an airplane in a matter of seconds. With the simulator, you just press "reset" after a crash.
After you get familar with the flying process on the simulator, you can choose which plane you want to start with. I would wager a P51 might not be your first choice, after flying a few simulator planes.
Best wishes,
Dave Olson
#6
RE: Which is harder to fly
Jack,Jim is right.The war birds always look great to the beginner and the thought of flying a mustang is most everyones dream.You need to start with something that looks like a piper cub.Then after you get the hang of it go to a low wing,then a war bird.These are not toys but small airplanes. Planes like the mustang were designed for speed and manuverability,they react fast.Start easy just like real pilots do.
Tom
Tom
#9
Senior Member
RE: Which is harder to fly
Real Flite has a new product out for beginners, runs right about a hundred bucks, program and basic controller. Try Towers website or go to your local Hobby Shop, also there's other sims on the market for the same price. Make sure you know the operating system on you home computer, ram, cpu speed, video card type; i.e. Nvidea, ATI to include your video ram and so on, and finally how much room you have remaining on the hard drive. The reason is to ensure you purchase the right sim for the type of computer you have. Most windows XP machines will run just about all sims on the market, do your research, and if you have a Mac or Apple make sure the sim is for that OS.
#10
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Marysville,
OH
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which is harder to fly
Here is my Specifications:
Athlon 64 X2 (B) 4400+ 2.3 GHz
Integrated GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 128mb
Memory Installed 2 GB
Hard drive 320 GB SATA 3G (3.0 Gb/sec) 7200 rpm
16X DVD(+/-)R/RW 12X RAM (+/-)R DL LightScribe SATA drive
Sound/Audio High Definition 8-channel audio
Integrated 10/100 Base-T networking interface
Operating System Windows 7 Home Premium
Do I have enough?
Athlon 64 X2 (B) 4400+ 2.3 GHz
Integrated GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 128mb
Memory Installed 2 GB
Hard drive 320 GB SATA 3G (3.0 Gb/sec) 7200 rpm
16X DVD(+/-)R/RW 12X RAM (+/-)R DL LightScribe SATA drive
Sound/Audio High Definition 8-channel audio
Integrated 10/100 Base-T networking interface
Operating System Windows 7 Home Premium
Do I have enough?
#11
Senior Member
RE: Which is harder to fly
jmdlcar,
Yes, you have a very good system and it will handle all types of sims on the market. When purchasing a flight sim, use your system configuration (what you posted) to ensure that the sim requirements will run on your system. Again there's plenty to pick and choose from, flight sims, Real Flite 5.0 IMHO is the best sim on the market, it provides photo fields, realistic training aids, trainer to advanced aircraft, and etc. Cost for Real Flite 5.0 is $200 from your local hobby shop or on line, but if you are looking for something less expensive, do some research and ask questions.
Yes, you have a very good system and it will handle all types of sims on the market. When purchasing a flight sim, use your system configuration (what you posted) to ensure that the sim requirements will run on your system. Again there's plenty to pick and choose from, flight sims, Real Flite 5.0 IMHO is the best sim on the market, it provides photo fields, realistic training aids, trainer to advanced aircraft, and etc. Cost for Real Flite 5.0 is $200 from your local hobby shop or on line, but if you are looking for something less expensive, do some research and ask questions.
#14
My Feedback: (3)
RE: Which is harder to fly
ORIGINAL: jmdlcar
I'm 62 so thought I would start a hobby so I'm new to this.
I'm 62 so thought I would start a hobby so I'm new to this.
I learned a bunch on the Dave Brown flight sim, got it at a swap meet for a hundred or something like that. Came with a transmitter-like controller. Tried a couple of cheapo Flight Sim discs off the rack, $19, and they were good to learn stuff with - but no transmitter or controller.
There are very expensive ones that are realistic and have a lot of planes, but I think you cannot go wrong with any sim that will work on your computer (and comes with a controller that looks like conventional transmitter.) And frankly, the cost of the expensive types is less than the cost of a good glow trainer setup.
Another way to become a more informed consumer is to check with any nearby clubs or flyers. There's a list of AMA clubs on the AMA website (http://www.modelaircraft.org/)
Good luck,
Dave Olson
#15
Senior Member
RE: Which is harder to fly
ORIGINAL: Scar
And you're starting the right way - becoming an informed consumer.
I learned a bunch on the Dave Brown flight sim, got it at a swap meet for a hundred or something like that. Came with a transmitter-like controller. Tried a couple of cheapo Flight Sim discs off the rack, $19, and they were good to learn stuff with - but no transmitter or controller.
There are very expensive ones that are realistic and have a lot of planes, but I think you cannot go wrong with any sim that will work on your computer (and comes with a controller that looks like conventional transmitter.) And frankly, the cost of the expensive types is less than the cost of a good glow trainer setup.
