Funtana 90
03-17-2005, 08:30 PM
#1
Funtana 90
Well you might say what does a 3D plane like a Funtana 90 have to do with sport flying? It's like this. The local hobby shop had it on sale for $199.00. It's a 69.5" W.S. so it's a nice size, and has a 2 piece wing for easy transport in my 4 door Ford Concour. That darn car has less room in it because nothing folds down than did my much smaller Ford Aspire. So in essence the Funtana is cheap, good looking and should be a whole lot of fun. I'm not interest in heavy 3D, just sport flying.
To power it I've purchased a Magnum 90XL 4 stroke for $150.00 on sale now at Hobby People. I like Hitec products so I've purchased 4 Hitec HS-5625 MG digital servos. I'll run a 425 on the throttle. I've read here on RCU that most of these planes come out tail heavy. So I'm going to use 2 Sullivan #584 Carbon Fiber reinforced precision control rods running to each side of the elevators. I'll join these with a flat plate of aluminum having 3 closely spaced tapped 4-40 holes. The center of which I'll use another small section of carbon reinforced control rod going to a wheel on the elevator servo mounted under the wing.
I fly with a Futaba 6XAS which does not have the capability for separate elevator halves and I couldn't justify the expense of two servos mounted in the tail, especially since no one in my club has the Hitec Servo Programmer. If it balances @ 6-1/4" I'll leave well enough alone if not I'll put the rudder servo under the wing also and use a pull - pull on the rudder.
What do you guys think? As far as control throws I was thinking I'd intially use the recommended low throws as my high and use 50% of that for my low.
I'd welcome any comments.
John
To power it I've purchased a Magnum 90XL 4 stroke for $150.00 on sale now at Hobby People. I like Hitec products so I've purchased 4 Hitec HS-5625 MG digital servos. I'll run a 425 on the throttle. I've read here on RCU that most of these planes come out tail heavy. So I'm going to use 2 Sullivan #584 Carbon Fiber reinforced precision control rods running to each side of the elevators. I'll join these with a flat plate of aluminum having 3 closely spaced tapped 4-40 holes. The center of which I'll use another small section of carbon reinforced control rod going to a wheel on the elevator servo mounted under the wing.
I fly with a Futaba 6XAS which does not have the capability for separate elevator halves and I couldn't justify the expense of two servos mounted in the tail, especially since no one in my club has the Hitec Servo Programmer. If it balances @ 6-1/4" I'll leave well enough alone if not I'll put the rudder servo under the wing also and use a pull - pull on the rudder.
What do you guys think? As far as control throws I was thinking I'd intially use the recommended low throws as my high and use 50% of that for my low.
I'd welcome any comments.
John
03-17-2005, 08:39 PM
#2
My Feedback: (551)
RE: Funtana 90
You may have gone a little overboard on the servos, but it should be a really nice sport plane. Be careful of speed though. 3D airplanes are made to fly sloooow. If you go too fast the control surfaces will flutter and you may lose the airplane.
Jim
Jim
03-17-2005, 08:55 PM
#3
RE: Funtana 90
jrf,
Concern about flutter is why I went overboard on the servos. I wanted quick and rigid so I spent money on digitals. I plan on sealing all the gaps and using Robart heavy duty horns making everything as slop free as possible. If I limit the throws do you think I'll still have a problem with flutter?
John
Concern about flutter is why I went overboard on the servos. I wanted quick and rigid so I spent money on digitals. I plan on sealing all the gaps and using Robart heavy duty horns making everything as slop free as possible. If I limit the throws do you think I'll still have a problem with flutter?
John
03-17-2005, 09:20 PM
#4
My Feedback: (551)
RE: Funtana 90
John:
Flutter is caused by speed. Every airplane will flutter if you go fast enough. 3D airplanes have a low flutter speed because of the large unbalanced control surfaces. Rigid controls and strong servos just transfer the flutter forces to the servo mounts. The faster you go, the stronger the forces will be. The early Funtana 90's had weak aileron servo mounts and many of them self destructed in flight because the servo mounts pulled out of the wing. (If your Funtana has sheeting around the aileron servos, you have the later "improved" version.)
Having said that, you should be OK with that 91 using an 6 pitch prop if you throttle back on the downlines. I wouldn't use an 8 pitch. Be sure and connect all pushrods to the control horn hole farthest from the control surface. That gives the best mechanical leverage and minimizes slop in the control surface at neutral.
