Covid-19, Sanctioned Events, & Aging Demographic
#101
The FedEx Open, Jim Richmond Open, The US Open, The French Open,etc. By your reasoning, they should be advertised now as The FedEx CANCELLED, The Jim Richmond CANCELLED, The US CANCELLED, The French CANCELLED, etc. Come on, really? People don't know what an "Open" is? "Open' is part of the name. Jeesh!
There is a saying, 'You can't fix stupid'. Maybe that should apply here.
R_Strowe
There is a saying, 'You can't fix stupid'. Maybe that should apply here.
R_Strowe
#102
I didn’t realize it was such an overbearing burden to have to actually READ a short description of an event to find out if it was CANCELLED or not.
Oh, the weights some must carry on their shoulders .
R_Strowe
#104
#105
This isn't a matter of fixing stupid or anything else. Just because the FedEx Open is titled that and has been for who knows how long, it wouldn't take anything to add IS CANCELLED/POSTPONED after the event title in the thread title or, conversely, in the first post. It's a simple way to let everyone know what's going on. All of your "The French Cancelled" and other rhetoric is nothing more that just another way of slamming Franklin. It would really be nice to see all of those that are so heavily mainlining the AMA's rhetoric start using common sense rather than slamming everyone that doesn't see things the same way
No, what Franklin proposes is that they change the title of the event, which therefore changes the actual name of the event, all because some people out there are too lazy to actually read the text description of the event.
And am I slamming Franklin? Damn straight I am. I am sick and tired of the constant, nothing but negativity regarding the ONLY organization the is actually fighting for this hobby. Is the AMA perfect? No, but then again nobody is (except Franklin). And whether one likes it or not, there are alternative explanations for EVERYTHING the AMA has done that people find objectionable.
If this contradicts your world view, then I'm sorry. But although we are all entitled to our opinions, there is also a responsibility that goes with making such opinions known. Franklin was banned from another site for crossing that line. He has done the same here, and it is sad that the mods here don't see that as well.
R_Strowe
#106
Um, isn't that exactly what the organizers did? They edited the body of the text to indicate that the event had been cancelled or postponed. And it is not rhetoric. It is in fact exactly what Franklin was proposing. And it is a preposterous proposal. I didn't see any of the AMA event's advertising so I can't say. I know several events the wife and I were planning to go to have been cancelled and what I put in my last post was actually added to the advertising
No, what Franklin proposes is that they change the title of the event, which therefore changes the actual name of the event, all because some people out there are too lazy to actually read the text description of the event. I've been involved in many events where the advertising wasn't changed in a manner that was OBVIOUS and CLEAR. The results were that some of the people that showed up demanded a refund due to false advertising. You may think that's stupid but it has happened and the people that felt cheated not only were able to attend the event, they did so at everyone else's expense.
And am I slamming Franklin? Damn straight I am. I am sick and tired of the constant, nothing but negativity regarding the ONLY organization the is actually fighting for this hobby. Is the AMA perfect? No, but then again nobody is (except Franklin). And whether one likes it or not, there are alternative explanations for EVERYTHING the AMA has done that people find objectionable. Okay, maybe there is but, with the issues I have, there isn't an explanation that would make sense. I do like the fact that at least we agree on some things, even if they are small or seem irrelevant
If this contradicts your world view, then I'm sorry. But although we are all entitled to our opinions, there is also a responsibility that goes with making such opinions known. Franklin was banned from another site for crossing that line. He has done the same here, and it is sad that the mods here don't see that as well. I don't agree with many things the AMA EC tries to do. With new blood in the EC, I'm hoping some of the issues I've had will be minimized/eliminated. I also don't agree with everything Franklin says. What I do see is both sides need to be willing to bend some and, if that can't happen, someone/something is going to be on the outside looking in.
