Airbrakes on flying wing to control yaw?
#1
Thread Starter
Airbrakes on flying wing to control yaw?
I am working on my first flying wing. It is a swept wing with fins at the wing tips, sort of like a Zagi on steroid.
I have working split airbrakes and I was wondering if they can be used to
control yaw in flight. The idea would be to deploy the airbrake on one wing to increase the drag on the wing and induce yaw. I have already set up the radio for that, but before I give it an actual try I'd like to hear from people with more experience.
Thank you
I have working split airbrakes and I was wondering if they can be used to
control yaw in flight. The idea would be to deploy the airbrake on one wing to increase the drag on the wing and induce yaw. I have already set up the radio for that, but before I give it an actual try I'd like to hear from people with more experience.
Thank you
#4
Certainly it will work, my dad was controlling yaw in his RC version of his later full scale home built design of the Sawyer Skyjacker II back in 1974, you can see the yaw control door towards the leading edge in the first picture on the left, and it was really nothing more then an air brake. The doors in flight are flush but as rudder peddle is applied the doors are independently deployed up to about 45 degees and are very effective in yaw control.
Bob
Bob
Last edited by sensei; 01-22-2014 at 05:06 AM.
#5
Whatever they are called - they actually work. I'm not the one with experience but before there is no information for you I'll rather contribute my second-hand knowledge. In a former post (http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/aero...l#post10581301) I gave two links to Web pages of a very skilled modeler who made these "spoilerons" for a model of a stork which obviously has no vetical tail. He even used a rate gyro coupled to the spoilerons to emulate the yaw damping effect of a fin. Follow the two links and look at the pictures, which are all in English as opposed to the German text. Unfortunately, this brilliant modeler passed away a few years ago so we can not ask him any questions.
Probably you would not need a rate gyro if you are only looking for some rudder effect. But consider that split ailerons come out thin and flexible and are more prone to flutter than conventional ones. So you would need to build complex but rigid aileron halves, not to mention the cost and weight of four servos and the complex mixer in the transmitter or an airborne unit.
Probably you would not need a rate gyro if you are only looking for some rudder effect. But consider that split ailerons come out thin and flexible and are more prone to flutter than conventional ones. So you would need to build complex but rigid aileron halves, not to mention the cost and weight of four servos and the complex mixer in the transmitter or an airborne unit.
#6
Senior Member
A lot of big commercial jets use spoilers instead of ailerons. They often have both, but use the spoilers for turns while cruising to change directions with the least affect on airspeed.
The P61 Blackwidow of WWII was designed to rely on spoilers instead of ailerons. They were called spoilerons.
The P61 Blackwidow of WWII was designed to rely on spoilers instead of ailerons. They were called spoilerons.
#8
Thread Starter
Well, the model I have (which is already built) is a Ligthning Dart. The split airbrakes are inboard of the ailerons, you can see the horns acting on the top part in the picture.
I realize that being close to the center they may not be as effective as when they are placed near the tip... Right now a single servo in each wing operates both halves.
With some investment in time and money, I could install 4 slim servos to operate the top and bottom part independently. I own a Taranis radio, whose programming capabilities
are practically limitless, so that is not much of a problem...
I realize that being close to the center they may not be as effective as when they are placed near the tip... Right now a single servo in each wing operates both halves.
With some investment in time and money, I could install 4 slim servos to operate the top and bottom part independently. I own a Taranis radio, whose programming capabilities
are practically limitless, so that is not much of a problem...
#9
Senior Member
In fact, they are used because they do yaw as well a induce roll. The commercial application of spoilers for turning is the spoiler on the inside of the desired turn creates drag which induces yaw in the desired direction. Aileron deflections require perfect differential to provide equal "steering" for the same drag.
Of course it's true their purpose isn't yaw, but then ailerons purpose isn't either.
Of course it's true their purpose isn't yaw, but then ailerons purpose isn't either.
#10
By the way, I don't care much about the name of the things, even though Spoilerons seems very apt to me. After all for instance on gliders, spoilers are used for their drag and less lift is only an unwanted by-product. And those split ailerons have been used full-size as speed brakes and named spoilerons before.
#11
Thread Starter
It is made by avia-richmodel, but now it is discontinued.
It is my first foray into flying wings and I may just take it easy for now.
It flies well, though ground handling is a bit of an issue. Right now I am waiting for some oleo struts to replace the crappy front wheel
gear that bends where it attaches to the frame with every landing...
Last edited by ululi1970; 01-23-2014 at 08:27 AM.