Jim
Flutter is caused by speed. Every airplane will flutter if you go fast enough. 3D airplanes have a low flutter speed because of the large unbalanced control surfaces. Rigid controls and strong servos just transfer the flutter forces to the servo mounts. The faster you go, the stronger the forces will be. The early Funtana 90's had weak aileron servo mounts and many of them self destructed in flight because the servo mounts pulled out of the wing. (If your Funtana has sheeting around the aileron servos, you have the later "improved" version.)
Having said that, you should be OK with that 91 using an 6 pitch prop if you throttle back on the downlines. I wouldn't use an 8 pitch. Be sure and connect all pushrods to the control horn hole farthest from the control surface. That gives the best mechanical leverage and minimizes slop in the control surface at neutral.
Jim
03-18-2005, 05:48 AM
#5
RE: Funtana 90
Jim,
Ok, I'll watch the speed on the downlines.
I'm thinking of using a 14 X 6 prop so that should fit in well with your recommendation.
I've read everything I could on the cause of flutter and am still confused, except to keep everything tight - free of slop. Your explanation of the stress transferring makes sense.
I'll take the wings out and look at them to see what version they are. The plane should be pretty new as my hobby shop has sold 4 of these this past year.
It was really a spur of the moment purchase. I probably should have bought a stick - but it sure looks pretty. I still have to finish my Hog Bipe, put together another Venus 40 and then I'll get to the Funtana.
John
Ok, I'll watch the speed on the downlines.
I'm thinking of using a 14 X 6 prop so that should fit in well with your recommendation.I've read everything I could on the cause of flutter and am still confused, except to keep everything tight - free of slop. Your explanation of the stress transferring makes sense.
I'll take the wings out and look at them to see what version they are. The plane should be pretty new as my hobby shop has sold 4 of these this past year.
It was really a spur of the moment purchase. I probably should have bought a stick - but it sure looks pretty. I still have to finish my Hog Bipe, put together another Venus 40 and then I'll get to the Funtana.
John
03-18-2005, 09:33 AM
#6
Senior Member
My Feedback: (13)
RE: Funtana 90
You won't be sorry, John; this is a great model, and flies better than ANY stick ever made.
There are five of these at my field now. IMO, it is one of the best values to be had in an ARF. My buddy has an OS 1.08 in his, and its a great combo. But heed jrf's warning. This plane definitely flies on the wing, and high speeds should be avoided.
You will be amazed at just how slow it will fly, especially with a rearward CG. But be careful there; you can get it too far back before you know it...
There are five of these at my field now. IMO, it is one of the best values to be had in an ARF. My buddy has an OS 1.08 in his, and its a great combo. But heed jrf's warning. This plane definitely flies on the wing, and high speeds should be avoided.
You will be amazed at just how slow it will fly, especially with a rearward CG. But be careful there; you can get it too far back before you know it...
03-18-2005, 10:28 AM
#7
RE: Funtana 90
I would strongly recommend that you set the CG about an inch forward of the recommended 7 1/8". That setting is for extreme 3-D and you will find it difficult to fly if you plan on Sport Flying with it.
Since you don't want to go with two Elev servos, I would suggest putting both rudder and Elev servos in the radio compartment with a forked pushrod for the Elev and either a push rod or pull-pull for the rudder (whichever you prefer). This will take a lot of weight out of the tail to help you get that CG forward.
And again, flying these things fast is a no-no! - But it is one SWEET airplane!
Since you don't want to go with two Elev servos, I would suggest putting both rudder and Elev servos in the radio compartment with a forked pushrod for the Elev and either a push rod or pull-pull for the rudder (whichever you prefer). This will take a lot of weight out of the tail to help you get that CG forward.
And again, flying these things fast is a no-no! - But it is one SWEET airplane!
03-18-2005, 12:24 PM
#8
RE: Funtana 90
Sounds great Steve, I hope I like it as well as my Stick, cause I really like that Stick a bunch. I'll keep an eye on the speed.
Minn - I'd planned on having the CG at 6 1/4". I was going to use two separate control pushrods joined in the front to a tapped aluminum plate and then to the servo. Do you have a source for the forked pushrod, or were you thinking of making one up from something like an arrowshaft with (2) 4-40 wires wyed off the end?
