Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > Sport Flying
Reload this Page >

Ultra sport too heavy?

Community
Search
Notices
Sport Flying This forum is for those that like to fly just for the enjoyment of flying, and all the airplanes that help them. Discuss here the joys of flying and the airplanes that help you enjoy it.

Ultra sport too heavy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-25-2006, 09:14 AM
  #26  
Bernard
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: schaumburg, IL
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Ultra sport too heavy?

I am building an Ultra Sport 40 now with Dave Brown retracts and would love to see how you set up the servos for the ailerons and retracts. I am guessing you have 2 servos hooked to the torque rods for the ailerons rather than putting them in the wing - otherwise you could not do flaperons. Any pictures you have of the set up would be helpful.
Old 11-11-2006, 10:33 PM
  #27  
iflircaircraft
 
iflircaircraft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Grovetown, GA
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Ultra sport too heavy?

Just wondering if I put my MVVS 45 with a tuned pipe on my old US40.....should be fast!! huh I loved flying mine until I had engine problems. I even rebuilt the fuse after a battery failure.
BTW..build up the landing gear blocks as they tend to break out of the wing.

Happy Flying


Tom
Old 11-12-2006, 02:25 AM
  #28  
Rod Bender
 
Rod Bender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Ultra sport too heavy?

I put a Super Tigre G51 in my Ultra Sport 40, and it kicks. Very fast, super fun plane to fly .... Greg
Old 12-28-2006, 03:40 PM
  #29  
Robbidos
My Feedback: (20)
 
Robbidos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: GLENDALE, AZ
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Ultra sport too heavy?

I love my UltraSport 1000 (I've love all the US's). It has a Saito 1.5GK and air retracts. I also customized the tail feathers (larger control surfaces) for better handling. Lots of fun to fly.
Old 01-02-2007, 05:47 PM
  #30  
Bernard
Senior Member
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: schaumburg, IL
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default RE: Ultra sport too heavy?

How is the Super tiger vs. the OS? I am torn between a ST 51 and an OS 55 that just came out. I know people have commented about the Super Tiger being a hard engine to tune but I have 2 planes I need to buy engines and flight packs for and don't have the cash to be loyal to OS. I have some OS and Thunder Tiger 40 size motors and they are both great but when I need both a 40 and 90 size it is hard to justify the cost.
Old 01-02-2007, 07:10 PM
  #31  
jrf
My Feedback: (551)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default RE: Ultra sport too heavy?

Generalizing like crazy here, but in the two stroke area, OS is the best and Super Tiger is the worst. That pretty much explains the difference in price. In between those extremes, you will find Thunder Tiger (very good, very consistant) and all of the Chinese engines (GMS, ASP, Evolution, Magnum, etc.) (usually good, but you occasionally get a bad one).

Now, un-generalizing a bit, the OS 91FX is not one of their best, but the Thunder Tiger 91 two stroke is well thought of. If I were looking for a 40 size two stroke and a 90 size two stroke, I would go with an OS 46/55 and a TT 91. If I wanted more power and the airplane could stand the extra weight, I would probably go with a GMS 1.20 for the bigger one.

Jim
Old 01-05-2007, 01:51 PM
  #32  
KC36330
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default RE: Ultra sport too heavy?


ORIGINAL: airborn900

100Mph is not unlikely.....................
back in the mid 90's when i got this 40 ARF i put a .36 Heli engine and Heli pipe on it, it didn't have 'out of the hole' power but clocked 97 with gear up. i put a .90 4 banger on it and kept the speed and added a ton of power with vertical acceleration, now it's got a Jett 90 LX on it (had to mount it upright, that's the only way i could clear the pipe), it'll easily break 100 mph in a vertical climb.

kc
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Lj22733.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	50.2 KB
ID:	591345  
Old 01-19-2007, 05:45 PM
  #33  
paladin
My Feedback: (9)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vestal, NY
Posts: 2,921
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default RE: Ultra sport too heavy?

Just thought I would chim in. My US60 weights 6.75# and has been gunned at 94mph with a Good Super Tigre S-61K. It is turningan APC 12x9 turning 10k and at 91db. This airplane is one of the first US kits they made, with over 140hr of flight time. The engine is a round head Super Tigre, who knows what decade that makes the engine. I don't have any pic's of mine, something about holding the camera and flying!? but hear is the son's

Joe
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Jh17241.jpg
Views:	21
Size:	66.7 KB
ID:	601791   Click image for larger version

Name:	Ok28831.jpg
Views:	17
Size:	60.5 KB
ID:	601792   Click image for larger version

Name:	Mg97123.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	34.4 KB
ID:	601793  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.