Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > 3D Flying!
GP cap 232 >

GP cap 232

Community
Search
Notices
3D Flying! Our 3D flying forum is the ultimate resource for 3D flyers. Also discuss the latest in "4D" flying!

GP cap 232

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-2003 | 06:28 PM
  #1  
barto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Belgium, BELGIUM
Default GP cap 232

hi,

I am looking for a second plane and I am really thinking to buy the cap from GP, but I first want an opinion wether it is any good for second plane. If you have any experience with it? I would like to know if it flies stable on low rates and does it 3D good with an .40 FX installed?

Thanks
Old 02-18-2003 | 11:08 AM
  #2  
My Feedback: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Frederick, MD
Default CAP as second plane

barto,
Probably the worst plane you could pick as a second plane. I love this plane and own several from the 0.40 you are considering to a 40% Carden. Make this your 4th plane. It is not a stable plane even on low rates. A 40 FX is not enough engine to 3D this plane. you would need an OS 70 or YS 63 4/stroke or a good 60 or larger 2/stroke. (Stability and maneuverability do not go hand in hand. You give up one to get the other. This is a highly maneuverable plane).

Better choices for your second plane:
Sig Somethin Extra (really nice with low throws and allows you to progress to more advanced aerobatics as your skills improve). Other Sig planes including the "star" series of which the Mid*Star is a favorite of mine as a second plane. There are other planes in this category including the Morris Hobbies offerings however these might not be available easily in your location.

Many like the "stick" type of plane as a second plane. I like them too but see quicker learning curves with other planes.

Good luck,
EXCAP232
Old 02-18-2003 | 11:55 AM
  #3  
Badge's Avatar
My Feedback: (21)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Richmond Hill GA
Default GP cap 232

I disagree I went from a trainer to the gp cap and I loved it. It lands like a feather, of course it will snap with full rate elevatros but want aerobatic plane won't. Shes flys very good and after 6 years I still have her.
Old 02-18-2003 | 02:04 PM
  #4  
My Feedback: (73)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Boise, ID
Default GP cap 232

Hey Barto,
How is your flying with the plane you have now? Some guys adapt faster than others, I am one of the faster guys. In my own opinion, I fly a go-where-you-point-it type plane with a lot more ease than a let-the-wind-tell-you-where-you'll-be type plane that floats all over the place and can't handle wind. If you prop it right, say a 11x5 instead of a 10x6, it will do a good job of slowing her down. Mine floats like a trainer on landing, and is so stable, that on 3D rates, I can harrier her all over the place, like a RC car with wings. A good .45 and bigger is what is needed to fly good 3D, but for some practice, a .40 would work, especially if you already have one, then just move up to a bigger engine and buy a 5 dollar engine mount when your ready. If your confident in your solo flying, and can get help on your first few times out, I would recomend giving her a shot. By the way, The GP Cap 232 is a whole lot less building then her sister the GP Extra 300S.
Old 02-18-2003 | 03:13 PM
  #5  
My Feedback: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Frederick, MD
Default Safety

Originally posted by Badge
I disagree I went from a trainer to the gp cap and I loved it. It lands like a feather, of course it will snap with full rate elevators but want aerobatic plane won't. Shes flys very good and after 6 years I still have her.
While some do well with this type of plane as a second choice many leave the hobby after losing it a few flights on. It is possible to fly as your second plane however from a safety standpoint it is not advisable and against the rules at many club fields. Last year we had a couple of pilots try flying beyond their skill levels. Three planes were totaled. One hit a new building being erected at the end of the field (out of the flight line) and caused problems with the owner (who also owns our field). Two vehicles were damaged as well as our tractor shed being hit. Still not the best choice in my opinion from a learning standpoint or safety.

EXCAP232

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.