I gotta finish the stuff on my bench. I definitely want to fly the Funtana this spring! You guys are making me think I made a good choice.
John
Minn - I'd planned on having the CG at 6 1/4". I was going to use two separate control pushrods joined in the front to a tapped aluminum plate and then to the servo. Do you have a source for the forked pushrod, or were you thinking of making one up from something like an arrowshaft with (2) 4-40 wires wyed off the end?
I gotta finish the stuff on my bench. I definitely want to fly the Funtana this spring! You guys are making me think I made a good choice.
John
03-18-2005, 02:59 PM
#10
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Temecula,
CA
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Funtana 90
JNorton,
Glad to see another F90 lover. You will rock with the servo selections, just keep those linkages TIGHT and with maximum mechanical advantage your control horns will allow. Echoing everyone else... SLOW is this birds world.
Your engine selection is pretty weak, no offense. If you really don't want 3D, you'll be fine. But, this is one canary that loves to 3D. I'm a pattern guy too, novice learning 3D. The thing is, when you have a bird that can go berserk, you will want to go berserk too. The recommended Saito 100 is marginal for agressive 3D, so your Magnum selection will leave you way short. Just a suggestion... think about growth and your ever improving skills.
The CG you are targeting is not happening. 6-1/4 with a light motor like this will require many oz's in the nose to get there. You will find a VERY docile flying creature with CG at 6-3/4"... greasy landings and no funky tail-heavy tendencies in the air. Even with pull-pull on the Rudder, and Y-link on the elevator in the fuse, you are still well behind the 7-1/4" factory CG, which is recommended for strong 3D performance. My "guess" is, you will CG at 7-1/2 or more with your setup plan. A heavier motor (with more power) can fix this better than adding lead. I hope I'm wrong... but don't be suprised. Adding balancing lead to an underpowered plane is not happiness.
Control Throws: I am really happy with low rates at 1" on both Aileron and Elevator, 2" on Rudder. This is actually a little touchy, and I used 40% expo to soften it up a bit. High rates are whatever you can get with good mechanical advantage, but these low-rate settings allow some pretty radical stuff! This thing has WAY more control than you need for good pattern flying.
It is a beauty... and a MAJOR BLAST to fly. I'm new to this too, and totally addicted now. You will not be dissappointed.
Glad to see another F90 lover. You will rock with the servo selections, just keep those linkages TIGHT and with maximum mechanical advantage your control horns will allow. Echoing everyone else... SLOW is this birds world.
Your engine selection is pretty weak, no offense. If you really don't want 3D, you'll be fine. But, this is one canary that loves to 3D. I'm a pattern guy too, novice learning 3D. The thing is, when you have a bird that can go berserk, you will want to go berserk too. The recommended Saito 100 is marginal for agressive 3D, so your Magnum selection will leave you way short. Just a suggestion... think about growth and your ever improving skills.
The CG you are targeting is not happening. 6-1/4 with a light motor like this will require many oz's in the nose to get there. You will find a VERY docile flying creature with CG at 6-3/4"... greasy landings and no funky tail-heavy tendencies in the air. Even with pull-pull on the Rudder, and Y-link on the elevator in the fuse, you are still well behind the 7-1/4" factory CG, which is recommended for strong 3D performance. My "guess" is, you will CG at 7-1/2 or more with your setup plan. A heavier motor (with more power) can fix this better than adding lead. I hope I'm wrong... but don't be suprised. Adding balancing lead to an underpowered plane is not happiness.
Control Throws: I am really happy with low rates at 1" on both Aileron and Elevator, 2" on Rudder. This is actually a little touchy, and I used 40% expo to soften it up a bit. High rates are whatever you can get with good mechanical advantage, but these low-rate settings allow some pretty radical stuff! This thing has WAY more control than you need for good pattern flying.
It is a beauty... and a MAJOR BLAST to fly. I'm new to this too, and totally addicted now. You will not be dissappointed.
03-18-2005, 04:14 PM
#11
Senior Member
My Feedback: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Coventry , RI
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Funtana 90
Wow probably the best thread I have read in here with advise to a new F 90 customer. All of the people in here that gave advise I have read their posts in other threads reguarding different subjects on the same plane. All I can say is its all excellent advise. I too have a F 90 but there is no more to say about it except HAVE FUN!!
