Originally Posted by
mongo
as a leader member, i found his electioneering in an official email to be quite wrong.
should have sent out a separate email for that, he he really felt the need to state it.
of, course, it is no more or less than i have come to expect from rusty, so far in his tenure.
and, yes, that first response email did read as ridicule, at least to this old TEXAN.
Originally Posted by
littlecrankshaf
"figure out how best to get this election back on a ''fair'' footing."
While "rigging" may not be the exactly correct term, the email, which was apart of some "official business", certainly has bias and that is wrong IMO. FWIW I basically agree with your points and truly appreciate your sense of fair play.
Do you both concur that the AMA has attempted to rig this election and that Rusty should be removed from his position?