RCM Plans Corkscrew
#102
For my next airplane build I am looking at low wing models. I, too, found the 80" Corkscrew and have it downloaded. I've been studying the model. Still not sure which model I will build. Post your build as you progress.
#103
My Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Copperas Cove, Tx.
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jeff, If your scaling up to a 92 incher you might want to consider going to a 30cc to get the performance out of it. Remember that when scaling up an object like this its going to be a volumetric scale. It looks 2D on paper but the mass is 3D as well as the associated weight. A 20cc gasser is roughly the same power as a 1.20 Four-Stroke which the 80" was designed around. Going up to 92" might be a little much for the 20cc for all but general flying around.
Food for thought,
Mike
Last edited by optech; 07-16-2015 at 12:36 PM.
#104
I did find the plans on Outerzone. Thanks for taking the time to submit them to Outerzone. That helps lots of modelers looking for a plane to build. Outerzone has so many plans that the hard part is deciding which to build. I am in that delemma now. Which Oh Which to build. Thanks again.
#105
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi all! Just reminiscing my early days in RC, Corkscrew came to mind and I jumped on this thread. My bird is long gone but so exciting to fly, like no other plane I had before or since. Never knew what a flat spin was until I yanked the stick hard one day with WOT. Fortunately she had enough altitude and I learned real quick how to recover, just wouldn't pull out on its own! I was just shocked at what this plane would do. I fly electrics now and thought I'd give it a try with foamboard. Yeah I know, kinda sounds wimpy but never tried foamboard before but wood and Monokote are expensive and ARF's have dulled my creative skills. Thought I would use my Rimfire .10 motor and scale the Corkscrew down a bit. One thing I never understood about this bird is why the swept-back LG?
#106
My Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Copperas Cove, Tx.
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The swept back landing gear is because the generally accepted wheel axle position for a tail dragger is at, or just slightly forward, of the wings leading edge. This position is a compromise as the closer to the CG you are the better. However, the leading edge position will aid ground loop prevention but still be far enough ahead of the CG to prevent nose tip overs. Of course if you fly from a rough field you can move the axle position forward and vice-versa if you have a nice smooth paved runway to fly from.
Farther from CG = will make the plane easier to ground loop and take away from tracking under power.
Closer to CG = better ground handling but easier to tip the plane on its nose and break a prop.
Also be sure to take into account that this is for a straight wing. If the Wing is a swept back design then the wheel position to go farther back as well. The relationship to the CG doesn't change.
Mike
Last edited by optech; 04-11-2016 at 11:12 PM.
#107
I saw the prototype in 82' at the Goldenrod Fl field, man that thing was doing things I can't pronounce . Stu was getting a good work out . and co did the corkscrew. He put it away and took the old quaker out and would put up till it was just a dot, set the tx by his chair and would light a cigar watching it make large circles. ahh the memories.
#108
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice story br, wish I could go back and do it all over again.
I finished my 36" version made out of Dollar Tree foamboard. Put a Rimfire .10 in the nose with 3s 2200mah lipo and getting 8-minute flights easily. Wing has no dihedral. I'm still trimming it out, need more down-thrust so haven't tried anything radical yet. Just wondering how lack of dihedral will affect agility.
Zep
I finished my 36" version made out of Dollar Tree foamboard. Put a Rimfire .10 in the nose with 3s 2200mah lipo and getting 8-minute flights easily. Wing has no dihedral. I'm still trimming it out, need more down-thrust so haven't tried anything radical yet. Just wondering how lack of dihedral will affect agility.
Zep
#109
Nice story br, wish I could go back and do it all over again.
I finished my 36" version made out of Dollar Tree foamboard. Put a Rimfire .10 in the nose with 3s 2200mah lipo and getting 8-minute flights easily. Wing has no dihedral. I'm still trimming it out, need more down-thrust so haven't tried anything radical yet. Just wondering how lack of dihedral will affect agility.
Zep
I finished my 36" version made out of Dollar Tree foamboard. Put a Rimfire .10 in the nose with 3s 2200mah lipo and getting 8-minute flights easily. Wing has no dihedral. I'm still trimming it out, need more down-thrust so haven't tried anything radical yet. Just wondering how lack of dihedral will affect agility.
Zep
#110
My Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Copperas Cove, Tx.
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice story br, wish I could go back and do it all over again.
I finished my 36" version made out of Dollar Tree foamboard. Put a Rimfire .10 in the nose with 3s 2200mah lipo and getting 8-minute flights easily. Wing has no dihedral. I'm still trimming it out, need more down-thrust so haven't tried anything radical yet. Just wondering how lack of dihedral will affect agility.
Zep
I finished my 36" version made out of Dollar Tree foamboard. Put a Rimfire .10 in the nose with 3s 2200mah lipo and getting 8-minute flights easily. Wing has no dihedral. I'm still trimming it out, need more down-thrust so haven't tried anything radical yet. Just wondering how lack of dihedral will affect agility.
Zep
Wow.... Nice job on the foam board version Zep!
Did you do a build thread?
Mike
#111
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Zep
#113
It's awesome to see activity on this thread again. Nice one, Iron Butterfly! I just did a little revival work to my Corkscrew featured earlier in this thread. A little covering repair and a new servo got her going again. Here's to lots of Corkscrew flights in 2017!
#116
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Flies very well, maybe not quite as snappy as the original. Mine does have a crease in the wing, shoulda added a wood trailing edge spar. I think all said that foam is cheap and easy to use but no weight saving after adding wood reinforcement.
#117
Just giving this old goodie a bump. I've had my old Corkscrew out a couple of times so far this season and she's still flying great. I've seen a scaled down electric one recently on the boards, so Stu's design is living on.
#120
Something tells me you'd probably be covering new ground with that setup. Seems like a perfect match of engine and airframe to me. Go for it and keep us posted! Good to see this thread alive again. Some of my favorite planes are NotForSales. My Corkscrew is still going strong.
#122
Stu Richmond is now sitting on some cloud up there in modeler's heaven, looking down and smiling at everyone of you building his airplane. And blessing you for staying away from ARFs, foamies and *^$)8 drones.
A friend for many years, always lived far apart, but often found each other, like at the Tropical FunFly in Costa Rica. RIP Stu! Eloy
A friend for many years, always lived far apart, but often found each other, like at the Tropical FunFly in Costa Rica. RIP Stu! Eloy
#123
My Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Copperas Cove, Tx.
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Glad to see this thread still has some life. To answer your question... Sort of. The reason I built my Corkscrew 80 way back when was because I needed a simple airframe for a John Deer weedeater that I had absconded with the engine from. I'd converted it to airplane use and wanted to fly it in something. Unfortunately, this was way back before light weight electronic ignitions so it had the heavy magneto style ign. Also, the engine was well used and only like 13 or 16cc or something like that. So it worked but was heavy and not very powerful. But it flew the plane okay. Not a barn burner for sure but enough to do some aerobatics. The new modern, light 20cc with electronic ign would be perfect for it.
Mike