03-18-2005, 04:15 PM
#12
RE: Funtana 90
TMan,
Yup, no offense taken. How do I put this. I'm just not that interested in 3D. It doesn't make my blood boil. Now give me two wheels and 140 HP and I'll get a great big grin - bikes do it but cars have always left me flat. I've got decent hand to eye coordination but my reflexes suck. As Clint Eastwood said - we all have to know our own limitations. Or sumthin like that!
Thank you for your control recomendations I'll be using them as my high rates. If the balance is indeed that far back with no servos in the tail I'll be surprised. I can always take the 120 Enya off my Stick if worse comes to worse. This years budget for planes is pretty well blown, got hit with some unexpected expenses.
I'm happy you are having so much fun with your plane flying it your way. I'll expect to be having just as much fun flying it my way. Different strokes.
John
Your engine selection is pretty weak, no offense. If you really don't want 3D, you'll be fine.
Thank you for your control recomendations I'll be using them as my high rates. If the balance is indeed that far back with no servos in the tail I'll be surprised. I can always take the 120 Enya off my Stick if worse comes to worse. This years budget for planes is pretty well blown, got hit with some unexpected expenses.
I'm happy you are having so much fun with your plane flying it your way. I'll expect to be having just as much fun flying it my way. Different strokes.
John
03-18-2005, 05:29 PM
#13
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Temecula,
CA
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Funtana 90
Yea, there is just a sense of pleasure to fly around, with an occasional roll or hammerhead. I am not "jazzed" about 3D either, but I am learning anyway. My son is the 3D maniac, amd we share the planes we fly. I like the challenge, but I really want to become "proficient" with IMAC pattern flight more than 3D.
The throws I use on low rates: this thing flies like a trainer the way I set it up. It is too easy, but I enjoy it like this. Just a note though, don't cut your low rates down too far from there... I would hate to see you get in trouble and come up short on control. I wouldn't set low rates any less that 70% of the low rates I use. Lots of expo really makes it nice feeling though, so you might compensate there.
This bird is REAL pitch sensitive, so just watch for that on your first takeoff. I was rolling in throttle real slow on my first takeoff, expecting it to lift off early and kept pulling back more and more waiting, then whammo... she jumped up and went nearly verticle. Scared the crap out of me. Lucky I have tons of power to pull out (Saito 150). It surely would have stalled and rolled over without it. Now, I roll in power and pull back just a touch and wait... it picks up so nice and easy. Just took a little getting used to.
The throws I use on low rates: this thing flies like a trainer the way I set it up. It is too easy, but I enjoy it like this. Just a note though, don't cut your low rates down too far from there... I would hate to see you get in trouble and come up short on control. I wouldn't set low rates any less that 70% of the low rates I use. Lots of expo really makes it nice feeling though, so you might compensate there.
This bird is REAL pitch sensitive, so just watch for that on your first takeoff. I was rolling in throttle real slow on my first takeoff, expecting it to lift off early and kept pulling back more and more waiting, then whammo... she jumped up and went nearly verticle. Scared the crap out of me. Lucky I have tons of power to pull out (Saito 150). It surely would have stalled and rolled over without it. Now, I roll in power and pull back just a touch and wait... it picks up so nice and easy. Just took a little getting used to.
03-18-2005, 07:26 PM
#14
RE: Funtana 90
TMan,
That's my definition of sport flying! Although I do more than the occasional roll. 
It's fun.
I've been teaching my son to fly. We were out at the field 3 times last year. On the final outing he had three sucessful take offs and landings. I was still on the box but never took control. Boy were we jazzed. I'd love to fly regularly with him but he lives about 40 miles SE from me. The field is another another 40 miles North from my house. So he spends 160 miles driving to go flying with me. We are looking to see if we can find a field a little more centrally located.
I'll take your advice and watch for the plane being pitch sensitive. I wonder how much of that is caused by the CG being set back for 3D flying?
John
Yea, there is just a sense of pleasure to fly around, with an occasional roll or hammerhead.
It's fun.
My son is the 3D maniac, and we share the planes we fly.
I'll take your advice and watch for the plane being pitch sensitive. I wonder how much of that is caused by the CG being set back for 3D flying?
