Frank
Ok, lets take it slowly and all get on the same page.
1. OP makes an accusation with zero proof.
Another way to look at that is:
1. OP testifies as witness that events occurred, and we have heard no conflicting testimony or denial.
2. People jump on board and immediately convict the person as being guilty of all charges.
many of these people are not just random forum goers
that have read about something bad happening to other folks and want to mob up.
We can see that a bunch of them have had similar 1st person experience from that D5 appointee,
thereby adding their testimony to present a pattern of abuse
Remember Frank,
no matter how much documentation, pictorial evidence, and witnesses one has lined up,
to support claims against another party...
when the other guy refuses to show up for court
you win without opening your briefcase.
We havent heard if that AMA position holder is going to justify or deny doing it.
Should he deny it, then we open the briefcase and win the test of truth.
Now, my question is, what makes us better than anyone else to judge someone?
As one of the victims that can clearly identify just who it was that wronged me,
I can with a clear conscious do just that in my case.
Now, seeing that I can easily judge him when he did it to me,
I dont have too hard a time believing he did it to others as well as me.
Especially since he never denies it even when called on it.
This is not a group of 3rd party hearsay-ers that want to mob up.
It is a group of victims that know exactly who the culprit is that wronged them.
For uninvolved readers to question the motivation of the victims, thats easy:
We dont like having been wronged by AMA position holders, and are aghast at hearing the pattern & history of it going on unchecked by AMA.
The OP started this by bringing up that AMA guys attempts to get folks kicked out of AMA for conduct.
The the conduct in my case is something that AMA does
not consider unacceptable.
However, the OP points out that Red's conduct pattern
is very likely to be something AMA would find unacceptable.
Do I want to know all the facts? No. I do not.
good news, we havent posted all the emails containing the dirt
so you should be happy about that much at least
(of who we do not really know who that is because we have seen no proof)
wait... didnt you
just say you dont want to know all the facts,
and in the same breath now complain that we havent posted the evidence yet?