The OP had a personal agenda. That agenda was to denigrate Spektrum any way possible. The OP offered "proof" of a design flaw but never gave it. He rudely insulted responders who didn't agree with him. He has one particular lapdog assistant poster to helped flame the anti-Spektrum sentiment. Regardless, had he provided anything of actual substance regarding the circuit design (that he said he told Spektrum about) then there might be merit to his perspective and we would all appreciate it. But not once did he ever come forth with proof of a design flaw. His convenient excuse is health and age yet he is still capable of spewing the same old mantra. Selective ethics. It's sour grapes from someone with internet access, an agenda, a bias and nothing else to do. Nothing more. Nothing less. The OP's credibility is zero The moderators took too long to shut that thread down, only to restart it (?).