Another way to become a more informed consumer is to check with any nearby clubs or flyers. There's a list of AMA clubs on the AMA website (http://www.modelaircraft.org/)
Good luck,
Dave Olson
ORIGINAL: jmdlcar
I'm 62 so thought I would start a hobby so I'm new to this.
I'm 62 so thought I would start a hobby so I'm new to this.
I learned a bunch on the Dave Brown flight sim, got it at a swap meet for a hundred or something like that. Came with a transmitter-like controller. Tried a couple of cheapo Flight Sim discs off the rack, $19, and they were good to learn stuff with - but no transmitter or controller.
There are very expensive ones that are realistic and have a lot of planes, but I think you cannot go wrong with any sim that will work on your computer (and comes with a controller that looks like conventional transmitter.) And frankly, the cost of the expensive types is less than the cost of a good glow trainer setup.
Another way to become a more informed consumer is to check with any nearby clubs or flyers. There's a list of AMA clubs on the AMA website (http://www.modelaircraft.org/)
Good luck,
Dave Olson
Jack, I agree with Mr. Olson, since you are new to the hobby, visit a local flying field and hobby shop. You can visit the AMA website as stated from Mr. Olsons post to find the nearest AMA certified club/field. Jack here is the best thing to do, purchase an RC sim, practice on it and work with your local club, they have instructor pilots that can train you how to fly RC planes. Ask if the club has their own trainers, my club has two trainers to use when we are actively recruiting new members or providing intro flights for the scouts even local kids wanting to learn about the hobby. Jack, just remember this you are never too old to learn something new, welcome to the hobby and good luck.
#18
My Feedback: (3)
RE: Which is harder to fly
ORIGINAL: jmdlcar
After take off should reduce engine power or should stay at full power?
After take off should reduce engine power or should stay at full power?
That trim operation is best done at part throttle.
I presume that wasn't really your question though, so let me add this. It will take more power to take off and gain altitude than it t does to maintain straight & level flight, or fly around the pattern at constant altitude. That being the case, I always recommend that a student reduce throttle to about half, or whatever it takes to keep the plane flying at constant altitude.
The reason I suggest that is because the learning process involves making mistakes. Recovery from mistakes is most convenient with a slower moving plane.
So, I suggest the throttle be reduced shortly after takeoff, to near the minimum required for constant altitude flight.
Just my opinion,
Dave Olson
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: so. barrington,
IL
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Which is harder to fly
[quote]ORIGINAL: Scar
ORIGINAL: jmdlcar
So, I suggest the throttle be reduced shortly after takeoff, to near the minimum required for constant altitude flight.Just my opinion,
Dave Olson
So, I suggest the throttle be reduced shortly after takeoff, to near the minimum required for constant altitude flight.Just my opinion,
Dave Olson
Really?
#20
My Feedback: (3)
RE: Which is harder to fly
ORIGINAL: matus777
ORIGINAL: Scar
Really?
ORIGINAL: jmdlcar
So, I suggest the throttle be reduced shortly after takeoff, to near the minimum required for constant altitude flight.Just my opinion,
Dave Olson
So, I suggest the throttle be reduced shortly after takeoff, to near the minimum required for constant altitude flight.Just my opinion,
Dave Olson
Really?
And yes, when I have a student on the second controller, I have them throttle back once they're at a 2-mistake altitude.
Best wishes,
Dave Olson
#22
My Feedback: (221)
RE: Which is harder to fly
If you are going with small electric warbird stuff, I would recommend a Corsair, to start out with. The gull wings add extra dihedral that make the rudder more effective and tone down the overall flight characteristics. These small Corsairs fly extremely well and look good doing it.
I say this from personal experience, not conjecture. Yes, they are all fairly easy, but some are just easier than others, and that seems to be what your looking for. Hope you have fun with what you decide on. It is a great hobby, if you don't weaken.
The sim is definitely the way to go to develop 'mussel memory' for this hobby. Although it is an investment, it can ultimately save you hundreds of dollars. Google 'G5 RC simulators' and you will find several places to buy them.
I say this from personal experience, not conjecture. Yes, they are all fairly easy, but some are just easier than others, and that seems to be what your looking for. Hope you have fun with what you decide on. It is a great hobby, if you don't weaken.
The sim is definitely the way to go to develop 'mussel memory' for this hobby. Although it is an investment, it can ultimately save you hundreds of dollars. Google 'G5 RC simulators' and you will find several places to buy them.
#23
My Feedback: (38)
RE: Which is harder to fly
yea i think the corsair has better landing tendencies than the mustang , on my pacific warbirds sim , its the only plane i was able to land. you have to really grease the mustang in at high speed . the hellcat or 47 would probly be about the same as the u bird.
#24
Senior Member
RE: Which is harder to fly
ORIGINAL: jmdlcar
I'm 62 so thought I would start a hobby so I'm new to this.
I'm 62 so thought I would start a hobby so I'm new to this.
Best advice is look for a local club and see about connecting with an experienced instructor.