R_Strowe
No, what Franklin proposes is that they change the title of the event, which therefore changes the actual name of the event, all because some people out there are too lazy to actually read the text description of the event. I've been involved in many events where the advertising wasn't changed in a manner that was OBVIOUS and CLEAR. The results were that some of the people that showed up demanded a refund due to false advertising. You may think that's stupid but it has happened and the people that felt cheated not only were able to attend the event, they did so at everyone else's expense.
And am I slamming Franklin? Damn straight I am. I am sick and tired of the constant, nothing but negativity regarding the ONLY organization the is actually fighting for this hobby. Is the AMA perfect? No, but then again nobody is (except Franklin). And whether one likes it or not, there are alternative explanations for EVERYTHING the AMA has done that people find objectionable. Okay, maybe there is but, with the issues I have, there isn't an explanation that would make sense. I do like the fact that at least we agree on some things, even if they are small or seem irrelevant
If this contradicts your world view, then I'm sorry. But although we are all entitled to our opinions, there is also a responsibility that goes with making such opinions known. Franklin was banned from another site for crossing that line. He has done the same here, and it is sad that the mods here don't see that as well. I don't agree with many things the AMA EC tries to do. With new blood in the EC, I'm hoping some of the issues I've had will be minimized/eliminated. I also don't agree with everything Franklin says. What I do see is both sides need to be willing to bend some and, if that can't happen, someone/something is going to be on the outside looking in.
R_Strowe
#107
Thread Starter
If this contradicts your world view, then I'm sorry. But although we are all entitled to our opinions, there is also a responsibility that goes with making such opinions known. Franklin was banned from another site for crossing that line. He has done the same here, and it is sad that the mods here don't see that as well.
My point is that it's exceedingly easy to make a hand-wave statement like "a responsibility that goes with making such opinions known." However in reality that turns out to be nothing but an arbitrary and undefined standard that shifts depending on the point of view. So, since you established this "responsibility with making such opinions known," and have implied that I've not done that, so please take the responsibility for defining what "it" is.
#108
I am sick and tired of the constant, nothing but negativity regarding the ONLY organization the is actually fighting for this hobby. ......... Franklin was banned from another site for crossing that line. He has done the same here, and it is sad that the mods here don't see that as well.
R_Strowe
R_Strowe
PS , I am NOT defending Franklin's talking points here , but I will most certainly defend the Man's right to air his opinions just as anyone else here has the right to air theirs . You don't like his opinions/views ? Fine ! By all means attack his talking points and prove to me how their wrong , for real I'll listen to any point/counterpoint you want to present . But when you stoop to the low of attacking someone personally by threatening to have him banned for his opinions , which don't break any RCU rules (or he'd have already been banned long before you joined 1 1/2 months ago) , that's the behavior of a coward in my view , someone who'd rather "shoot the messenger" rather than refute the message .
For my "on topic" part of all of this , a LOT more than just the AMA have been caught off guard with the virus , and once the "rest of the iceberg" was finally seen I believe most organizations , the AMA included , have behaved properly by encouraging the all important "Social Distancing" .......
#109
My Feedback: (1)
???????????????
Is that like, "alternative facts"??????????????
It doesn't really matter if it contradicts ones world view or not, whether or not it contradicts the facts is what really matters.
While we are all entitled to our opinions, we all must understand that there are right opinions and wrong opinions. Our responsibility when we openly discuss our opinions, is to support them with facts, not argue them to the bitter end and call anyone with opposing views disparaging names.
PRIME example of what I was just talking about, and more logical fallacies! Because YOU say he has crossed the line, does not mean that he has (on RCU, I could care less what happened on another forum, especially THAT one!). You try and push YOUR agenda by calling it sad that he isn't banned here, when in reality, this forum IS moderated, and people are banned all the time. Like his opinions or not, I don't believe that Franklin has broken any of the forum rules here (at least not any that his detractors have not broken engaging in the same discussions).
I find it sad that you, an adult participating in a toy airplane forum, cannot stand the words that another types on a keyboard so much, that you feel you need a moderator to ban them! Do you really not value your freedom of speech so much, that you are willing to try and shut someone up because your opinion differs from theirs? WOW, just WOW!
