RCU Forums - View Single Post - Will adding weight make my glider fly better in wind?
Old 11-15-2018 | 08:50 AM
  #25  
Propworn's Avatar
Propworn
My Feedback: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,489
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
Hmmmm the judging criteria sounds a lot like IMAC, except we get judged on the turn around maneuvers too. Pattern has no scale realizm criteria but has constant speed requirements and judged turn around maneuvers. With pattern you need to fly the entire sequence inside an airspace " box ". Neither disciplines have guys adding ballast to their airplanes. In fact, pattern has an 11 lb maximum weight limit.


Not like IMAC at all between maneuvers if your not lined up the way you want you can call dead pass and do another go around. Prior to entering your maneuver you call it. I call mine prior to the last turn to the flight line "My next maneuver will be a LOOP" Now depending on the prototype being modeled 150 to 200 ft before center if I am positioned correctly I will announce "Starting Now" the same distance past center I will call "Complete" Judging is only between those two calls. Now a loop must be prototypical. A cub does not normally fly a loop without having to enter a bit of a dive to build up airspeed and the loop will be smaller and most likely oval shape and this is what the judges will be looking for as close to dead center as the pilot can get. WW1 aircraft may loop with or without the dive and some might actually stall at the top and fall on the back completing the loop. High performance aircraft enter the loop from straight and level and the size would depend on the prototype, jets and warbirds would have larger loops than an Edge but all of them would be expected to be round..

We have had many IMAC pilots enter scale with their IMAC planes and when they fly the maneuvers like they do in IMAC competition they do not score very well. They get upset because they score so well in IMAC but have failed to study the flight envelope of the prototype. The two have very different criteria.

Originally Posted by speedracerntrixie
I hate to tell you but with any powered model, simulating constant ground speed in the wind is much easier with a light model with lots of power.

I agree in the case of a warbird, jet or high performance plane but we are talking a motor glider not an abundance of power and what about any passes or maneuvers to be done with the engine stopped and prop simulated feathered? In scale there are so many variables you have to adapt. Adding ballast isn't always the ideal answer but under the conditions the op is thinking about flying and the air frame being modeled ballast may be the answer.


Dennis

Last edited by Propworn; 11-15-2018 at 08:52 AM.