some of these points were made but you seem to be changing the setup to suite a landing profile, which will effect the rest of the flight profile, without it appears at some of the comments to change your approach and landing method. Many have done so so its not an issue with needing to change much with the plane.

Consider. Prop with lower pitch.... good idea and the 60 let alone a bored 60 will turn a low pitch prop to have better thrust control, but thrust is thrust. Unless you can't get the idle down enough you should be able to throttle back to have the same effect of using a lower pitched prop.

If this is all still an issue then the comments about approach should be considered because even the clipped winged cub still have a very low wing load. This like most trainers need to be flown to the ground meaning they have extra lift. A controlled powered approach even with such still means you go to a reduced power setting, use your pitch control to set just below level flight, and feather altitude with the last of your throttle control. If the lift is still too great it may just need more negative pitch input but as you arrive over the field you should be able to throttle to idle and flair just as you are about to touch down.

I fly EDFs mainly and this gets very important to land under power and under a controlled "Stable Approach" so that you're not replacing landing gear more than you need to. Check the FAA and Stable Approach. Its actually how FS pilots are taught to land also.