![]() |
Inverted V-tail
Why do we not see many interted V-tail configurations? Ground clearance would be my best guess, just wondering about any aerodynamic reasons.
-Steve |
RE: Inverted V-tail
Besides the rotation problem, I think I would rip those things off about once a weekend on the landings.
|
RE: Inverted V-tail
Inverted vees ususally require two booms to get the surfaces off the groung.
If the plane doesn't have retracts, a single tail boom places the surface at risk. |
RE: Inverted V-tail
I think the Predator Survallince UAV missed that part of the course.
Any inverted V helps stop air from sliding sideways off of a surface, reduces drag and increases lift capacity. |
RE: Inverted V-tail
For the Predator they act as tailskids to prevent a prop strike. The could have done the same thing with a large underfin and standard horizontal tail but this saves an extra surface.
|
RE: Inverted V-tail
See the discussion at http://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/m_39...tm.htm#3951752
|
RE: Inverted V-tail
ORIGINAL: cyclops2 I think the Predator Survallince UAV missed that part of the course. Any inverted V helps stop air from sliding sideways off of a surface, reduces drag and increases lift capacity. And you missed "retracts"... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:10 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.