ORIGINAL: mesae
.....The folks at Zivko claimed the straight leading edge gave the Edge exceptional high-alpha performance i.e. higher deck angle before stall.
I'm guessing that this was an Edge like wing with a straight leading edge and swept forward trailing edge? If so then you effectively have some forward sweep angle at the 25% chord line.
AFAIK forward sweep tends to delay the stall at the tips.
ORIGINAL: dhanson
.....the upshot of all of this is pretty sobering .
The wingloading and power loadings make more difference than all of the rest of the characteristics put together .
And it always will. Especially at our sizes and weights. The shape, sweep and other stuff are bandaids. But I think it has more meaning in full sized stuff as they operate over a far narrower achievable range of wing loadings. The full sized stuff generally tries to keep the wings as small as possible for less cruise drag but with a nod of the head to landing speed range. But since they are all designing to a rather narrow range of requirements is it any wonder they all come out much the same shape and size for the given mission? We only see a big move away from this rather narrow path when the mission alters radically like with the U-2 or the recent two decades of aerobatic planes.
ORIGINAL: mesae
.....I lost count long ago of all the models I have seen lost to unintentional tip-stalls/partial snaps/incipient spins.
I've seen a lot of that when flying gliders. The pilots that learned on polyhedral RES models just cannot seem to get it into their heads that you can't take a model flying low and slow and throw a bunch of aileron into it for a last minute steep turn. The model dorks in and cartwheels and they are totally befuddled as too what happened. A wild range of theories results but the one real cause is never uttered.