#12
My Feedback: (11)
There's a major thing to consider: without some kind of augmented stability device on board the model, what will keep the rear of the model behind the front? If you are going to have no vertical fin, but use differential drag to control yaw, you will most certainly need a gyro of some type to keep applying control action as the model is disturbed by currents in the air. The B-2 cannot fly without its control computers operating...there's nothing else to give it yaw stability. A fin is used to move the lateral center of pressure behind the center of gravity. With no fin, the center of pressure could be anywhere, and the model will not have any kind of yaw stability. The alternative would to have a swept wing with split ailerons that are split at all times to have enough drag at all times to keep the trailing edge aft of the nose.
Without something to hold the rear behind the model, it won't fly well at all. That's why planes have crashed when their vertical fins have been ripped off...the B-70 suffered the same fate when it lost its vertical fins.
Without something to hold the rear behind the model, it won't fly well at all. That's why planes have crashed when their vertical fins have been ripped off...the B-70 suffered the same fate when it lost its vertical fins.
#14
Thread Starter
Speaking of B-2, I ran into this this afternoon
http://www.generalhobby.com/stealth-...cts-p-525.html
So it looks like a model B-2 can fly without fins and the sophisticated electronics of the real one. Looking at the pictures it shows
the tip split aribrakes...
http://www.generalhobby.com/stealth-...cts-p-525.html
So it looks like a model B-2 can fly without fins and the sophisticated electronics of the real one. Looking at the pictures it shows
the tip split aribrakes...
#15
Speaking of B-2, I ran into this this afternoon
http://www.generalhobby.com/stealth-...cts-p-525.html
So it looks like a model B-2 can fly without fins and the sophisticated electronics of the real one. Looking at the pictures it shows
the tip split aribrakes...
http://www.generalhobby.com/stealth-...cts-p-525.html
So it looks like a model B-2 can fly without fins and the sophisticated electronics of the real one. Looking at the pictures it shows
the tip split aribrakes...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-5ctTWQODk
#18
Whatever they are called - they actually work. I'm not the one with experience but before there is no information for you I'll rather contribute my second-hand knowledge. In a former post (http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/aero...l#post10581301) I gave two links to Web pages of a very skilled modeler who made these "spoilerons" for a model of a stork which obviously has no vetical tail. He even used a rate gyro coupled to the spoilerons to emulate the yaw damping effect of a fin. Follow the two links and look at the pictures, which are all in English as opposed to the German text. Unfortunately, this brilliant modeler passed away a few years ago so we can not ask him any questions.
Probably you would not need a rate gyro if you are only looking for some rudder effect. But consider that split ailerons come out thin and flexible and are more prone to flutter than conventional ones. So you would need to build complex but rigid aileron halves, not to mention the cost and weight of four servos and the complex mixer in the transmitter or an airborne unit.
Probably you would not need a rate gyro if you are only looking for some rudder effect. But consider that split ailerons come out thin and flexible and are more prone to flutter than conventional ones. So you would need to build complex but rigid aileron halves, not to mention the cost and weight of four servos and the complex mixer in the transmitter or an airborne unit.
#20
tried to draw my idea.
the air brakes would need their own servo
and if you wanted to, you could have the clamshell on one side open and the other stay closed....this would act like a rudder.
the air brakes would need their own servo
and if you wanted to, you could have the clamshell on one side open and the other stay closed....this would act like a rudder.
#22
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Aurora,
CO
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The B-52 uses spoilers for roll control too. A disadvantage is that if you push over into a zero-G condition, no lift on the wings, they become ineffective. This was a factor in a spectacular crash at Fairchild AFB in 1994:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUEhNKBi4DY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUEhNKBi4DY
#23
Thread Starter
Thanks for all your ideas. Unfortunately, my set up has the airbrakes inboard relative to the ailerons. So they would probably be not very effective so close to the center of the wing. I guess next time...
It was an interesting discussion.
It was an interesting discussion.
#24
They may not be as effective but they should still work to some small degree.
One thing to note for future reference, from what I have seen done. The method of choice now is more like a spoiler setup top and bottom on the wingtips as opposed to the clam shell arrangement.
One thing to note for future reference, from what I have seen done. The method of choice now is more like a spoiler setup top and bottom on the wingtips as opposed to the clam shell arrangement.
#25
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Manassas Virginia
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I used a Klingberg wing type of yaw dampening system on early Zagi's, both slope and powered. Worked well. Klingberg yaw dampening is very simple. Small, very undersized, hinged tip verticals. I used 20 mil mylar. When the airframe would yaw, the leading wingtip yaw dampener would hit the stop (wing tip) and the trailing would hing to stay aligned to the airflow causing more drag on the leading wing tip than the trailing wing tip. Very simple.