John
03-20-2005, 01:12 PM
#15
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Temecula,
CA
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Funtana 90
Well, me too. I am not just a circle flier. Working slowly at more and more stunts. It's amazing how hard it can be to execute simple stunts like a slow four-point-roll when you really try to keep a straight track and level line. Finally got KE dialed in pretty well.
Flying with your son is just the best thing in life. Such an awesome bonding experience when you both have so much passion for a common thing like this. It gives you deep pride to see your boy enjoying something so much. I know how it is being remote like that, but we make time. I can see myself flying old war birds with him 30 years from now.
I don't think the pitch thing is because of 3D CG point. I'm at 6-3/4"... that's quite forward from factory spec. The 3D guys are back at 7-1/2" or more. This thing has tons of elevator surface off the main wing line. It just works real well.
Flying with your son is just the best thing in life. Such an awesome bonding experience when you both have so much passion for a common thing like this. It gives you deep pride to see your boy enjoying something so much. I know how it is being remote like that, but we make time. I can see myself flying old war birds with him 30 years from now
.I don't think the pitch thing is because of 3D CG point. I'm at 6-3/4"... that's quite forward from factory spec. The 3D guys are back at 7-1/2" or more. This thing has tons of elevator surface off the main wing line. It just works real well.
03-24-2005, 11:42 AM
#16
Senior Member
My Feedback: (23)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Funtana 90
John, you might want to try an APC 14x4W or 15x4W. They are specifically designed for 3Ders like the F90. I think even a 6 pitch prop can get going a bit too fast at WOT. I just bought a Magnum .91 4stroke too. Tower has them for $150 before discounts.
Good tip about the updated F90 with the reinforced aileron servo mount. I bought an F90 when they first came out and sold it after hearing of all the crash stories. I still think most failures were due to improper setup and flying style, but didn't want to take the risk anyway. Now I might think about buying an updated one. I am usually a 2stroke flyer, but this is one bird that just begs for a lightweight 4stroke torquer.
Good tip about the updated F90 with the reinforced aileron servo mount. I bought an F90 when they first came out and sold it after hearing of all the crash stories. I still think most failures were due to improper setup and flying style, but didn't want to take the risk anyway. Now I might think about buying an updated one. I am usually a 2stroke flyer, but this is one bird that just begs for a lightweight 4stroke torquer.
03-24-2005, 11:59 AM
#17
RE: Funtana 90
Volfy,
Everyone says they are coming out tail heavy. By putting the servos under the wing I'm hoping everything balances with no added weight. I'm trying to keep it really light.
Over in the ARF section everyone is thinking that a 120 4 stroke is too small. I really think that the 90 will work just fine for me as I have no plans on torque rolling it, on the other hand - tail slides, flat spins, snaps, rolls, knife edges, inverted, waterfalls etc. should be just fine.
John
Everyone says they are coming out tail heavy. By putting the servos under the wing I'm hoping everything balances with no added weight. I'm trying to keep it really light.
Over in the ARF section everyone is thinking that a 120 4 stroke is too small. I really think that the 90 will work just fine for me as I have no plans on torque rolling it, on the other hand - tail slides, flat spins, snaps, rolls, knife edges, inverted, waterfalls etc. should be just fine.
John
03-24-2005, 02:05 PM
#18
Senior Member
My Feedback: (23)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Funtana 90
John, I think this is precise why this Sport Flying forum was created in the first place. Here, we might have a chance for some sane engine recommendations without folks getting into pissing contests of who can stuff the biggest and baddest motor in the plane. The Magnum .91FS will help keep the F90 super light (as it was originally intended) abd should do just fine for you. Personally, I think Saito 1.00 is the absolute largest I would go on the F90, but it costs twice as much as the Magnum .91FS.
03-24-2005, 02:05 PM
#19
Senior Member
My Feedback: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Temecula,
CA
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Funtana 90
John,
I am thinking you will be okay. The Saito 100 guys are adding a few (2-5) oz's to the nose with the pull-pull and battery on the motor box. The Saito 100 (19 oz) is a bit lighter than the Magnum 91 (23 oz), both I believe without muffler. It will be close, but you might get lucky. If you put your throttle servo under the cowl, and put the batteries on a pylon hanging out under the motor, you will be golden somewhere forward of the 7-1/4" point without lead...
