Originally Posted by carrie.jet

We would like to share our experience with assisting in design of an aircraft with the manufacturer. Our most recent has been a very popular and first in the market, a full flying capable VTOL V-22 Osprey. The big success of the V-22 Osprey has been rooted back to all the data, testing and re-design by our team here in the USA. Due to the success level of our V-22, other big-name vendors followed suit and created a VTOL aircraft around the FC we assisted in developing/testing/programming in our V-22. This vendor has since the released 3 different VTOL aircraft. Although we are a vital part of this project, at no time did we have any agreements on any exclusive patent with our heavy design inputs. We also are not the owners of the aircraft mold. This entire RC industry is small as is and we believe it is important for vendors to support and encourage fellow vendors. We understand this discussion in regards to the Sparrow is on a different par mainly due to the cost of the aircraft. It is just upsetting to see words thrown around like Cease and Desist. It also stands with that most of discussion in regards to Pacific RC Jets and the interaction with the design of the Sparrow has been said and written for everyone to read. As we do understand, Pacific RC Jets did allow Global Jet Club in verbal permission to sell the Sparrow. This incident here is just taking turns that not any company really needs. Pacific RC Jets has stated they are working on the patent currently and has advised Global Jet Club to stay away from these projects until further notice. It really appears Pacific RC Jets need to figure this out with Aviation Jets. When nothing has been concrete, with the information and documentation that has been provided by Aviation Jets, the aircraft's in question here seem to be available for resale by any vendor. Again, we are not taking any sides here. It is just difficult to see this ongoing vengeance.

Back to the SU-35, these production issues Pacific RC Jets have brought up are fairly recent in the previous week or so. If you know and knew of these areas concerning the overall structural integrity of the aircraft, why was a public announcement posted to your Facebook page in February stating the SU-35 has been Thoroughly tested and are available for sale on the Pacific RC Jets website? Again, we are not trying to open any new can of worms here. It seems the posts are taking a turn for towards unfriendly turf and we hate to see it go that route. If any documents are presented, we can take it from there. We are continuing to work with our factories to provide new jet models coming in the near future. We have no problem what-so-ever removing the listings for the Sparrow, the A-10 and the SU-35 from our website. At the point where if any documents are presented showing Pacific RC Jets ownership for these named jets, we will comply with by removing them from our website.

Pacific RC Jets T1 line of aircraft and Kingtech Turbines are great products. We do wish Pacific RC Jets success in continuing to serve the turbine industry. We hope we can work alongside with you to provide excellent products and service for our turbine patrons.

In addition for clarification. Aviation Jets have been a part of the RC jet industry for some time now and in the China RC community from the start, have been abbreviated with AV for Aviation Jets. There really is no specific reason. The abbreviation AV was and is used and have a solid known association with Aviation Jets. At any time when we are speaking with manufacturers and factories such as Pilot RC, Feibao, JP Hobby, HSDJETS, when we mention AV, they know and associate with Aviation Jets. Also, AJ in our RC Industry is associated with a popular brand of RC 3D and Pattern aircraft.


With Best Regards,
Carrie Lau
Director of Operations
Global Jet Club/ACEx Turbines
Owner
Banana Hobby