Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Warbirds and Warplanes
Reload this Page >

Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

Community
Search
Notices
RC Warbirds and Warplanes Discuss rc warbirds and warplanes in this forum.

Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2010, 03:17 PM
  #1  
jbettinelli
Junior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Barrie, ON, CANADA
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

Hey all,

I am looking to buy a P-51 arf, 60 size. I am looking for input as to whether the way to go is Top Flite Gold P51 or H9 Mustang Blue nose.

Maybe there is also something out there comparative I haven't seen?

Looking to go 4 stroke, with retracts...

your input would be great

Thanks guys, happy flying...

Joe
Old 07-29-2010, 03:30 PM
  #2  
800mZero
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Warwick, RI
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

until we get reports on the new release of the blue nosei say go topflite. I own a blue nose.
Old 07-29-2010, 03:34 PM
  #3  
stang151
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Beaumont, CA
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

Top Flite.... Great flying plane... Can be made to look great as well
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	he97068.jpg
Views:	12
Size:	575.6 KB
ID:	1475130  
Old 07-29-2010, 06:09 PM
  #4  
RBean
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Lady Lake, FL
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

I've got the Top Flight. Tried to build light with .91 OS FS. Put the battery back, just in front of the tail wheel to get it to balance. Used Robart 700RS air up spring down retracts with 7/16 in robart struts. Came out at 9.5 lbs. Flies great, like it is own rails. Handling on take off and landing is easy for a warbird. The .91 is plenty of power. Not unlimited vertical, but plenty of scale like flying. Only mod was angling the gear forward slightly. Two guys at the club have the Hanger 9 Blue Nose. They have had lots of problems. They rarely fly. Mines a regular with over 50 flights on her since April.
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Hf97702.jpg
Views:	15
Size:	85.0 KB
ID:	1475225   Click image for larger version

Name:	Yt61590.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	89.7 KB
ID:	1475226  
Old 07-29-2010, 06:40 PM
  #5  
charlie1960
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Palestine, TX
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

Give the World Models P-51 a look. Builds light, looks good.
And i know it flys great.
I have the H9 Mustang too, flys great as well, just about 2 lbs heavier than the WM. Flys more like a warbird flys, than a sport plane.
Mine came in at a svelt 10lbs and 9oz without fuel. Saito 125 in the nose.
Old 07-29-2010, 07:06 PM
  #6  
CorsairJock
My Feedback: (90)
 
CorsairJock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Parchment, MI
Posts: 3,219
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

I'm thinking a quick read of the H-9 Blue Nose thread will convice you to go with the Top Flite.
Old 07-29-2010, 10:36 PM
  #7  
dvs1
Senior Member
 
dvs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kanab, UT
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

I do not own a Hangar 9 blue nose, but I have heard many people say they are a handful and have stability problems especially when landing.
I Have owned a few other Hangar 9 birds and every one has been built rather flimsy, I have a friend that has owned a couple too. and he got rid of them rather quick
too. both planes broke in half when he landed them just a bit too hard, any other plane would have been fine. but on both planes the fuses broke in half just behind the wing!
I have never seen that happen on any other manufactured plane.
Do not get me wrong I am not bashing on Hangar 9 at all, I am just stating the problems I have had and that I have seen with some of their planes. Again with the blue nose
mustang I am going by what many have said.
With that said, I have owned a few Top flite planes and they have flow excellent and are built very well, with very little needed to reinforce the planes.
So i would have to say go with the Top Flite unless you want a handful.
Old 07-30-2010, 06:46 AM
  #8  
jbettinelli
Junior Member
Thread Starter
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Barrie, ON, CANADA
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

Thanks for the input. I have been following the bluenose thread, but some say it flies just like a warbird, which is OK with me, but given the overall opinion, seems the Top-flite is just all together a better solution.

Any opinions on the Century retracts for this, or built up from robarts would be better?

Joe
Old 07-30-2010, 08:40 AM
  #9  
stang151
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Beaumont, CA
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

A friend has C/Js on his Top Flite ARF and except for a weard clicking noise every time it touches ground they seem to work fine. I have LADOs with Robart struts on mine and have had no probs at all.
Old 07-30-2010, 09:55 AM
  #10  
jmohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,060
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

If you want a nice P-51 you might also consider the Sig P-51B. It the same size and has flaps too. It comes with a nice spinner and flies great. It's very fast, but slows well with flaps deployed.

