mulligan

John,

You have too many errors in definition and logic in your post to address in another epic (I say this since you "strongly disagree" ) [sm=punching.gif] .

I'd rather let it be to others to look up the definitions and physics involved.

I am sorry for the loss of the boy's life as mentioned in your post. However, as is typical with reactionary rules, the neutral failsafe requirement misses the mark.