Volfy's prop recommendations are perfect. I hope you won't be dissapointed. Again, every 1/4" you can get forward of the spec CG, the better she flies pattern. It is concensus that the 7-1/4" CG is recommended for "good" 3D performance. There are some flying at 6-1/4 that say it's solid like a tank, easy to land, but not too good for 3D.
I am thinking you will be okay. The Saito 100 guys are adding a few (2-5) oz's to the nose with the pull-pull and battery on the motor box. The Saito 100 (19 oz) is a bit lighter than the Magnum 91 (23 oz), both I believe without muffler. It will be close, but you might get lucky. If you put your throttle servo under the cowl, and put the batteries on a pylon hanging out under the motor, you will be golden somewhere forward of the 7-1/4" point without lead...
Volfy's prop recommendations are perfect. I hope you won't be dissapointed. Again, every 1/4" you can get forward of the spec CG, the better she flies pattern. It is concensus that the 7-1/4" CG is recommended for "good" 3D performance. There are some flying at 6-1/4 that say it's solid like a tank, easy to land, but not too good for 3D.
03-25-2005, 09:15 AM
#20
RE: Funtana 90
John,
FYI...
With that engine I would use a 15X4 prop
I had a very similiar setup on my F90. I originally had an OS91FS turning a 15X4 APC and it would 3D nice, but not wild. I used Hitech 5645's all around and also did the pull-pull plus stuffed my 2400 6.0V Sub-C battery next to the fuel tank and I came out at 6 3/4 inches for the CG.
As far as I am concerned, this is a good CG as inverted flight is hands off and landing is basically hands off once you have the sink rate setup.
The OS91/15X4 combo would hover it at very nearly full throttle and would have absolutely no power in reserve for emegencies. Other than that 3D was fine, lacking but fine. It also helped keep the speed down as speed on this plane kills quickly.
I then switched to an OS120 pumped turning a 16X4W APC and moved the rudder servo to the rear and ended up at 6 3/4 inches again and it made a nice difference.
Since I have gotten used to the plane and my 3D skills have somewhat improved I wanted more so I found a used YS110 put a 16X6 APC on it and screwed it onto the front, leaving the battery next to the tank and going back to pull-pull and I still balance at 6 3/4 and now I have plenty of reserve power.
Seal the hinges, make sure that you have great mechanical advantage and verify that no ribs are cracked in the wings and go have a blast. Also be sure to use the C/F rods they provide to strengthen the tail.
The plane is very nice and flies 3D well. As far as checking the wings, all I did was turn it over so I could look through the blue transparent covering and grabbed the root and the wing tips and gave it a twist. On my left wing it was a strong as could be, but on my right wing, just a very small twisting force crushed the tip and I saw every rib open up due to cracks. H9 was nice enough to send me the covering so I stripped all the blue off, sandwitched every rib with 1/16 balsa and a thin coat of epoxy and now I have a wings that is very strong.
I have over 75 very hard flights on mine now and it's my favorite plane for taking to the field and tearing up the sky with. I use my 4*60 for general sport flying which has the 91 on it from the F90.
One other thing I needed to do was to add 1 washer on each of the lower engine mounts. If I cut throttle quickly the plane would balloon up pretty quickly. Adding up thrust took that away quite nicely.
FYI...
With that engine I would use a 15X4 prop
I had a very similiar setup on my F90. I originally had an OS91FS turning a 15X4 APC and it would 3D nice, but not wild. I used Hitech 5645's all around and also did the pull-pull plus stuffed my 2400 6.0V Sub-C battery next to the fuel tank and I came out at 6 3/4 inches for the CG.
As far as I am concerned, this is a good CG as inverted flight is hands off and landing is basically hands off once you have the sink rate setup.
The OS91/15X4 combo would hover it at very nearly full throttle and would have absolutely no power in reserve for emegencies. Other than that 3D was fine, lacking but fine. It also helped keep the speed down as speed on this plane kills quickly.
I then switched to an OS120 pumped turning a 16X4W APC and moved the rudder servo to the rear and ended up at 6 3/4 inches again and it made a nice difference.
Since I have gotten used to the plane and my 3D skills have somewhat improved I wanted more so I found a used YS110 put a 16X6 APC on it and screwed it onto the front, leaving the battery next to the tank and going back to pull-pull and I still balance at 6 3/4 and now I have plenty of reserve power.