I have seen a bunch of issues with the Top Flight P-51s. Most of them were balanced with the CG where they recommend and been tail heavy by a bunch, so if you get one make sure you start with the CG way forward of what they recommend.


Jeff
Old 07-30-2010, 12:12 PM
  #11  
stang151
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Beaumont, CA
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

CG that I used is 5 1/4" back from the wing/fuse join, flys on rails.
Old 07-30-2010, 08:47 PM
  #12  
JET FX
 
JET FX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sydney, , AUSTRALIA
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

Ive owned a few Mustangs over the years small to large and depends whats more important to you when shopping for one. Iam a huge scale fan and this is my priority so the ones that I would be looking a little closer at as well as the ones already mentioned would be the ESM or KMP offerings as well, more 1.20 size but will fly much better due to lower wing loading...

Cheers- Marty
Old 07-31-2010, 07:38 PM
  #13  
Flak
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

My old TFGE kit built P-51 gave up the ghost. I have the O.S. 1.08 2 stroke, radio and retracts out of her. I am going to buy a "Hurry Home Honey" and install the 1.08 and retracts in her. I plan to give her a new radio. Considering the lighter weight of the ARF, she will be a rocket on rails! Here is a video of my old P-51: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XolyGD5EFY8
Old 08-04-2010, 01:32 PM
  #14  
IL2windhawk
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ogden, UT
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

At the risk of starting a feeding frenzy...

I was just in Tower's 'scratch & dent' section, and I saw a TF P-51D ARF (60-size) for $210. No damaged stated, and all that's missing is the stock retracts, which many choose to toss away anyway preferring robarts. Pretty good deal! You probably could stack a tower code on top for an even better deal. If I didn't already own 4 or 5 rc mustangs, I would've bught for sure.
Old 09-22-2010, 03:14 PM
  #15  
dbateman
My Feedback: (31)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Clarksboro, NJ
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

I'm re doing mine. How does the monocoat flat olive drab match what is on the arf covering. I read somewhere that it didn't but can't find it. I am doing a "B" conversion. So fuse is mostly olive.
Old 09-22-2010, 08:15 PM
  #16  
SCALECRAFT
My Feedback: (13)
 
SCALECRAFT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: MONTEBELLO, CA
Posts: 2,649
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

I have an OS .61RF in my CMP 54" span P-51D. Its cheap, looks really good and is pretty fast with good .61 engine and mech retracts..

Steve
Old 09-22-2010, 09:12 PM
  #17  
prop wash
 
prop wash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Griffith, IN
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

TOP FLITE ! I had two TFGS P51's [lost one]and I have watched Jim[Corsair jock] fly his and many others and I would say easily"Top Flite".Tom
Old 09-22-2010, 10:04 PM
  #18  
Desertlakesflying
My Feedback: (28)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sun Valley, NV
Posts: 2,901
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

I still have the old Hangar 9 and it is rock solid in every way. It's also now almost 7 years old, and still flies like it's on rails. Never did have any problems with the gear except the threads on the servo shaft and horn going bad about 4 years ago, but a little JB weld fixed that. Can't say much about the blue nose. I like the scheme, but haven't flown it. I like my old one too much.

No matter which one you go with I'd go with the OS 120 pumper for power and a 15X7 3 blade.
Old 09-23-2010, 12:22 AM
  #19  
jamesc43
Senior Member
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

I've had the World Models Mustang P-51 60 ( Blue nose). It was a great flyer. The landing gear seamed stiff and you could hear the
harder landing through the fuselage. Overall, it flew great and handled good on the ground.

I've bought a older H9 Mustang P-51 (Marie edition) used. The original buyer installed Robart air retracts and struts. The radio gear is mostly
installed. I hope to have the engine repaired and installed by the weekend so I can do some taxi runs and maybe a first flight.

I also have a NIB Top Flite Mustang P-51 (60 size). I hope to have it ready for our local Warbird event next year. I hope to have
some scale details installed by then as well.
Old 09-23-2010, 08:00 AM
  #20  
JeffH
My Feedback: (43)
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Carrollton, VA
Posts: 2,290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default RE: Mustang comparative evaluations..battle of the owners?

The Top Flite flies great. I can do the basic pattern sequence with ease. It slow and point rolls just like a pattern plane. The airframe is VERY strong, the gear mounts, are typical ARF, weak, but not terrible. I mine has been radar'd at 110 mph with a YS 120. WAY too fast, but its fun.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.