Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Search:

Type: Posts; User: zippome

Page 1 of 16 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.40 seconds.

  1. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    I was looking at the Caudrin c 714, but I'm...

    I was looking at the Caudrin c 714, but I'm seeing 90 built. Hmmm mm good question.
  2. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Adrian has found the Seeker! I don't know about...

    Adrian has found the Seeker!
    I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to be in a shooting war in that!
    You're up Adrian!
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seabird_Seeker
    ...
  3. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    When an airforce needed to be rebuilt and...

    When an airforce needed to be rebuilt and refitted, just a little over 10 years ago,this was the first new aircraft procured.

    That should help a bit.
    Thanks,
    Zip.
  4. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Cruising speed is under 130 mph. Thanks, Zip

    Cruising speed is under 130 mph.
    Thanks,
    Zip
  5. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Not the alphajet, this aircraft is much, much...

    Not the alphajet, this aircraft is much, much slower.
    Thanks,
    Zip
  6. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Ok guys, here we go again.... 1. This aircraft...

    Ok guys, here we go again....

    1. This aircraft first took to the sky during the 80's.
    2. A single engine powers this aircraft thru the sky.
    3. It looks like there are 4 militaries that use...
  7. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Sorry, not the S-21 nor the s-211 .;) Ok guys,...

    Sorry, not the S-21 nor the s-211 .;)
    Ok guys, here we go again....

    1. This aircraft first took to the sky during the 80's.
    2. A single engine powers this aircraft thru the sky.
    3. It looks...
  8. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Not the Yakkity Yak! Ok guys, here we go...

    Not the Yakkity Yak!

    Ok guys, here we go again....

    1. This aircraft first took to the sky during the 80's.
    2. A single engine powers this aircraft thru the sky.
    3. It looks like there are 4...
  9. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Ok guys, here we go again.... 1. This...

    Ok guys, here we go again....

    1. This aircraft first took to the sky during the 80's.
    2. A single engine powers this aircraft thru the sky. ,
    There's a start.. it's not much I know, but at...
  10. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Actually Ernie, that was wild guess so you would...

    Actually Ernie, that was wild guess so you would toss us another clue! 😉
    OK, lemme dig something up, and I'll be back with a new quiz!
  11. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    How about the AGO C II ?

    How about the AGO C II ?
  12. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Johnny S Nails it! One of the design features...

    Johnny S Nails it!

    One of the design features is a "Double Bubble" fuselage!
    Ok, maybe that was a "STRETCH"!
    HA!
    I just kill me!


    As for the tootsie roll... 2164859
  13. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Not the mirage. BUT....... this too was born in...

    Not the mirage. BUT....... this too was born in France.
  14. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    At least one nation equipped their aircraft to...

    At least one nation equipped their aircraft to carry "special weapons". Even though that nation did not actually have any "special weapons" of their own.
  15. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Not the Tu-22, but............. They did serve...

    Not the Tu-22, but.............

    They did serve on opposing sides in a shooting conflict. Although, as it was a bit of a protracted conflict, I don't know if they served at the same time. And they...
  16. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    What we have so far.. 1. It was designed to...

    What we have so far..

    1. It was designed to fit a specification issued in the 50's.

    2. Did not fly until the 60's.

    3. 3 main versions.

    4. Only 2 versions were really used .
  17. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Nothing is ringing any bells?😶

    Nothing is ringing any bells?😶
  18. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    What we have so far.. 1. It was designed to...

    What we have so far..

    1. It was designed to fit a specification issued in the 50's.

    2. Did not fly until the 60's.

    3. 3 main versions.

    4. Only 2 versions were really used .
  19. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    What we have so far.. 1. It was designed to...

    What we have so far..

    1. It was designed to fit a specification issued in the 50's.

    2. Did not fly until the 60's.

    3. 3 main versions.

    4. Only 2 versions were really used .
  20. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    But.....Much like the Jaguar.... It was a...

    But.....Much like the Jaguar....
    It was a product of a Multi-national consortium that was formed to build this aircraft.
  21. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Neither the Harrier, nor the Jaguars....

    Neither the Harrier, nor the Jaguars. But..............
    Oh, I'll tell you later...
  22. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    ok, a more conventional clue this time.....if I...

    ok, a more conventional clue this time.....if I have to, I guess...

    1. It was designed to fit a specification issued in the 50's.

    2. Did not fly until the 60's.

    3. 3 main versions.

    4....
  23. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Too off the wall?🤔

    Too off the wall?🤔
  24. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    Thanks Ernie! (I think):D So... 1. It was...

    Thanks Ernie! (I think):D

    So...

    1. It was designed to fit a specification issued in the 50's.

    2. Did not fly until the 60's.

    3. 3 main versions.
  25. Replies
    13,237
    Views
    591,822

    So... 1. It was designed to fit a...

    So...

    1. It was designed to fit a specification issued in the 50's.

    2. Did not fly until the 60's.

    3. 3 main versions.

    4. Only 2 versions were really used .
Results 1 to 25 of 384
Page 1 of 16 1 2 3 4
RCU Reviews
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:35 AM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.