Seal the hinges, make sure that you have great mechanical advantage and verify that no ribs are cracked in the wings and go have a blast. Also be sure to use the C/F rods they provide to strengthen the tail.
The plane is very nice and flies 3D well. As far as checking the wings, all I did was turn it over so I could look through the blue transparent covering and grabbed the root and the wing tips and gave it a twist. On my left wing it was a strong as could be, but on my right wing, just a very small twisting force crushed the tip and I saw every rib open up due to cracks. H9 was nice enough to send me the covering so I stripped all the blue off, sandwitched every rib with 1/16 balsa and a thin coat of epoxy and now I have a wings that is very strong.
I have over 75 very hard flights on mine now and it's my favorite plane for taking to the field and tearing up the sky with. I use my 4*60 for general sport flying which has the 91 on it from the F90.
One other thing I needed to do was to add 1 washer on each of the lower engine mounts. If I cut throttle quickly the plane would balloon up pretty quickly. Adding up thrust took that away quite nicely.
03-25-2005, 11:38 AM
#21
RE: Funtana 90
bubbagates,
Good information. Last night I went down in the basement with full intentions of finishing my Venus 40 so I can start on the Funtana.
Dumb #1 Had extra epoxy left over from fiberglassing the wings so instead of tossing it I put it in the belly pan to fuel proof it.
Dumb #2 The belly pan warped after 4 hours.
Dumb #3 Put in a weight to straighten it out and left it.
Dumb #4 Found out the weight is now glued into the belly pan.
Dumb #5 Twisted the weight out and broke off a small section of balsa sheeting. Scraped the section off from the weight.
Dumb #6 Attempt to glue the section (3/8" dia) back onto the belly pan. Now I've been using Titebond because I have a severe reaction to CA. But this is just a small piece - no problem. Wrong. The tip was plugged and instead of unplugging it I just squeezed a little harder.
Dumb #7 Now that my wedding band is glued to my left hand and my finger tips are glued to the belly pan, I twist and my finger tip skin is left on the belly pan!
Got the acetone out. Got my ring free of my finger. Got the CA residue off the monokote. Polished it with a cotton rag. It still looks pretty good, although there is a small dimple where the piece came off. Any way called it a night. Went upstairs made got a shot and coke, and spent the next couple of hours peeling dried CA off my fingers.
I'll try finishing the Venus tonight. I really want to start on the Funtana.
John.
Good information. Last night I went down in the basement with full intentions of finishing my Venus 40 so I can start on the Funtana.
Dumb #1 Had extra epoxy left over from fiberglassing the wings so instead of tossing it I put it in the belly pan to fuel proof it.
Dumb #2 The belly pan warped after 4 hours.
Dumb #3 Put in a weight to straighten it out and left it.
Dumb #4 Found out the weight is now glued into the belly pan.
Dumb #5 Twisted the weight out and broke off a small section of balsa sheeting. Scraped the section off from the weight.
Dumb #6 Attempt to glue the section (3/8" dia) back onto the belly pan. Now I've been using Titebond because I have a severe reaction to CA. But this is just a small piece - no problem. Wrong. The tip was plugged and instead of unplugging it I just squeezed a little harder.
Dumb #7 Now that my wedding band is glued to my left hand and my finger tips are glued to the belly pan, I twist and my finger tip skin is left on the belly pan!
Got the acetone out. Got my ring free of my finger. Got the CA residue off the monokote. Polished it with a cotton rag. It still looks pretty good, although there is a small dimple where the piece came off. Any way called it a night. Went upstairs made got a shot and coke, and spent the next couple of hours peeling dried CA off my fingers.
I'll try finishing the Venus tonight. I really want to start on the Funtana.
John.
03-25-2005, 07:09 PM
#23
Senior Member
My Feedback: (75)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Aurora,
CO
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RE: Funtana 90
ORIGINAL: jrf
Funny story!
I'm sure we've all done something similar. Why doesn't someone start a thread called "Only a Sport Flyer..."
I'd tell you about the time I CA'd my finger into my ear, but I'm still too embarrassed.
Jim
Funny story!
I'm sure we've all done something similar. Why doesn't someone start a thread called "Only a Sport Flyer..."
I'd tell you about the time I CA'd my finger into my ear, but I'm still too embarrassed.
Jim
At least it was your ear and not the trip to the bathroom
Joe