Astro
Is that like, "alternative facts"??????????????
Originally Posted by R_Strowe
If this contradicts your world view, then I'm sorry.
Originally Posted by R_Strowe
But although we are all entitled to our opinions, there is also a responsibility that goes with making such opinions known.
Originally Posted by R_Strowe
Franklin was banned from another site for crossing that line. He has done the same here, and it is sad that the mods here don't see that as well.
I find it sad that you, an adult participating in a toy airplane forum, cannot stand the words that another types on a keyboard so much, that you feel you need a moderator to ban them! Do you really not value your freedom of speech so much, that you are willing to try and shut someone up because your opinion differs from theirs? WOW, just WOW!
Astro
#110
Gee, Init, I hadn't even noticed Mr Strowe's join date. That kind of makes Astro the old man on the block and me the next in line. I didn't realize I'd been around the forums for 15 years and 5 months. Does that mean I'm outdated or obsolete? Could I be out of touch as well? DAMMIT, NOW YOU HAVE ME THINKING AND SECOND GUESSING MYSELF!!!!!!!!!
Astro, hard to believe we've been around that long and, being roughly 50 miles apart, have never met. I guess one of these days I need to get one of my Kadet Jrs done and we'll have to meet up and see if it will actually fly.
Astro, hard to believe we've been around that long and, being roughly 50 miles apart, have never met. I guess one of these days I need to get one of my Kadet Jrs done and we'll have to meet up and see if it will actually fly.
#111
My Feedback: (1)
Regards,
Astro
#112
My club(R/C Unlimiteds) is scheduled to race at Smokey Point the end of May, don't know if that's going to hold up or not at this point. If it doesn't, our only other scheduled race at Smokey Point will be in September. I'll have to wait and see as there's been no updates on the club site, other than they are keeping watch on the situation and will post updates as the race dates get closer.
#113
Club Meetings ?
So , thinking beyond scheduled events which are all pretty much canceled at this point (if not by the people who scheduled them , by the different State's "Social Distancing" mandates) , I'm left wondering , If this virus disruption of daily life continues for some undetermined number of months to come , how will RC flying clubs (like the one I belong to) be able to conduct the business usually done at the regular meetings ? I think one of those on line "Go to Meeting" type softwares would be perfect , since we're in such a tech heavy hobby anyway I'd bet even the older club members have internet access (just look around at all of us fossils posting here ) . I'd bet meeting participation would actually go up if the physical trip to the club field for the meeting was eliminated , and it would get club business done without disobeying the "No gatherings over X* amount of people" restrictions currently in place .
* Last I heard , our Governor Charlie Baker set the limit at 25 or less , this may have changed to an even smaller number recently but last I heard it was 25
* Last I heard , our Governor Charlie Baker set the limit at 25 or less , this may have changed to an even smaller number recently but last I heard it was 25
#114
Thread Starter
So , thinking beyond scheduled events which are all pretty much canceled at this point (if not by the people who scheduled them , by the different State's "Social Distancing" mandates) , I'm left wondering , If this virus disruption of daily life continues for some undetermined number of months to come , how will RC flying clubs (like the one I belong to) be able to conduct the business usually done at the regular meetings ? I think one of those on line "Go to Meeting" type softwares would be perfect , since we're in such a tech heavy hobby anyway I'd bet even the older club members have internet access (just look around at all of us fossils posting here ) . I'd bet meeting participation would actually go up if the physical trip to the club field for the meeting was eliminated , and it would get club business done without disobeying the "No gatherings over X* amount of people" restrictions currently in place .
* Last I heard , our Governor Charlie Baker set the limit at 25 or less , this may have changed to an even smaller number recently but last I heard it was 25
* Last I heard , our Governor Charlie Baker set the limit at 25 or less , this may have changed to an even smaller number recently but last I heard it was 25
#116
Thread Starter
We are, at this point, ok for normal operations but no events/meetings which means 10 people or so out there spread out well and lots of hand washing.
