Man I am really on the fence here. I like Dean's idea of breaking it down to the 10 manuevers. IMO this makes it more accurate to score the flight rather than try to reflect upon the flight after the fact. After sitting through 20 sequences things like this get pretty flakey. I like Bill's suggestion of a 0-5-10 score even better.

I will have to dis-agree with Bill on this double jepordy thing because it is going to happen, like it or not. An example for this is going to be a sportsman pilot that ends a turn around manuever 250' out. His next manuever is at the other end of the box and he is drifting in the whole way. Now because he does not realize this, he pulls vertical but is 15 degrees in. He is going to get hit on the presentation score and for the individual manuever score. Or worst yet, someone flys past the dead line, zero for the manuever and a big hit in presentation. See what I mean?


Shawn