My understanding is simply that -IF questioned - show documentation.
FWIW - One of the new 40+% models on the market - has the fuselage width squashed to aprox 20% under width.
This model is -to many IMAC flyers absolutely the pinnacle of IMAC design- and it is a good one .
But on a scale test - -it simply is not scale.
So what? That -was never the intent of IMAC inthe first place.

IMAC was for scale like representations flown in a scalelike manner juged to the same type criteria.
This has been *******ized (member voted and approved *******ization!) a bit -which is a normal course for any competition event.

So --- as long as one can document - is there problem.
I don't see any of these planes as having some super secret design feature which will run rough shod over all others.
They should and could offer some new choices for those who (dare I say it) BUILD (gasp!) their own stuff.
BTW The Pogo is really slick-- Just think - you could put "I go Pogo " on the side.