We might be down to shelter in place soon unless the spring breakers go home and stay off the beach and out of the bars
We might be down to shelter in place soon unless the spring breakers go home and stay off the beach and out of the bars
#118
I didn't hear it personally, but I did learn of a report that your Governor is frustrated with people still gathering. California and NY had the same problem, they tried to rely on people to do the right thing and follow the rules, which they did not. I guess NY Governor personally went to the park yesterday and saw groups playing basketball and baseball - and that's WITH a shelter in place order active.
#119
Thread Starter
Not what I thought I said. Certainly not what I've seen any of them issue. What they're saying is much like what NY Governor said today. It's fine to go outside, but maintain social distancing unless you're with people you already live with. I think I noted in my comment that he personally saw people playing basketball and baseball - activities where he felt they were not maintaining the social distance that's so critical.
#120
So, please define the above for us. What is the clear bright line that establishes the difference between expressing one's opinions and the "a responsibility with making such opinions known." Maybe let's just start with the last half of it to make things easy. What is the definition of the term "a responsibility with making such opinions known?" What are it's limits? Is it that some topics are off limits while others are ok? If so, then which ones fall in ok and off limits? Or is it that some are ok sometimes, but not others? If so, when are the ok and when are they not? Or is it that there's a number or frequency to comments that cross the line. If so, how many? How often? So many times a day? A month? Or a year? Or is it a ratio? That one has to have so many positive comments vs. negative ones? Again, what are the numbers. Or is it some other criteria?
My point is that it's exceedingly easy to make a hand-wave statement like "a responsibility that goes with making such opinions known." However in reality that turns out to be nothing but an arbitrary and undefined standard that shifts depending on the point of view. So, since you established this "responsibility with making such opinions known," and have implied that I've not done that, so please take the responsibility for defining what "it" is.
My point is that it's exceedingly easy to make a hand-wave statement like "a responsibility that goes with making such opinions known." However in reality that turns out to be nothing but an arbitrary and undefined standard that shifts depending on the point of view. So, since you established this "responsibility with making such opinions known," and have implied that I've not done that, so please take the responsibility for defining what "it" is.
I've personally had flights that I was operating get cancelled because a passenger started shooting their mouths off about something they THOUGHT they knew. Just because you have the financials for AMA (which admittedly are not good, but that isn't the point), you continue to beat the dead horse about anything to denigrate the AMA. The latest is regarding COVID19. They just put out a podcast discussing this exact subject. They have put out email statements. What more from them do you want? Events are in fact cancelling or being postponed. Apparently not fast enough for you, though. I guess the AMA is not nearly adaptable enough, so it must die? We all get it. You do not like the AMA. Then don't renew. Sit on the sidelines and watch it die. That's all you really want, right?
R_Strowe
#122
My Feedback: (1)
Originally Posted by R_Dtrowe
Those were opinions of the respective passengers.
Originally Posted by R_Strowe
WORDS HAVE AN EFFECT ON OTHERS.
Originally Posted by R_Strowe
And yours have had a highly detrimental effect on the hobby.
Originally Posted by R_Strowe
That is what I mean by responsibility. When one is continuously stating their opinions for the purpose of advancing their private agenda (destruction of the AMA), then they carry a responsibility for the negative effects of their words, as well as any positive ones.
Originally Posted by R_Strowe
I've personally had flights that I was operating get cancelled because a passenger started shooting their mouths off about something they THOUGHT they knew.
Originally Posted by R_Strowe
Just because you have the financials for AMA (which admittedly are not good, but that isn't the point), you continue to beat the dead horse about anything to denigrate the AMA.
Originally Posted by R_Strowe
We all get it. You do not like the AMA.
Originally Posted by R_Strowe
Sit on the sidelines and watch it die.
Astro