Register

If this is your first visit, please click the Sign Up now button to begin the process of creating your account so you can begin posting on our forums! The Sign Up process will only take up about a minute of two of your time.

Results 1 to 6 of 6

  1. #1
    DELTAFLY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    CAPITAL FEDERAL, , ARGENTINA
    Posts
    68
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback

    Super Sportster 60 engine choice

    Hello,
    I'll start building a kit of the Great Planes Super Sportster 60.
    I have several engines to use in this plane but I have not decided yet.
    The engines are: OS .61FX, OS FS.70 Surpass, OS FS.90, Super Tigre .61ABC (Made in Italy) and Rossi .45ABC "unused".
    I would like to know your opinions in order to reach a decision.

    Best Regards,
    Norberto
    Norberto StΓ‘bile
    www.deltafly.com.ar

  2. #2
    TomCrump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Traverse City, MI
    Posts
    5,560
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    I have a .91 Surpass in my Sportster. They make a great combination.

    Your .45 is prbably too small, and definately too light. The Sportsters build tail heavy, so you want spme weight up front. It would be great in the 40 size.

    The .70 Surpass is a wonderful power plant...........for the 40 sized Sportster. Again, I thik it's too small for the 60 sized version. I had a 70 Surpass in my 40 Sportster. It was the best flying of all my Sportsters.

    If your .61s are dependable, they'll be fine. Be prepared to add nose weight.

    The FS 90 would be my choice. Don't follow the instructions where they tell you to move the firewall rearward. Build it as is, and lengthen the nose. You may get by without nose weight, if you do.
    Tom C

    Sig Brotherhood # 120

  3. #3
    DELTAFLY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    CAPITAL FEDERAL, , ARGENTINA
    Posts
    68
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Hello Tom. Thanks for your answer!
    The elevator included en el kit is very heavy. I planned to buil it in structure to loose weight in the tail.

    Norberto
    Norberto StΓ‘bile
    www.deltafly.com.ar

  4. #4
    TomCrump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Traverse City, MI
    Posts
    5,560
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    Anything that you can do, without weakening the fuselage structure, should be considered.
    Tom C

    Sig Brotherhood # 120

  5. #5
    Charlie P.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Port Crane, NY
    Posts
    4,913
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    I have an older 70 II Surpass in a Contender 60 and it is a beautiful match. My Super Sportster is the giant variety with a 34cc Fuji, but I would bet the 60 size with a 70 Surpass would be a sweet flier. I like flying my Super Sportster at a crawl (1/3 throttle) and it does very well. It's not a fast airframe anyway, and 3-D is out of the question.

    On the other hand . . . I have had great fun with a Super Tigre .51 in .40 size airframes. The ST.61 would get you more speed.

    Either would be a good choice!
    Last edited by Charlie P.; 05-27-2014 at 08:24 PM.
    Charlie P. (NY) "Gravity is weak but persistant".

    AMA 747089/IMAA 30723

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Leander, TX
    Posts
    6,144
    Gallery
    My Gallery
    Models
    My Models
    Ratings
    My Feedback
    My SS60 is about 13 years old. It had an OS .61 fx at first, wore that engine out then put a ST .75 in. Turned it into a screamin demon. Tons of fun.
    edwin


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:04 PM.

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.