Originally Posted by
franklin_m
You asked for an example of evidence supporting a risk to manned aircraft from drones, I provided link to Virginia Tech Engineering study. You then asked for a single example of a mid-air, and I provided one. Again, if your case is so compelling that there is no risk, put your argument into a letter to the Governor and defend the hobby.
But, as you've said, you won't. Perhaps you can't make a compelling argument? The world wonders.
Again with the letter to the Governor. The hobby doesn't need to be defended to him.....we've already clearly and demonstrably proven the hobby doesn't present a danger, but wildlife sure does.