RCU Forums - View Single Post - FAA recreational UAS operator change for 2020?
Old 01-30-2020, 10:47 AM
  #15  
RCUer75345
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SIX GUNS
I herd a roomer that amazon had something to do with thisis there any truth in that ?
Probably. Not just Amazon, but lots of other companies that want to use drones for commercial purposes including delivery. Drones can't see, so the FAA wants to create a new Unmanned Traffic System (UTM) to keep them from running into each other. Remote Identification (Remote ID) is needed to make that happen.

Originally Posted by SIX GUNS
and is all of this set in stone
Not yet. You can read the whole FAA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) here:
https://www.federalregister.gov/docu...rcraft-systems

You can also make comments, which the FAA has to review before the rule goes final. The comment period ends March 2 -- so don't wait too long.

Originally Posted by SIX GUNS
that we all are going to have to have an Faa # on our planes to fly
If the rule passes as written -- Yes. We'll have to put individual numbers on all our planes (except micros weighing 0.55 lb or less). And that means paying a fee for each plane.

Originally Posted by SIX GUNS
register our transmitters and receivers with the faa
No, only aircraft are required to have registration numbers. But there's a catch: The Remote ID requirements apply to "systems", not just airplanes; and the FAA defines a "system" as including the airplane and everything needed to fly or control it. That means it's not clear whether we can still use one transmitter with multiple Remote ID compliant airplanes.

Originally Posted by SIX GUNS
that would meen that the 72 MHz tx & rx would be no good to use
There is a way you can keep using 72 MHz equipment, and also newer equipment without Remote ID. It's called a Federally Recognized Identification Area (FRIA), meaning a place the FAA knows planes will be flying without Remote ID so drones can be steered around it. If you belong to a model club that has a fixed flying field, the Community Based Organization (CBO) that the club is part of can apply to have the field recognized as a FRIA. If you fly at a fixed site that doesn't have a club, you might want to think about forming one so you can protect your field in this way. You'll only have 12 months to do this after the rules go final.
Without a FRIA to fly in, your old radios and planes can still be used for 36 months after the rule goes final. After that they aren't legal to operate outside of a FRIA.

Originally Posted by SIX GUNS
and all of the new systems would have to have a chip in them to send a signal to the faa for use
It's more than "chip". The FAA NPRM says what the FAA wants the system to do, but not how to do it. You can't buy Remote ID equipment today, and there's no guarantee that components you can put in your own planes will ever be available. In fact the FAA is discouraging that -- they want all Remote ID compliant model airplanes to be off-the-shelf complete "systems" bought as a package. If you want to build new planes from kits, you can do that -- but only if you have a FRIA to fly them in.

Originally Posted by SIX GUNS
and would they be able to shut down any tx system they wanted
Probably can't shut it down, but one purpose of Remote ID is to make the data available for law enforcement. So if you're flying a Remote ID compliant plane at an illegal altitude, or an illegal location, your signals are creating a record which law enforcement can track or which can be used against you in court.

Originally Posted by SIX GUNS
just questions I have can anyone help me understand this ?
Hope this helped some. We're all going to have lots of questions as this shakes out.

IMO the best thing you can do right now is read the NPRM and make comments.