Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Results 1 to 15 of 15

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Niangua, MO
    Posts
    23
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    Just got a 40 size seamaster at a swap meet built just not covered they cut the alerons to make flaps i have never used flaps on anything so should i go with flaps or just full lenght alerons , also the plane feels pretty heavy should i go bigger than 46 power plant thanks bryon

  2. #2
    MinnFlyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Willmar, MN
    Posts
    28,519
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    A 46 is usually enough.

    I've never tried flaps on a Seamaster, but if they're already cut, I would do it in a heartbeat!
    Mike B. AMA# 42400 www.gettingairborne.com
    Ultra Sport Brotherhood #2 - Waco Brother #188 - Cub Brother #2

    \"Those are my principles. If you don’t like them, I have others.\" - Groucho Marx

  3. #3
    siddus74's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Nottingham, UNITED KINGDOM
    Posts
    1,056
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    I have one of the original ACE seamasters, mine is glassed and not particularly light, I dont think flaps are required on this bird at all - mine flys well on an OS46FX 11x7 APC. They fly like an advanced trainer anyway. Why carry any extra weight? Also you would have to cut in to the wings to make servo mounts etc, its another place for water splashs to get in and at the expected position of the flap servos is where the majority of the water is sprayed from the take off's landings and ice skating. Your choice of course.

    Siddus74
    siddus74

    http://www.leenvalleymodelflyingclub.co.uk

  4. #4
    Falcon6667's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Elberton, GA
    Posts
    301

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    The flaps are cool. If you have a programmable radio you'll need to put in a small amount of down elevator to compensate for the added lift , when you add flaps.On landing they'll work like a air brake.I have added them to several of my planes.Any good running 46 will power it fine. Ifly one with a Sati 50.An another with a St. 45...An yes they are heavy. An they fly good.
    Falcon
    Be who you are, say what you want those that mind dont matter an those that matter wont mind.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    northern, VT
    Posts
    197
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    Have a kit built Seamaster myself, flaps are not necessary, but could be fun. Try it, you might like it. I run a OS.46FX with MAS 11x6, plenty of power, remember less drag with no wheels.

  6. #6
    Chip_Mull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Granbury, TX
    Posts
    677
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    A good running 46 will be plenty of power heavy or not. As for the flaps. they are totally unnecessary. Flaps produce some lift up to 15 degrees and drag over 15 degrees. You don't need either on the Seamaster but the reduced aileron will be noticable. Cutting the Ailerons to make flaps will hinder roll performance and the increased fun factor with the flaps won't be worth it. Don't do it.
    Let\'\'s launch, first one up takes lead and we\'\'ll brief on Guard!
    Owner, F&M Enterprises

  7. #7
    MinnFlyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Willmar, MN
    Posts
    28,519
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    I disagree. The inboard ends of the ailerons do so little to the roll rate that it will never be noticed.
    Mike B. AMA# 42400 www.gettingairborne.com
    Ultra Sport Brotherhood #2 - Waco Brother #188 - Cub Brother #2

    \"Those are my principles. If you don’t like them, I have others.\" - Groucho Marx

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Niangua, MO
    Posts
    23
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    Thanks guys for all the info.

  9. #9
    SushiSeeker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Grant, FL
    Posts
    247
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    bryon,

    The extra weight of an additional servo should not even be a consideration.
    Why not have the best of both worlds; go with full-length ailerons controlled by individual servos? Then you can mix them as flaperons.
    Ultra Sport Brotherhood #48

  10. #10
    MinnFlyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Willmar, MN
    Posts
    28,519
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps


    ORIGINAL: SushiSeeker

    Why not have the best of both worlds; go with full-length ailerons controlled by individual servos? Then you can mix them as flaperons.
    Because flaperons stink!
    Mike B. AMA# 42400 www.gettingairborne.com
    Ultra Sport Brotherhood #2 - Waco Brother #188 - Cub Brother #2

    \"Those are my principles. If you don’t like them, I have others.\" - Groucho Marx

  11. #11
    SushiSeeker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Grant, FL
    Posts
    247
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    Because flaperons stink!
    Care to elaborate?
    Ultra Sport Brotherhood #48

  12. #12
    MinnFlyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Willmar, MN
    Posts
    28,519
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    Gladly

    If you were flying a straight line, flapperons work ok. Not as good as regular flaps, but ok

    But the problem with them is that you increase the chances of having a tip stall. Some wings are designed with washout where the trailing edge bends up at the wingtip. This is to prevent the tip from stalling first.

    With standard flaps, the root of the wing will stall first. But with flapperons, the tip usually stalls first - this usually happens when you're turning on to final approach because you're going slow and the inside wing is moving slower than the outside wing.

    So the inside wing (The one that is already low) tip-stalls and the plane just falls out of the sky at a low altitude with no chance of recovery.

    I lost two planes to flapperons before I found out what was causing it - Never again!
    Mike B. AMA# 42400 www.gettingairborne.com
    Ultra Sport Brotherhood #2 - Waco Brother #188 - Cub Brother #2

    \"Those are my principles. If you don’t like them, I have others.\" - Groucho Marx

  13. #13
    SushiSeeker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Grant, FL
    Posts
    247
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    Makes sense...

    So if he keeps the control surfaces separate, he can get the benefit of flaps with minimum loss of roll . Rational the being that the flaps shorten the ailerons where they are least effective and the flaps are (almost) as effective at the root of the wing as anywhere. And I was just about to add flaperons to my next plane...
    Ultra Sport Brotherhood #48

  14. #14
    MinnFlyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Willmar, MN
    Posts
    28,519
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    Flaps are actually MOST effective in the center of the wing because of the propwash
    Mike B. AMA# 42400 www.gettingairborne.com
    Ultra Sport Brotherhood #2 - Waco Brother #188 - Cub Brother #2

    \"Those are my principles. If you don’t like them, I have others.\" - Groucho Marx

  15. #15

    RE: seamaster ,with or with out flaps

    I have s a seacruiser with flap/spoiler things that don't seem to have an aeronautical name. But they are flaps that protrude up over the top surface of the wing, and while they add lift, they add drag, and mine don't cause any pitch change.

    They slow it down like dragging a sack of rocks, tho'!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Pn35581.jpg 
Views:	3 
Size:	8.4 KB 
ID:	1162146  
    Jim Casey/Seaplane Nerd
    http://www.smilesandwags.com/Floats.html


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:04 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.