ORIGINAL: Jim_McIntyre
ORIGINAL: britbrat
Seems like the RCC gang want it dead. Why would that be?
ORIGINAL: sharpy01
... uncensored discussion here on sensitive political issues and can even poke some fun at the establishment.
'nuff said?
Originally, I was a fan of discussing political issues about MAAC so, I joined "the other site" (not RCCanada).
When all discussions eventually degraded to embarrassing character assasinations, I changed my mind and began voicing my discontent. After that same "other site" (again, not RCCanada who is being accused of the same) began banning anyone involved on one side of the discussion (pro MAAC), I signed off that "other site" permanently as it was obvious that the only intent of those I now see here was to do exactly as Mr Sharpe has stated.
I say amputate before it festers.[>:]
Revisionist history strikes again!!!. I admit I am jumping to conclusions as to what exactly the "other site" is, however if it is the one I think you mean there was a single individual banned from that site and it was because his posts had repeatedly become unbelievably unacceptable personal attacks which violated the forum guidelines. Others had their posts edited in keeping with the forum guidelines, however few if any complete posts were removed.
JH